目前我正在做一些从bash执行的单元测试。单元测试在bash脚本中初始化、执行和清理。该脚本通常包含init()、execute()和cleanup()函数。但它们不是强制性的。我想测试它们是否有定义。
我以前通过greping和seding源代码做到了这一点,但这似乎是错误的。还有更优雅的方式吗?
编辑:下面这句话很有魔力:
fn_exists()
{
LC_ALL=C type $1 | grep -q 'shell function'
}
目前我正在做一些从bash执行的单元测试。单元测试在bash脚本中初始化、执行和清理。该脚本通常包含init()、execute()和cleanup()函数。但它们不是强制性的。我想测试它们是否有定义。
我以前通过greping和seding源代码做到了这一点,但这似乎是错误的。还有更优雅的方式吗?
编辑:下面这句话很有魔力:
fn_exists()
{
LC_ALL=C type $1 | grep -q 'shell function'
}
当前回答
挖掘一根旧柱子……但我最近使用了这个方法,并测试了以下两种替代方法:
test_declare () {
a () { echo 'a' ;}
declare -f a > /dev/null
}
test_type () {
a () { echo 'a' ;}
type a | grep -q 'is a function'
}
echo 'declare'
time for i in $(seq 1 1000); do test_declare; done
echo 'type'
time for i in $(seq 1 100); do test_type; done
这产生了:
real 0m0.064s
user 0m0.040s
sys 0m0.020s
type
real 0m2.769s
user 0m1.620s
sys 0m1.130s
声明要快得多!
其他回答
测试不同的解决方案:
#!/bin/bash
test_declare () {
declare -f f > /dev/null
}
test_declare2 () {
declare -F f > /dev/null
}
test_type () {
type -t f | grep -q 'function'
}
test_type2 () {
[[ $(type -t f) = function ]]
}
funcs=(test_declare test_declare2 test_type test_type2)
test () {
for i in $(seq 1 1000); do $1; done
}
f () {
echo 'This is a test function.'
echo 'This has more than one command.'
return 0
}
post='(f is function)'
for j in 1 2 3; do
for func in ${funcs[@]}; do
echo $func $post
time test $func
echo exit code $?; echo
done
case $j in
1) unset -f f
post='(f unset)'
;;
2) f='string'
post='(f is string)'
;;
esac
done
例如:输出
test_declare (f is function) real 0m0,055s user 0m0,041s sys 0m0,004s exit code 0 test_declare2 (f is function) real 0m0,042s user 0m0,022s sys 0m0,017s exit code 0 test_type (f is function) real 0m2,200s user 0m1,619s sys 0m1,008s exit code 0 test_type2 (f is function) real 0m0,746s user 0m0,534s sys 0m0,237s exit code 0 test_declare (f unset) real 0m0,040s user 0m0,029s sys 0m0,010s exit code 1 test_declare2 (f unset) real 0m0,038s user 0m0,038s sys 0m0,000s exit code 1 test_type (f unset) real 0m2,438s user 0m1,678s sys 0m1,045s exit code 1 test_type2 (f unset) real 0m0,805s user 0m0,541s sys 0m0,274s exit code 1 test_declare (f is string) real 0m0,043s user 0m0,034s sys 0m0,007s exit code 1 test_declare2 (f is string) real 0m0,039s user 0m0,035s sys 0m0,003s exit code 1 test_type (f is string) real 0m2,394s user 0m1,679s sys 0m1,035s exit code 1 test_type2 (f is string) real 0m0,851s user 0m0,554s sys 0m0,294s exit code 1
所以declare -F似乎是最好的解决方案。
fn_exists()
{
[[ $(type -t $1) == function ]] && return 0
}
更新
isFunc ()
{
[[ $(type -t $1) == function ]]
}
$ isFunc isFunc
$ echo $?
0
$ isFunc dfgjhgljhk
$ echo $?
1
$ isFunc psgrep && echo yay
yay
$
我会将其改进为:
fn_exists()
{
type $1 2>/dev/null | grep -q 'is a function'
}
像这样使用它:
fn_exists test_function
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo 'Function exists!'
else
echo 'Function does not exist...'
fi
这告诉你它是否存在,但不是说它是一个函数
fn_exists()
{
type $1 >/dev/null 2>&1;
}
挖掘一根旧柱子……但我最近使用了这个方法,并测试了以下两种替代方法:
test_declare () {
a () { echo 'a' ;}
declare -f a > /dev/null
}
test_type () {
a () { echo 'a' ;}
type a | grep -q 'is a function'
}
echo 'declare'
time for i in $(seq 1 1000); do test_declare; done
echo 'type'
time for i in $(seq 1 100); do test_type; done
这产生了:
real 0m0.064s
user 0m0.040s
sys 0m0.020s
type
real 0m2.769s
user 0m1.620s
sys 0m1.130s
声明要快得多!