借鉴其他解决方案和评论，我得出了以下结论:

fn_exists() {
  # appended double quote is an ugly trick to make sure we do get a string -- if $1 is not a known command, type does not output anything
  [ `type -t $1`"" == 'function' ]
}

用作……

if ! fn_exists $FN; then
    echo "Hey, $FN does not exist ! Duh."
    exit 2
fi

它检查给定的参数是否是一个函数，并避免重定向和其他grepping。

像这样:[[$(type -t foo) == function]] && echo " foo存在"

内置类型命令将告诉您某个东西是函数、内置函数、外部命令还是没有定义。

附加的例子:

$ LC_ALL=C type foo
bash: type: foo: not found

$ LC_ALL=C type ls
ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'

$ which type

$ LC_ALL=C type type
type is a shell builtin

$ LC_ALL=C type -t rvm
function

$ if [ -n "$(LC_ALL=C type -t rvm)" ] && [ "$(LC_ALL=C type -t rvm)" = function ]; then echo rvm is a function; else echo rvm is NOT a function; fi
rvm is a function

我特别喜欢Grégory Joseph的解决方案

但我对它做了一点修改，以克服“双引号丑陋的把戏”:

function is_executable()
{
    typeset TYPE_RESULT="`type -t $1`"

    if [ "$TYPE_RESULT" == 'function' ]; then
        return 0
    else
        return 1
    fi
}

测试不同的解决方案:

#!/bin/bash

test_declare () {
    declare -f f > /dev/null
}

test_declare2 () {
    declare -F f > /dev/null
}

test_type () {
    type -t f | grep -q 'function'
}

test_type2 () {
     [[ $(type -t f) = function ]]
}

funcs=(test_declare test_declare2 test_type test_type2)

test () {
    for i in $(seq 1 1000); do $1; done
}

f () {
echo 'This is a test function.'
echo 'This has more than one command.'
return 0
}
post='(f is function)'

for j in 1 2 3; do

    for func in ${funcs[@]}; do
        echo $func $post
        time test $func
        echo exit code $?; echo
    done

    case $j in
    1)  unset -f f
        post='(f unset)'
        ;;
    2)  f='string'
        post='(f is string)'
        ;;
    esac
done

例如:输出

test_declare (f is function) real 0m0,055s user 0m0,041s sys 0m0,004s exit code 0 test_declare2 (f is function) real 0m0,042s user 0m0,022s sys 0m0,017s exit code 0 test_type (f is function) real 0m2,200s user 0m1,619s sys 0m1,008s exit code 0 test_type2 (f is function) real 0m0,746s user 0m0,534s sys 0m0,237s exit code 0 test_declare (f unset) real 0m0,040s user 0m0,029s sys 0m0,010s exit code 1 test_declare2 (f unset) real 0m0,038s user 0m0,038s sys 0m0,000s exit code 1 test_type (f unset) real 0m2,438s user 0m1,678s sys 0m1,045s exit code 1 test_type2 (f unset) real 0m0,805s user 0m0,541s sys 0m0,274s exit code 1 test_declare (f is string) real 0m0,043s user 0m0,034s sys 0m0,007s exit code 1 test_declare2 (f is string) real 0m0,039s user 0m0,035s sys 0m0,003s exit code 1 test_type (f is string) real 0m2,394s user 0m1,679s sys 0m1,035s exit code 1 test_type2 (f is string) real 0m0,851s user 0m0,554s sys 0m0,294s exit code 1

所以declare -F似乎是最好的解决方案。

挖掘一根旧柱子……但我最近使用了这个方法，并测试了以下两种替代方法:

test_declare () {
    a () { echo 'a' ;}

    declare -f a > /dev/null
}

test_type () {
    a () { echo 'a' ;}
    type a | grep -q 'is a function'
}

echo 'declare'
time for i in $(seq 1 1000); do test_declare; done
echo 'type'
time for i in $(seq 1 100); do test_type; done

这产生了:

real    0m0.064s
user    0m0.040s
sys     0m0.020s
type

real    0m2.769s
user    0m1.620s
sys     0m1.130s

声明要快得多!

来自我对另一个答案的评论(当我回到这个页面时，我总是忽略这个答案)

$ fn_exists() { test x$(type -t $1) = xfunction; }
$ fn_exists func1 && echo yes || echo no
no
$ func1() { echo hi from func1; }
$ func1
hi from func1
$ fn_exists func1 && echo yes || echo no
yes