var clone = Object.assign({}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3});
delete clone.b;

或者如果你接受属性为未定义:

var clone = Object.assign({}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}, {b: undefined});

我不知道你到底想用这个做什么，所以我不确定这是否适合你，但我只是做了以下工作，它适用于我的用例:

const newObj ={...obj, [key]: undefined}

也许是这样的:

var copy = Object.assign({}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3})
delete copy.c;

这样够好吗?或者说c不能被复制?

下面是我对Typescript的看法，稍微源自@Paul的回答，并使用reduce代替。

function objectWithoutKey(object: object, keys: string[]) {
    return keys.reduce((previousValue, currentValue) => {
        // @ts-ignore
        const {[currentValue]: undefined, ...clean} = previousValue;
        return clean
    }, object)
}

// usage
console.log(objectWithoutKey({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}, ['a', 'b']))

var clone = Object.assign({}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3});
delete clone.b;

或者如果你接受属性为未定义:

var clone = Object.assign({}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}, {b: undefined});

Lodash省略

let source = //{a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, ..., z:26}
let copySansProperty = _.omit(source, 'b');
// {a: 1, c: 3, ..., z:26}