我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
我还没有足够的代表来评论或投票他的解决方案,但他的答案对我来说非常有效。我遇到的唯一问题是参数以单引号结尾(所以我把它们去掉了)。
我还添加了一些示例用法和帮助文本。我将在这里附上我略微扩展的版本:
#!/bin/bash
# getopt example
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
HELP_TEXT=\
" USAGE:\n
Accepts - and -- flags, can specify options that require a value, and can be in any order. A double-hyphen (--) will stop processing options.\n\n
Accepts the following forms:\n\n
getopt-example.sh -a -b -c value-for-c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -c value-for-c -a -b some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -abc some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh --along --blong --clong value-for-c -a -b -c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh some-arg --clong value-for-c\n
getopt-example.sh
"
aflag=false
bflag=false
cargument=""
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc:h\? -l along,blong,help,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag=true ;;
-b|--blong) bflag=true ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
-h|--help|-\?) echo -e $HELP_TEXT; exit;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# to remove the single quotes around arguments, pipe the output into:
# | sed -e "s/^'\\|'$//g" (just leading/trailing) or | sed -e "s/'//g" (all)
echo aflag=${aflag}
echo bflag=${bflag}
echo cargument=${cargument}
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo arg=$1
shift
if [[ $aflag == true ]]; then
echo a is true
fi
done
其他回答
例如,如果所有长选项都有唯一且匹配的首字符作为短选项
./slamm --chaos 23 --plenty test -quiet
和
./slamm -c 23 -p test -q
你可以在getopts重写$args之前使用它:
# change long options to short options
for arg; do
[[ "${arg:0:1}" == "-" ]] && delim="" || delim="\""
if [ "${arg:0:2}" == "--" ];
then args="${args} -${arg:2:1}"
else args="${args} ${delim}${arg}${delim}"
fi
done
# reset the incoming args
eval set -- $args
# proceed as usual
while getopts ":b:la:h" OPTION; do
.....
谢谢mtvee的灵感;-)
使用带有短/长选项和参数的getopts
适用于所有组合,例如:
Foobar -f——bar Foobar——foo -b Foobar -bf -bar - Foobar foobar -fbFBAshorty——bar -FB——arguments=longhorn foobar -fA "text shorty" -B——arguments="text longhorn" bash foobar -F—barfoo sh foobar - b——foobar -… bash ./foobar -F——bar
本例中的一些声明
Options=$@
Optnum=$#
sfoo='no '
sbar='no '
sfoobar='no '
sbarfoo='no '
sarguments='no '
sARG=empty
lfoo='no '
lbar='no '
lfoobar='no '
lbarfoo='no '
larguments='no '
lARG=empty
Usage函数看起来如何
function _usage()
{
###### U S A G E : Help and ERROR ######
cat <<EOF
foobar $Options
$*
Usage: foobar <[options]>
Options:
-b --bar Set bar to yes ($foo)
-f --foo Set foo to yes ($bart)
-h --help Show this message
-A --arguments=... Set arguments to yes ($arguments) AND get ARGUMENT ($ARG)
-B --barfoo Set barfoo to yes ($barfoo)
-F --foobar Set foobar to yes ($foobar)
EOF
}
[ $# = 0 ] && _usage " >>>>>>>> no options given "
具有长/短标志和长参数的getop
while getopts ':bfh-A:BF' OPTION ; do
case "$OPTION" in
b ) sbar=yes ;;
f ) sfoo=yes ;;
h ) _usage ;;
A ) sarguments=yes;sARG="$OPTARG" ;;
B ) sbarfoo=yes ;;
F ) sfoobar=yes ;;
- ) [ $OPTIND -ge 1 ] && optind=$(expr $OPTIND - 1 ) || optind=$OPTIND
eval OPTION="\$$optind"
OPTARG=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f2)
OPTION=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f1)
case $OPTION in
--foo ) lfoo=yes ;;
--bar ) lbar=yes ;;
--foobar ) lfoobar=yes ;;
--barfoo ) lbarfoo=yes ;;
--help ) _usage ;;
--arguments ) larguments=yes;lARG="$OPTARG" ;;
* ) _usage " Long: >>>>>>>> invalid options (long) " ;;
esac
OPTIND=1
shift
;;
? ) _usage "Short: >>>>>>>> invalid options (short) " ;;
esac
done
输出
##################################################################
echo "----------------------------------------------------------"
echo "RESULT short-foo : $sfoo long-foo : $lfoo"
echo "RESULT short-bar : $sbar long-bar : $lbar"
echo "RESULT short-foobar : $sfoobar long-foobar : $lfoobar"
echo "RESULT short-barfoo : $sbarfoo long-barfoo : $lbarfoo"
echo "RESULT short-arguments: $sarguments with Argument = \"$sARG\" long-arguments: $larguments and $lARG"
将上述内容组合成一个内聚脚本
#!/bin/bash
# foobar: getopts with short and long options AND arguments
function _cleanup ()
{
unset -f _usage _cleanup ; return 0
}
## Clear out nested functions on exit
trap _cleanup INT EXIT RETURN
###### some declarations for this example ######
Options=$@
Optnum=$#
sfoo='no '
sbar='no '
sfoobar='no '
sbarfoo='no '
sarguments='no '
sARG=empty
lfoo='no '
lbar='no '
lfoobar='no '
lbarfoo='no '
larguments='no '
lARG=empty
function _usage()
{
###### U S A G E : Help and ERROR ######
cat <<EOF
foobar $Options
$*
Usage: foobar <[options]>
Options:
-b --bar Set bar to yes ($foo)
-f --foo Set foo to yes ($bart)
-h --help Show this message
-A --arguments=... Set arguments to yes ($arguments) AND get ARGUMENT ($ARG)
-B --barfoo Set barfoo to yes ($barfoo)
-F --foobar Set foobar to yes ($foobar)
EOF
}
[ $# = 0 ] && _usage " >>>>>>>> no options given "
##################################################################
####### "getopts" with: short options AND long options #######
####### AND short/long arguments #######
while getopts ':bfh-A:BF' OPTION ; do
case "$OPTION" in
b ) sbar=yes ;;
f ) sfoo=yes ;;
h ) _usage ;;
A ) sarguments=yes;sARG="$OPTARG" ;;
B ) sbarfoo=yes ;;
F ) sfoobar=yes ;;
- ) [ $OPTIND -ge 1 ] && optind=$(expr $OPTIND - 1 ) || optind=$OPTIND
eval OPTION="\$$optind"
OPTARG=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f2)
OPTION=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f1)
case $OPTION in
--foo ) lfoo=yes ;;
--bar ) lbar=yes ;;
--foobar ) lfoobar=yes ;;
--barfoo ) lbarfoo=yes ;;
--help ) _usage ;;
--arguments ) larguments=yes;lARG="$OPTARG" ;;
* ) _usage " Long: >>>>>>>> invalid options (long) " ;;
esac
OPTIND=1
shift
;;
? ) _usage "Short: >>>>>>>> invalid options (short) " ;;
esac
done
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "abc:d:" flag
do
case $flag in
a) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
b) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
c) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
d) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
echo "[otheropts]==> $@"
exit
.
#!/bin/bash
until [ -z "$1" ]; do
case $1 in
"--dlong")
shift
if [ "${1:1:0}" != "-" ]
then
echo "==> dlong $1"
shift
fi;;
*) echo "==> other $1"; shift;;
esac
done
exit
一个简单的DIY,只获得长名称的参数:
Use:
$ ./test-args.sh --a1 a1 --a2 "a 2" --a3 --a4= --a5=a5 --a6="a 6"
a1 = "a1"
a2 = "a 2"
a3 = "TRUE"
a4 = ""
a5 = "a5"
a6 = "a 6"
a7 = ""
脚本:
#!/bin/bash
function main() {
ARGS=`getArgs "$@"`
a1=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a1`
a2=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a2`
a3=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a3`
a4=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a4`
a5=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a5`
a6=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a6`
a7=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a7`
echo "a1 = \"$a1\""
echo "a2 = \"$a2\""
echo "a3 = \"$a3\""
echo "a4 = \"$a4\""
echo "a5 = \"$a5\""
echo "a6 = \"$a6\""
echo "a7 = \"$a7\""
exit 0
}
function getArgs() {
for arg in "$@"; do
echo "$arg"
done
}
function getNamedArg() {
ARG_NAME=$1
sed --regexp-extended --quiet --expression="
s/^--$ARG_NAME=(.*)\$/\1/p # Get arguments in format '--arg=value': [s]ubstitute '--arg=value' by 'value', and [p]rint
/^--$ARG_NAME\$/ { # Get arguments in format '--arg value' ou '--arg'
n # - [n]ext, because in this format, if value exists, it will be the next argument
/^--/! p # - If next doesn't starts with '--', it is the value of the actual argument
/^--/ { # - If next do starts with '--', it is the next argument and the actual argument is a boolean one
# Then just repla[c]ed by TRUE
c TRUE
}
}
"
}
main "$@"
公认的答案很好地指出了bash内置getopts的所有缺点。答案以:
因此,虽然可以编写更多的代码来解决长选项支持不足的问题,但工作量要大得多,并且在一定程度上违背了使用getopt解析器来简化代码的目的。
尽管我原则上同意这种说法,但我觉得我们在各种脚本中实现这个特性的次数证明,我们应该花一些精力来创建一个“标准化”的、经过良好测试的解决方案。
因此,我通过在纯bash中实现getopts_long“升级”了内置在getopts中的bash,没有外部依赖。该函数的使用与内置的getopts 100%兼容。
通过在脚本中包含getopts_long(在GitHub上托管),可以简单地实现原始问题的答案:
source "${PATH_TO}/getopts_long.bash"
while getopts_long ':c: copyfile:' OPTKEY; do
case ${OPTKEY} in
'c'|'copyfile')
echo 'file supplied -- ${OPTARG}'
;;
'?')
echo "INVALID OPTION -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
':')
echo "MISSING ARGUMENT for option -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
*)
echo "Misconfigured OPTSPEC or uncaught option -- ${OPTKEY}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
shift $(( OPTIND - 1 ))
[[ "${1}" == "--" ]] && shift