我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts，但是像在Perl中一样，我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法，这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面，这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情，但使用getopts，我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
我还没有足够的代表来评论或投票他的解决方案，但他的答案对我来说非常有效。我遇到的唯一问题是参数以单引号结尾(所以我把它们去掉了)。
我还添加了一些示例用法和帮助文本。我将在这里附上我略微扩展的版本:
#!/bin/bash
# getopt example
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
HELP_TEXT=\
" USAGE:\n
Accepts - and -- flags, can specify options that require a value, and can be in any order. A double-hyphen (--) will stop processing options.\n\n
Accepts the following forms:\n\n
getopt-example.sh -a -b -c value-for-c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -c value-for-c -a -b some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -abc some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh --along --blong --clong value-for-c -a -b -c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh some-arg --clong value-for-c\n
getopt-example.sh
"
aflag=false
bflag=false
cargument=""
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc:h\? -l along,blong,help,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag=true ;;
-b|--blong) bflag=true ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
-h|--help|-\?) echo -e $HELP_TEXT; exit;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# to remove the single quotes around arguments, pipe the output into:
# | sed -e "s/^'\\|'$//g" (just leading/trailing) or | sed -e "s/'//g" (all)
echo aflag=${aflag}
echo bflag=${bflag}
echo cargument=${cargument}
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo arg=$1
shift
if [[ $aflag == true ]]; then
echo a is true
fi
done
其他回答
下面是一个实际使用长选项的getopt的示例:
aflag=no
bflag=no
cargument=none
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc: -l along,blong,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag="yes" ;;
-b|--blong) bflag="yes" ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
我只是偶尔写一些shell脚本，但没有实践经验，所以任何反馈都很感激。
使用@Arvid Requate提出的策略，我们注意到一些用户错误。忘记包含值的用户会意外地将下一个选项的名称视为值:
./getopts_test.sh --loglevel= --toc=TRUE
将导致"loglevel"的值被视为"——toc=TRUE"。这可以 被避免的。
我从http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035关于手动解析的讨论中改编了一些关于检查CLI用户错误的想法。我在处理"-"和"——"参数时插入了错误检查。
然后我开始摆弄语法，所以这里的任何错误都是我的错，而不是原始作者的错。
我的方法可以帮助那些喜欢输入带等号或不带等号的长字符的用户。也就是说，它对“——loglevel 9”的响应应该与“——loglevel=9”的响应相同。在——/space方法中，不可能确定用户是否忘记了一个参数，因此需要进行一些猜测。
如果用户使用长/等号格式(——opt=)，则=后的空格会触发错误，因为没有提供参数。 如果user有长/空格参数(——opt)，如果后面没有参数(命令结束)或参数以破折号开头，该脚本将导致失败。
In case you are starting out on this, there is an interesting difference between "--opt=value" and "--opt value" formats. With the equal sign, the command line argument is seen as "opt=value" and the work to handle that is string parsing, to separate at the "=". In contrast, with "--opt value", the name of the argument is "opt" and we have the challenge of getting the next value supplied in the command line. That's where @Arvid Requate used ${!OPTIND}, the indirect reference. I still don't understand that, well, at all, and comments in BashFAQ seem to warn against that style (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006). BTW, I don't think previous poster's comments about importance of OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) are correct. I mean to say, I see no harm from omitting it.
在该脚本的最新版本中，flag -v表示详细打印输出。
将其保存在一个名为“cli-5.sh”的文件中，使其可执行，其中任何一个都将以预期的方式工作或失败
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc TRUE
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc=TRUE
./cli-5.sh --loglevel 7
./cli-5.sh --loglevel=8
./cli-5.sh -l9
./cli-5.sh --toc FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh --toc=FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh -l99 -t yyy
./cli-5.sh -l 99 -t yyy
下面是对用户intpu进行错误检查的示例输出
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc --loglevel=77
ERROR: toc value must not have dash at beginning
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc= --loglevel=77
ERROR: value for toc undefined
您应该考虑打开-v，因为它会打印OPTIND和OPTARG的内部内容
#/usr/bin/env bash
## Paul Johnson
## 20171016
##
## Combines ideas from
## https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
## by @Arvid Requate, and http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035
# What I don't understand yet:
# In @Arvid REquate's answer, we have
# val="${!OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
# this works, but I don't understand it!
die() {
printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
exit 1
}
printparse(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'Parse: %s%s%s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" >&2;
fi
}
showme(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'VERBOSE: %s\n' "$1" >&2;
fi
}
VERBOSE=0
loglevel=0
toc="TRUE"
optspec=":vhl:t:-:"
while getopts "$optspec" OPTCHAR; do
showme "OPTARG: ${OPTARG[*]}"
showme "OPTIND: ${OPTIND[*]}"
case "${OPTCHAR}" in
-)
case "${OPTARG}" in
loglevel) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) # CAUTION! no effect?
printparse "--${OPTARG}" " " "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
shift
;;
loglevel=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
printparse "--${opt}" "=" "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
## shift CAUTION don't shift this, fails othewise
else
die "ERROR: $opt value must be supplied"
fi
;;
toc) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) #??
printparse "--${opt}" " " "${val}"
toc="${val}"
shift
;;
toc=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
toc=${val}
printparse "--$opt" " -> " "$toc"
##shift ## NO! dont shift this
else
die "ERROR: value for $opt undefined"
fi
;;
help)
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" = 1 ] && [ "${optspec:0:1}" != ":" ]; then
echo "Unknown option --${OPTARG}" >&2
fi
;;
esac;;
h|-\?|--help)
## must rewrite this for all of the arguments
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
l)
loglevel=${OPTARG}
printparse "-l" " " "${loglevel}"
;;
t)
toc=${OPTARG}
;;
v)
VERBOSE=1
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" != 1 ] || [ "${optspec:0:1}" = ":" ]; then
echo "Non-option argument: '-${OPTARG}'" >&2
fi
;;
esac
done
echo "
After Parsing values
"
echo "loglevel $loglevel"
echo "toc $toc"
我还没有足够的代表来评论或投票他的解决方案，但他的答案对我来说非常有效。我遇到的唯一问题是参数以单引号结尾(所以我把它们去掉了)。
我还添加了一些示例用法和帮助文本。我将在这里附上我略微扩展的版本:
#!/bin/bash
# getopt example
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
HELP_TEXT=\
" USAGE:\n
Accepts - and -- flags, can specify options that require a value, and can be in any order. A double-hyphen (--) will stop processing options.\n\n
Accepts the following forms:\n\n
getopt-example.sh -a -b -c value-for-c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -c value-for-c -a -b some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -abc some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh --along --blong --clong value-for-c -a -b -c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh some-arg --clong value-for-c\n
getopt-example.sh
"
aflag=false
bflag=false
cargument=""
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc:h\? -l along,blong,help,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag=true ;;
-b|--blong) bflag=true ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
-h|--help|-\?) echo -e $HELP_TEXT; exit;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# to remove the single quotes around arguments, pipe the output into:
# | sed -e "s/^'\\|'$//g" (just leading/trailing) or | sed -e "s/'//g" (all)
echo aflag=${aflag}
echo bflag=${bflag}
echo cargument=${cargument}
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo arg=$1
shift
if [[ $aflag == true ]]; then
echo a is true
fi
done
我是这样解决的:
# A string with command options
options=$@
# An array with all the arguments
arguments=($options)
# Loop index
index=0
for argument in $options
do
# Incrementing index
index=`expr $index + 1`
# The conditions
case $argument in
-a) echo "key $argument value ${arguments[index]}" ;;
-abc) echo "key $argument value ${arguments[index]}" ;;
esac
done
exit;
我是不是太笨了?Getopt和getopts太让人困惑了。
内置的getopts只解析短选项(ksh93除外)， 但是您仍然可以添加几行脚本来使getopts处理长选项。
以下是在http://www.uxora.com/unix/shell-script/22-handle-long-options-with-getopts中找到的部分代码
#== set short options ==#
SCRIPT_OPTS=':fbF:B:-:h'
#== set long options associated with short one ==#
typeset -A ARRAY_OPTS
ARRAY_OPTS=(
[foo]=f
[bar]=b
[foobar]=F
[barfoo]=B
[help]=h
[man]=h
)
#== parse options ==#
while getopts ${SCRIPT_OPTS} OPTION ; do
#== translate long options to short ==#
if [[ "x$OPTION" == "x-" ]]; then
LONG_OPTION=$OPTARG
LONG_OPTARG=$(echo $LONG_OPTION | grep "=" | cut -d'=' -f2)
LONG_OPTIND=-1
[[ "x$LONG_OPTARG" = "x" ]] && LONG_OPTIND=$OPTIND || LONG_OPTION=$(echo $OPTARG | cut -d'=' -f1)
[[ $LONG_OPTIND -ne -1 ]] && eval LONG_OPTARG="\$$LONG_OPTIND"
OPTION=${ARRAY_OPTS[$LONG_OPTION]}
[[ "x$OPTION" = "x" ]] && OPTION="?" OPTARG="-$LONG_OPTION"
if [[ $( echo "${SCRIPT_OPTS}" | grep -c "${OPTION}:" ) -eq 1 ]]; then
if [[ "x${LONG_OPTARG}" = "x" ]] || [[ "${LONG_OPTARG}" = -* ]]; then
OPTION=":" OPTARG="-$LONG_OPTION"
else
OPTARG="$LONG_OPTARG";
if [[ $LONG_OPTIND -ne -1 ]]; then
[[ $OPTIND -le $Optnum ]] && OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND+1 ))
shift $OPTIND
OPTIND=1
fi
fi
fi
fi
#== options follow by another option instead of argument ==#
if [[ "x${OPTION}" != "x:" ]] && [[ "x${OPTION}" != "x?" ]] && [[ "${OPTARG}" = -* ]]; then
OPTARG="$OPTION" OPTION=":"
fi
#== manage options ==#
case "$OPTION" in
f ) foo=1 bar=0 ;;
b ) foo=0 bar=1 ;;
B ) barfoo=${OPTARG} ;;
F ) foobar=1 && foobar_name=${OPTARG} ;;
h ) usagefull && exit 0 ;;
: ) echo "${SCRIPT_NAME}: -$OPTARG: option requires an argument" >&2 && usage >&2 && exit 99 ;;
? ) echo "${SCRIPT_NAME}: -$OPTARG: unknown option" >&2 && usage >&2 && exit 99 ;;
esac
done
shift $((${OPTIND} - 1))
下面是一个测试:
# Short options test
$ ./foobar_any_getopts.sh -bF "Hello world" -B 6 file1 file2
foo=0 bar=1
barfoo=6
foobar=1 foobar_name=Hello world
files=file1 file2
# Long and short options test
$ ./foobar_any_getopts.sh --bar -F Hello --barfoo 6 file1 file2
foo=0 bar=1
barfoo=6
foobar=1 foobar_name=Hello
files=file1 file2
另外，在最近的Korn Shell ksh93中，getopts可以自然地解析长选项，甚至显示类似的手册页。(参见http://www.uxora.com/unix/shell-script/20-getopts-with-man-page-and-long-options)
