我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
我还没有足够的代表来评论或投票他的解决方案,但他的答案对我来说非常有效。我遇到的唯一问题是参数以单引号结尾(所以我把它们去掉了)。
我还添加了一些示例用法和帮助文本。我将在这里附上我略微扩展的版本:
#!/bin/bash
# getopt example
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
HELP_TEXT=\
" USAGE:\n
Accepts - and -- flags, can specify options that require a value, and can be in any order. A double-hyphen (--) will stop processing options.\n\n
Accepts the following forms:\n\n
getopt-example.sh -a -b -c value-for-c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -c value-for-c -a -b some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -abc some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh --along --blong --clong value-for-c -a -b -c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh some-arg --clong value-for-c\n
getopt-example.sh
"
aflag=false
bflag=false
cargument=""
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc:h\? -l along,blong,help,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag=true ;;
-b|--blong) bflag=true ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
-h|--help|-\?) echo -e $HELP_TEXT; exit;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# to remove the single quotes around arguments, pipe the output into:
# | sed -e "s/^'\\|'$//g" (just leading/trailing) or | sed -e "s/'//g" (all)
echo aflag=${aflag}
echo bflag=${bflag}
echo cargument=${cargument}
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo arg=$1
shift
if [[ $aflag == true ]]; then
echo a is true
fi
done
其他回答
如果这就是您想要调用脚本的方式
myscript.sh --input1 "ABC" --input2 "PQR" --input2 "XYZ"
然后,您可以使用getopt和——longoptions来实现这个最简单的方法
试试这个,希望对你有用
# Read command line options
ARGUMENT_LIST=(
"input1"
"input2"
"input3"
)
# read arguments
opts=$(getopt \
--longoptions "$(printf "%s:," "${ARGUMENT_LIST[@]}")" \
--name "$(basename "$0")" \
--options "" \
-- "$@"
)
echo $opts
eval set --$opts
while true; do
case "$1" in
--input1)
shift
empId=$1
;;
--input2)
shift
fromDate=$1
;;
--input3)
shift
toDate=$1
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
esac
shift
done
我只是偶尔写一些shell脚本,但没有实践经验,所以任何反馈都很感激。
使用@Arvid Requate提出的策略,我们注意到一些用户错误。忘记包含值的用户会意外地将下一个选项的名称视为值:
./getopts_test.sh --loglevel= --toc=TRUE
将导致"loglevel"的值被视为"——toc=TRUE"。这可以 被避免的。
我从http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035关于手动解析的讨论中改编了一些关于检查CLI用户错误的想法。我在处理"-"和"——"参数时插入了错误检查。
然后我开始摆弄语法,所以这里的任何错误都是我的错,而不是原始作者的错。
我的方法可以帮助那些喜欢输入带等号或不带等号的长字符的用户。也就是说,它对“——loglevel 9”的响应应该与“——loglevel=9”的响应相同。在——/space方法中,不可能确定用户是否忘记了一个参数,因此需要进行一些猜测。
如果用户使用长/等号格式(——opt=),则=后的空格会触发错误,因为没有提供参数。 如果user有长/空格参数(——opt),如果后面没有参数(命令结束)或参数以破折号开头,该脚本将导致失败。
In case you are starting out on this, there is an interesting difference between "--opt=value" and "--opt value" formats. With the equal sign, the command line argument is seen as "opt=value" and the work to handle that is string parsing, to separate at the "=". In contrast, with "--opt value", the name of the argument is "opt" and we have the challenge of getting the next value supplied in the command line. That's where @Arvid Requate used ${!OPTIND}, the indirect reference. I still don't understand that, well, at all, and comments in BashFAQ seem to warn against that style (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006). BTW, I don't think previous poster's comments about importance of OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) are correct. I mean to say, I see no harm from omitting it.
在该脚本的最新版本中,flag -v表示详细打印输出。
将其保存在一个名为“cli-5.sh”的文件中,使其可执行,其中任何一个都将以预期的方式工作或失败
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc TRUE
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc=TRUE
./cli-5.sh --loglevel 7
./cli-5.sh --loglevel=8
./cli-5.sh -l9
./cli-5.sh --toc FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh --toc=FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh -l99 -t yyy
./cli-5.sh -l 99 -t yyy
下面是对用户intpu进行错误检查的示例输出
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc --loglevel=77
ERROR: toc value must not have dash at beginning
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc= --loglevel=77
ERROR: value for toc undefined
您应该考虑打开-v,因为它会打印OPTIND和OPTARG的内部内容
#/usr/bin/env bash
## Paul Johnson
## 20171016
##
## Combines ideas from
## https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
## by @Arvid Requate, and http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035
# What I don't understand yet:
# In @Arvid REquate's answer, we have
# val="${!OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
# this works, but I don't understand it!
die() {
printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
exit 1
}
printparse(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'Parse: %s%s%s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" >&2;
fi
}
showme(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'VERBOSE: %s\n' "$1" >&2;
fi
}
VERBOSE=0
loglevel=0
toc="TRUE"
optspec=":vhl:t:-:"
while getopts "$optspec" OPTCHAR; do
showme "OPTARG: ${OPTARG[*]}"
showme "OPTIND: ${OPTIND[*]}"
case "${OPTCHAR}" in
-)
case "${OPTARG}" in
loglevel) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) # CAUTION! no effect?
printparse "--${OPTARG}" " " "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
shift
;;
loglevel=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
printparse "--${opt}" "=" "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
## shift CAUTION don't shift this, fails othewise
else
die "ERROR: $opt value must be supplied"
fi
;;
toc) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) #??
printparse "--${opt}" " " "${val}"
toc="${val}"
shift
;;
toc=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
toc=${val}
printparse "--$opt" " -> " "$toc"
##shift ## NO! dont shift this
else
die "ERROR: value for $opt undefined"
fi
;;
help)
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" = 1 ] && [ "${optspec:0:1}" != ":" ]; then
echo "Unknown option --${OPTARG}" >&2
fi
;;
esac;;
h|-\?|--help)
## must rewrite this for all of the arguments
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
l)
loglevel=${OPTARG}
printparse "-l" " " "${loglevel}"
;;
t)
toc=${OPTARG}
;;
v)
VERBOSE=1
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" != 1 ] || [ "${optspec:0:1}" = ":" ]; then
echo "Non-option argument: '-${OPTARG}'" >&2
fi
;;
esac
done
echo "
After Parsing values
"
echo "loglevel $loglevel"
echo "toc $toc"
内置的getopts命令仍然仅限于单字符选项。
现在有(或者曾经有)一个外部程序getopt,它可以重新组织一组选项,使其更容易解析。你也可以调整这种设计来处理长选项。使用示例:
aflag=no
bflag=no
flist=""
set -- $(getopt abf: "$@")
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case "$1" in
(-a) aflag=yes;;
(-b) bflag=yes;;
(-f) flist="$flist $2"; shift;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# Process remaining non-option arguments
...
您可以对getoptlong命令使用类似的方案。
请注意,外部getopt程序的基本弱点是难以处理其中包含空格的参数,以及难以准确地保留这些空格。这就是内置getopts优越的原因,尽管它只能处理单字母选项。
如果你不想要getopt依赖,你可以这样做:
while test $# -gt 0
do
case $1 in
# Normal option processing
-h | --help)
# usage and help
;;
-v | --version)
# version info
;;
# ...
# Special cases
--)
break
;;
--*)
# error unknown (long) option $1
;;
-?)
# error unknown (short) option $1
;;
# FUN STUFF HERE:
# Split apart combined short options
-*)
split=$1
shift
set -- $(echo "$split" | cut -c 2- | sed 's/./-& /g') "$@"
continue
;;
# Done with options
*)
break
;;
esac
# for testing purposes:
echo "$1"
shift
done
当然,这样你就不能使用长样式选项。如果你想添加缩短的版本(例如——verbos而不是——verbose),那么你需要手动添加这些。
但是如果您希望获得getopts功能和长选项,这是一种简单的方法。
我也把这个片段作为一个主旨。
改进的解决方案:
# translate long options to short
# Note: This enable long options but disable "--?*" in $OPTARG, or disable long options after "--" in option fields.
for ((i=1;$#;i++)) ; do
case "$1" in
--)
# [ ${args[$((i-1))]} == ... ] || EndOpt=1 ;;& # DIRTY: we still can handle some execptions...
EndOpt=1 ;;&
--version) ((EndOpt)) && args[$i]="$1" || args[$i]="-V";;
# default case : short option use the first char of the long option:
--?*) ((EndOpt)) && args[$i]="$1" || args[$i]="-${1:2:1}";;
# pass through anything else:
*) args[$i]="$1" ;;
esac
shift
done
# reset the translated args
set -- "${args[@]}"
function usage {
echo "Usage: $0 [options] files" >&2
exit $1
}
# now we can process with getopt
while getopts ":hvVc:" opt; do
case $opt in
h) usage ;;
v) VERBOSE=true ;;
V) echo $Version ; exit ;;
c) source $OPTARG ;;
\?) echo "unrecognized option: -$opt" ; usage -1 ;;
:)
echo "option -$OPTARG requires an argument"
usage -1
;;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
[[ "$1" == "--" ]] && shift