我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
公认的答案很好地指出了bash内置getopts的所有缺点。答案以:
因此,虽然可以编写更多的代码来解决长选项支持不足的问题,但工作量要大得多,并且在一定程度上违背了使用getopt解析器来简化代码的目的。
尽管我原则上同意这种说法,但我觉得我们在各种脚本中实现这个特性的次数证明,我们应该花一些精力来创建一个“标准化”的、经过良好测试的解决方案。
因此,我通过在纯bash中实现getopts_long“升级”了内置在getopts中的bash,没有外部依赖。该函数的使用与内置的getopts 100%兼容。
通过在脚本中包含getopts_long(在GitHub上托管),可以简单地实现原始问题的答案:
source "${PATH_TO}/getopts_long.bash"
while getopts_long ':c: copyfile:' OPTKEY; do
case ${OPTKEY} in
'c'|'copyfile')
echo 'file supplied -- ${OPTARG}'
;;
'?')
echo "INVALID OPTION -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
':')
echo "MISSING ARGUMENT for option -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
*)
echo "Misconfigured OPTSPEC or uncaught option -- ${OPTKEY}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
shift $(( OPTIND - 1 ))
[[ "${1}" == "--" ]] && shift
其他回答
getopt and getopts are different beasts, and people seem to have a bit of misunderstanding of what they do. getopts is a built-in command to bash to process command-line options in a loop and assign each found option and value in turn to built-in variables, so you can further process them. getopt, however, is an external utility program, and it doesn't actually process your options for you the way that e.g. bash getopts, the Perl Getopt module or the Python optparse/argparse modules do. All that getopt does is canonicalize the options that are passed in — i.e. convert them to a more standard form, so that it's easier for a shell script to process them. For example, an application of getopt might convert the following:
myscript -ab infile.txt -ooutfile.txt
到这个:
myscript -a -b -o outfile.txt infile.txt
你必须自己进行实际的处理。如果你对指定选项的方式做了各种限制,你根本不必使用getopt:
每个参数只放一个选项; 所有选项都在任何位置参数(即非选项参数)之前; 对于带值的选项(例如上面的-o),值必须作为一个单独的参数(在空格之后)。
为什么使用getopt而不是getopts?基本原因是只有GNU getopt支持长名称的命令行选项(GNU getopt是Linux上的默认设置。Mac OS X和FreeBSD提供了一个基本的但不是很有用的getopt,但GNU版本可以安装;见下文)。
例如,这里有一个使用GNU getopt的例子,来自我的一个名为javawrap的脚本:
# NOTE: This requires GNU getopt. On Mac OS X and FreeBSD, you have to install this
# separately; see below.
TEMP=$(getopt -o vdm: --long verbose,debug,memory:,debugfile:,minheap:,maxheap: \
-n 'javawrap' -- "$@")
if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo "Terminating..." >&2 ; exit 1 ; fi
# Note the quotes around '$TEMP': they are essential!
eval set -- "$TEMP"
VERBOSE=false
DEBUG=false
MEMORY=
DEBUGFILE=
JAVA_MISC_OPT=
while true; do
case "$1" in
-v | --verbose ) VERBOSE=true; shift ;;
-d | --debug ) DEBUG=true; shift ;;
-m | --memory ) MEMORY="$2"; shift 2 ;;
--debugfile ) DEBUGFILE="$2"; shift 2 ;;
--minheap )
JAVA_MISC_OPT="$JAVA_MISC_OPT -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=$2"; shift 2 ;;
--maxheap )
JAVA_MISC_OPT="$JAVA_MISC_OPT -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio=$2"; shift 2 ;;
-- ) shift; break ;;
* ) break ;;
esac
done
这让你可以指定诸如——verbose -dm4096——minh=20——maxhe 40——debugfi="/Users/John Johnson/debug.txt"之类的选项。调用getopt的效果是将选项规范化为——verbose -d -m 4096——minheap 20——maxheap 40——debugfile "/Users/John Johnson/debug.txt",这样您就可以更容易地处理它们。“$1”和“$2”周围的引号很重要,因为它可以确保其中有空格的参数得到正确处理。
If you delete the first 9 lines (everything up through the eval set line), the code will still work! However, your code will be much pickier in what sorts of options it accepts: In particular, you'll have to specify all options in the "canonical" form described above. With the use of getopt, however, you can group single-letter options, use shorter non-ambiguous forms of long-options, use either the --file foo.txt or --file=foo.txt style, use either the -m 4096 or -m4096 style, mix options and non-options in any order, etc. getopt also outputs an error message if unrecognized or ambiguous options are found.
NOTE: There are actually two totally different versions of getopt, basic getopt and GNU getopt, with different features and different calling conventions.2 Basic getopt is quite broken: Not only does it not handle long options, it also can't even handle embedded spaces inside of arguments or empty arguments, whereas getopts does do this right. The above code will not work in basic getopt. GNU getopt is installed by default on Linux, but on Mac OS X and FreeBSD it needs to be installed separately. On Mac OS X, install MacPorts (http://www.macports.org) and then do sudo port install getopt to install GNU getopt (usually into /opt/local/bin), and make sure that /opt/local/bin is in your shell path ahead of /usr/bin. On FreeBSD, install misc/getopt.
为您自己的程序修改示例代码的快速指南:在前几行中,除了调用getopt的行外,其余都是“样板代码”,应该保持不变。您应该在-n之后更改程序名,在-o之后指定短选项,在——long之后指定长选项。在带值的选项后面加冒号。
最后,如果您看到的代码只是set而不是eval set,那么它是为BSD getopt编写的。您应该将其更改为使用eval set样式,这种样式适用于两个版本的getopt,而普通集不适用于GNU getopt。
实际上,ksh93中的getopts支持长名称选项,但是这个shell不像bash那样经常使用。在zsh中,使用zparseopts来获得这个功能。
从技术上讲,“GNU getopt”是一个用词不当的词;这个版本实际上是为Linux而不是GNU项目编写的。然而,它遵循所有的GNU约定,术语“GNU getopt”是常用的(例如在FreeBSD上)。
发明了另一个版本的轮子……
这个函数(希望)是一个posix兼容的普通bourne shell替换GNU getopt。它支持短/长选项,可以接受强制/可选/无参数,并且指定选项的方式几乎与GNU getopt相同,因此转换是微不足道的。
当然,要放入脚本中,这仍然是相当大的代码块,但它大约是众所周知的getopt_long shell函数的一半行数,并且在您只想替换现有的GNU getopt使用的情况下可能更可取。
这是相当新的代码,所以是YMMV(如果因为某种原因它实际上与POSIX不兼容,请务必告诉我——可移植性是一开始的意图,但我没有一个有用的POSIX测试环境)。
代码和示例用法如下:
#!/bin/sh
# posix_getopt shell function
# Author: Phil S.
# Version: 1.0
# Created: 2016-07-05
# URL: http://stackoverflow.com/a/37087374/324105
# POSIX-compatible argument quoting and parameter save/restore
# http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
# Usage:
# parameters=$(save "$@") # save the original parameters.
# eval "set -- ${parameters}" # restore the saved parameters.
save () {
local param
for param; do
printf %s\\n "$param" \
| sed "s/'/'\\\\''/g;1s/^/'/;\$s/\$/' \\\\/"
done
printf %s\\n " "
}
# Exit with status $1 after displaying error message $2.
exiterr () {
printf %s\\n "$2" >&2
exit $1
}
# POSIX-compatible command line option parsing.
# This function supports long options and optional arguments, and is
# a (largely-compatible) drop-in replacement for GNU getopt.
#
# Instead of:
# opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -- "$@")
# eval set -- ${opts}
#
# We instead use:
# opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
# eval "set -- ${opts}"
posix_getopt () { # args: "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@"
local shortopts longopts \
arg argtype getopt nonopt opt optchar optword suffix
shortopts="$1"
longopts="$2"
shift 2
getopt=
nonopt=
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
opt=
arg=
argtype=
case "$1" in
# '--' means don't parse the remaining options
( -- ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$@")"
shift $#
break
};;
# process short option
( -[!-]* ) { # -x[foo]
suffix=${1#-?} # foo
opt=${1%$suffix} # -x
optchar=${opt#-} # x
case "${shortopts}" in
( *${optchar}::* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *${optchar}:* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *${optchar}* ) { # no argument
argtype=none
arg=
shift
# Handle multiple no-argument parameters combined as
# -xyz instead of -x -y -z. If we have just shifted
# parameter -xyz, we now replace it with -yz (which
# will be processed in the next iteration).
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
eval "set -- $(save "-${suffix}")$(save "$@")"
fi
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# process long option
( --?* ) { # --xarg[=foo]
suffix=${1#*=} # foo (unless there was no =)
if [ "${suffix}" = "$1" ]; then
suffix=
fi
opt=${1%=$suffix} # --xarg
optword=${opt#--} # xarg
case ",${longopts}," in
( *,${optword}::,* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *,${optword}:,* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *,${optword},* ) { # no argument
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
exiterr 1 "--${optword} does not take an argument"
fi
argtype=none
arg=
shift
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# any other parameters starting with -
( -* ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
# remember non-option parameters
( * ) nonopt="${nonopt}$(save "$1")"; shift;;
esac
if [ -n "${opt}" ]; then
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$opt")"
case "${argtype}" in
( optional|required ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$arg")"
};;
esac
fi
done
# Generate function output, suitable for:
# eval "set -- $(posix_getopt ...)"
printf %s "${getopt}"
if [ -n "${nonopt}" ]; then
printf %s "$(save "--")${nonopt}"
fi
}
使用示例:
# Process command line options
shortopts="hvd:c::s::L:D"
longopts="help,version,directory:,client::,server::,load:,delete"
#opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -n "$(basename $0)" -- "$@")
opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
#eval set -- ${opts}
eval "set -- ${opts}"
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
( -- ) shift; break;;
( -h|--help ) help=1; shift; break;;
( -v|--version ) version_help=1; shift; break;;
( -d|--directory ) dir=$2; shift 2;;
( -c|--client ) useclient=1; client=$2; shift 2;;
( -s|--server ) startserver=1; server_name=$2; shift 2;;
( -L|--load ) load=$2; shift 2;;
( -D|--delete ) delete=1; shift;;
esac
done
else
shorthelp=1 # getopt returned (and reported) an error.
fi
内置的getopts命令仍然仅限于单字符选项。
现在有(或者曾经有)一个外部程序getopt,它可以重新组织一组选项,使其更容易解析。你也可以调整这种设计来处理长选项。使用示例:
aflag=no
bflag=no
flist=""
set -- $(getopt abf: "$@")
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case "$1" in
(-a) aflag=yes;;
(-b) bflag=yes;;
(-f) flist="$flist $2"; shift;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# Process remaining non-option arguments
...
您可以对getoptlong命令使用类似的方案。
请注意,外部getopt程序的基本弱点是难以处理其中包含空格的参数,以及难以准确地保留这些空格。这就是内置getopts优越的原因,尽管它只能处理单字母选项。
如果这就是您想要调用脚本的方式
myscript.sh --input1 "ABC" --input2 "PQR" --input2 "XYZ"
然后,您可以使用getopt和——longoptions来实现这个最简单的方法
试试这个,希望对你有用
# Read command line options
ARGUMENT_LIST=(
"input1"
"input2"
"input3"
)
# read arguments
opts=$(getopt \
--longoptions "$(printf "%s:," "${ARGUMENT_LIST[@]}")" \
--name "$(basename "$0")" \
--options "" \
-- "$@"
)
echo $opts
eval set --$opts
while true; do
case "$1" in
--input1)
shift
empId=$1
;;
--input2)
shift
fromDate=$1
;;
--input3)
shift
toDate=$1
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
esac
shift
done
内置的getopts不能做到这一点。有一个外部的getopt(1)程序可以做到这一点,但是您只能在Linux上从util-linux包中获得它。它附带一个示例脚本getop -parse.bash。
还有一个getopts_long被写成shell函数。