下面的代码在Ruby中是什么意思?

||=

它的语法有什么意义或原因吗?


当前回答

准确地说,||= b意味着“如果a是未定义的或假的(false或nil),将a设置为b并求值为(即返回)b,否则求值为a”。

其他人经常试图用||= b等价于|| a = b或a = a || b来说明这一点。这些等价有助于理解这个概念,但要注意,它们并非在所有条件下都是准确的。请允许我解释:

a ||= b ⇔ a || a = b? The behavior of these statements differs when a is an undefined local variable. In that case, a ||= b will set a to b (and evaluate to b), whereas a || a = b will raise NameError: undefined local variable or method 'a' for main:Object. a ||= b ⇔ a = a || b? The equivalency of these statements are often assumed, since a similar equivalence is true for other abbreviated assignment operators (i.e. +=,-=,*=,/=,%=,**=,&=,|=,^=,<<=, and >>=). However, for ||= the behavior of these statements may differ when a= is a method on an object and a is truthy. In that case, a ||= b will do nothing (other than evaluate to a), whereas a = a || b will call a=(a) on a's receiver. As others have pointed out, this can make a difference when calling a=a has side effects, such as adding keys to a hash. a ||= b ⇔ a = b unless a?? The behavior of these statements differs only in what they evaluate to when a is truthy. In that case, a = b unless a will evaluate to nil (though a will still not be set, as expected), whereas a ||= b will evaluate to a. a ||= b ⇔ defined?(a) ? (a || a = b) : (a = b)???? Still no. These statements can differ when a method_missing method exists which returns a truthy value for a. In this case, a ||= b will evaluate to whatever method_missing returns, and not attempt to set a, whereas defined?(a) ? (a || a = b) : (a = b) will set a to b and evaluate to b.

好的,好的,那么||= b等于什么?有办法在Ruby中表达这一点吗?

好吧,假设我没有忽略任何东西,我相信||= b在功能上等价于……(击鼓声)

begin
  a = nil if false
  a || a = b
end

坚持住!这不是第一个前面有noop的例子吗?嗯,不完全是。还记得我之前说的||= b只有当a是一个未定义的局部变量时,||= b才不等于|| a = b吗?如果为false,则a = nil确保a永远没有定义,即使这一行永远不会执行。Ruby中的局部变量是词法范围的。

其他回答

a ||= b

等于

a || a = b

而不是

a = a || b

因为您使用默认值定义哈希(对于任何未定义的键,哈希将返回默认值)

a = Hash.new(true) #Which is: {}

如果你使用:

a[10] ||= 10 #same as a[10] || a[10] = 10

A仍然是:

{}

但如果你这样写

a[10] = a[10] || 10

一个变成了:

{10 => true}

因为你已经在键10处赋值了它自己的值,默认为true,所以现在哈希是为键10定义的,而不是一开始就不执行赋值。

ruby-lang语法。正确的答案是查看ruby-lang文档。所有其他解释都令人困惑。

谷歌

"ruby-lang文档缩写赋值"。

Ruby-lang文档

https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.4.0/syntax/assignment_rdoc.html#label-Abbreviated+Assignment

一个常见的误解是,||= b并不等同于a = a || b,但它的行为就像|| a = b。

但这里有一个棘手的情况。如果a未定义,则|| a = 42将引发NameError,而||= 42将返回42。所以,它们似乎不是等价的表达式。

如果X没有值,它将被赋值为y,否则,它将保留它的原始值,在本例中为5:

irb(main):020:0> x = 5
=> 5
irb(main):021:0> y = 10
=> 10
irb(main):022:0> x ||= y
=> 5

# Now set x to nil. 

irb(main):025:0> x = nil
=> nil
irb(main):026:0> x ||= y
=> 10

准确地说,||= b意味着“如果a是未定义的或假的(false或nil),将a设置为b并求值为(即返回)b,否则求值为a”。

其他人经常试图用||= b等价于|| a = b或a = a || b来说明这一点。这些等价有助于理解这个概念,但要注意,它们并非在所有条件下都是准确的。请允许我解释:

a ||= b ⇔ a || a = b? The behavior of these statements differs when a is an undefined local variable. In that case, a ||= b will set a to b (and evaluate to b), whereas a || a = b will raise NameError: undefined local variable or method 'a' for main:Object. a ||= b ⇔ a = a || b? The equivalency of these statements are often assumed, since a similar equivalence is true for other abbreviated assignment operators (i.e. +=,-=,*=,/=,%=,**=,&=,|=,^=,<<=, and >>=). However, for ||= the behavior of these statements may differ when a= is a method on an object and a is truthy. In that case, a ||= b will do nothing (other than evaluate to a), whereas a = a || b will call a=(a) on a's receiver. As others have pointed out, this can make a difference when calling a=a has side effects, such as adding keys to a hash. a ||= b ⇔ a = b unless a?? The behavior of these statements differs only in what they evaluate to when a is truthy. In that case, a = b unless a will evaluate to nil (though a will still not be set, as expected), whereas a ||= b will evaluate to a. a ||= b ⇔ defined?(a) ? (a || a = b) : (a = b)???? Still no. These statements can differ when a method_missing method exists which returns a truthy value for a. In this case, a ||= b will evaluate to whatever method_missing returns, and not attempt to set a, whereas defined?(a) ? (a || a = b) : (a = b) will set a to b and evaluate to b.

好的,好的,那么||= b等于什么?有办法在Ruby中表达这一点吗?

好吧,假设我没有忽略任何东西,我相信||= b在功能上等价于……(击鼓声)

begin
  a = nil if false
  a || a = b
end

坚持住!这不是第一个前面有noop的例子吗?嗯,不完全是。还记得我之前说的||= b只有当a是一个未定义的局部变量时,||= b才不等于|| a = b吗?如果为false,则a = nil确保a永远没有定义,即使这一行永远不会执行。Ruby中的局部变量是词法范围的。