volatile关键字的作用是什么?在c++中它能解决什么问题?

就我而言,我从来没有明知肚明地需要它。


当前回答

在标准C中,使用volatile的一个地方是在信号处理程序中。事实上,在标准C中,在信号处理程序中可以安全地做的就是修改易失性sig_atomic_t变量,或者快速退出。事实上,AFAIK,这是标准C中唯一需要使用volatile来避免未定义行为的地方。

ISO/IEC 9899:2011 §7.14.1.1 The signal function ¶5 If the signal occurs other than as the result of calling the abort or raise function, the behavior is undefined if the signal handler refers to any object with static or thread storage duration that is not a lock-free atomic object other than by assigning a value to an object declared as volatile sig_atomic_t, or the signal handler calls any function in the standard library other than the abort function, the _Exit function, the quick_exit function, or the signal function with the first argument equal to the signal number corresponding to the signal that caused the invocation of the handler. Furthermore, if such a call to the signal function results in a SIG_ERR return, the value of errno is indeterminate.252) 252) If any signal is generated by an asynchronous signal handler, the behavior is undefined.

这意味着在标准C中,你可以这样写:

static volatile sig_atomic_t sig_num = 0;

static void sig_handler(int signum)
{
    signal(signum, sig_handler);
    sig_num = signum;
}

除此之外就没什么了。

POSIX对于在信号处理程序中可以做的事情要宽容得多,但仍然存在限制(其中一个限制是标准I/O库- printf()等-不能安全地使用)。

其他回答

在开发嵌入式系统或设备驱动程序时,需要使用Volatile,因为在这些驱动程序中需要读写内存映射的硬件设备。特定设备寄存器的内容随时都可能改变,所以你需要volatile关键字来确保这样的访问不会被编译器优化。

为嵌入式开发,我有一个循环,检查可以在中断处理程序中更改的变量。如果没有“volatile”,循环就变成了noop——就编译器所知,变量永远不会改变,所以它优化了检查。

同样的事情也适用于在更传统的环境中可能在不同线程中更改的变量,但在那里我们经常进行同步调用,因此编译器在优化方面没有那么自由。

一些处理器具有超过64位精度的浮点寄存器(例如。32位x86没有SSE,见Peter的评论)。这样,如果您对双精度数运行多次操作,实际上会得到比将每个中间结果截断为64位更高精度的答案。

这通常很好,但这意味着根据编译器如何分配寄存器和进行优化,对于完全相同的输入,完全相同的操作将得到不同的结果。如果您需要一致性,那么您可以使用volatile关键字强制每个操作返回内存。

它对于一些没有代数意义但减少浮点误差的算法也很有用,比如Kahan求和。代数上它是一个nop,所以它经常会被错误地优化除非一些中间变量是不稳定的。

我想引用Herb Sutter在GotW #95中的一句话,这有助于理解volatile变量的含义:

C++ volatile variables (which have no analog in languages like C# and Java) are always beyond the scope of this and any other article about the memory model and synchronization. That’s because C++ volatile variables aren’t about threads or communication at all and don’t interact with those things. Rather, a C++ volatile variable should be viewed as portal into a different universe beyond the language — a memory location that by definition does not obey the language’s memory model because that memory location is accessed by hardware (e.g., written to by a daughter card), have more than one address, or is otherwise “strange” and beyond the language. So C++ volatile variables are universally an exception to every guideline about synchronization because are always inherently “racy” and unsynchronizable using the normal tools (mutexes, atomics, etc.) and more generally exist outside all normal of the language and compiler including that they generally cannot be optimized by the compiler (because the compiler isn’t allowed to know their semantics; a volatile int vi; may not behave anything like a normal int, and you can’t even assume that code like vi = 5; int read_back = vi; is guaranteed to result in read_back == 5, or that code like int i = vi; int j = vi; that reads vi twice will result in i == j which will not be true if vi is a hardware counter for example).

在标准C中,使用volatile的一个地方是在信号处理程序中。事实上,在标准C中,在信号处理程序中可以安全地做的就是修改易失性sig_atomic_t变量,或者快速退出。事实上,AFAIK,这是标准C中唯一需要使用volatile来避免未定义行为的地方。

ISO/IEC 9899:2011 §7.14.1.1 The signal function ¶5 If the signal occurs other than as the result of calling the abort or raise function, the behavior is undefined if the signal handler refers to any object with static or thread storage duration that is not a lock-free atomic object other than by assigning a value to an object declared as volatile sig_atomic_t, or the signal handler calls any function in the standard library other than the abort function, the _Exit function, the quick_exit function, or the signal function with the first argument equal to the signal number corresponding to the signal that caused the invocation of the handler. Furthermore, if such a call to the signal function results in a SIG_ERR return, the value of errno is indeterminate.252) 252) If any signal is generated by an asynchronous signal handler, the behavior is undefined.

这意味着在标准C中,你可以这样写:

static volatile sig_atomic_t sig_num = 0;

static void sig_handler(int signum)
{
    signal(signum, sig_handler);
    sig_num = signum;
}

除此之外就没什么了。

POSIX对于在信号处理程序中可以做的事情要宽容得多,但仍然存在限制(其中一个限制是标准I/O库- printf()等-不能安全地使用)。