你可以这样做:

try:
    do_stuff()
except Exception, err:
    print(Exception, err)
    raise err

除了Aaron Hall的回答之外，如果您正在记录日志，但不想使用logging.exception()(因为它在ERROR级别记录日志)，您可以使用更低的级别并传递exc_info=True。如。

try:
    do_something_that_might_error()
except Exception:
    logging.info('General exception noted.', exc_info=True)

我在其他答案中没有看到这个。如果你出于某种原因传递一个Exception对象……

在Python 3.5+中，您可以使用traceback.TracebackException.from_exception()从Exception对象获取跟踪。例如:

import traceback


def stack_lvl_3():
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')


def stack_lvl_2():
    try:
        stack_lvl_3()
    except Exception as e:
        # raise
        return e


def stack_lvl_1():
    e = stack_lvl_2()
    return e

e = stack_lvl_1()

tb1 = traceback.TracebackException.from_exception(e)
print(''.join(tb1.format()))

然而，上面的代码导致:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "exc.py", line 10, in stack_lvl_2
    stack_lvl_3()
  File "exc.py", line 5, in stack_lvl_3
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')
Exception: ('a1', 'b2', 'c3')

这只是堆栈的两层，而不是在stack_lvl_2()中引发异常而没有被拦截(取消注释# raise行)时在屏幕上打印的内容。

根据我的理解，这是因为异常在被引发时只记录堆栈的当前级别，在本例中是stack_lvl_3()。当它在堆栈中往回传递时，更多的层被添加到它的__traceback__中。但是我们在stack_lvl_2()中拦截了它，这意味着它只能记录级别3和2。要获得打印在stdout上的完整跟踪，我们必须在最高(最低?)级别捕获它:

import traceback


def stack_lvl_3():
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')


def stack_lvl_2():
    stack_lvl_3()


def stack_lvl_1():
    stack_lvl_2()


try:
    stack_lvl_1()
except Exception as exc:
    tb = traceback.TracebackException.from_exception(exc)

print('Handled at stack lvl 0')
print(''.join(tb.stack.format()))

结果是:

Handled at stack lvl 0
  File "exc.py", line 17, in <module>
    stack_lvl_1()
  File "exc.py", line 13, in stack_lvl_1
    stack_lvl_2()
  File "exc.py", line 9, in stack_lvl_2
    stack_lvl_3()
  File "exc.py", line 5, in stack_lvl_3
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')

注意，堆栈打印是不同的，第一行和最后一行都不见了。因为它是不同的格式()。

在尽可能远离异常引发点的地方拦截异常，可以简化代码，同时提供更多信息。

其他一些答案已经指出了回溯模块。

请注意，使用print_exc，在某些极端情况下，您将无法获得您所期望的结果。在Python 2.x中:

import traceback

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception, err:
    try:
        raise TypeError("Again !?!")
    except:
        pass

    traceback.print_exc()

.．.将显示上一个异常的回溯:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "e.py", line 7, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Again !?!")
TypeError: Again !?!

如果你真的需要访问原始的回溯，一个解决方案是将exc_info返回的异常信息缓存到一个局部变量中，并使用print_exception显示它:

import traceback
import sys

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception, err:
    try:
        exc_info = sys.exc_info()

        # do you usefull stuff here
        # (potentially raising an exception)
        try:
            raise TypeError("Again !?!")
        except:
            pass
        # end of useful stuff


    finally:
        # Display the *original* exception
        traceback.print_exception(*exc_info)
        del exc_info

生产:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "t.py", line 6, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
TypeError: Oups!

但这也有一些陷阱:

From the doc of sys_info: Assigning the traceback return value to a local variable in a function that is handling an exception will cause a circular reference. This will prevent anything referenced by a local variable in the same function or by the traceback from being garbage collected. [...] If you do need the traceback, make sure to delete it after use (best done with a try ... finally statement) but, from the same doc: Beginning with Python 2.2, such cycles are automatically reclaimed when garbage collection is enabled and they become unreachable, but it remains more efficient to avoid creating cycles.

另一方面，通过允许你访问与异常相关的回溯，Python 3产生了一个不那么令人惊讶的结果:

import traceback

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception as err:
    try:
        raise TypeError("Again !?!")
    except:
        pass

    traceback.print_tb(err.__traceback__)

．.． 将显示:

  File "e3.py", line 4, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Oups!")

traceback.format_exception (exception_object)

如果你只有异常对象，你可以从Python 3中的任何代码点获得字符串形式的回溯:

import traceback

''.join(traceback.format_exception(None, exc_obj, exc_obj.__traceback__))

完整的例子:

#!/usr/bin/env python3

import traceback

def f():
    g()

def g():
    raise Exception('asdf')

try:
    g()
except Exception as e:
    exc_obj = e

tb_str = ''.join(traceback.format_exception(None, exc_obj, exc_obj.__traceback__))
print(tb_str)

输出:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./main.py", line 12, in <module>
    g()
  File "./main.py", line 9, in g
    raise Exception('asdf')
Exception: asdf

文档:https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/traceback.html traceback.format_exception

请参见:从异常对象中提取回溯信息

在Python 3.9中测试

您需要将try/except放在可能发生错误的最内层循环中，即。

for i in something:
    for j in somethingelse:
        for k in whatever:
            try:
                something_complex(i, j, k)
            except Exception, e:
                print e
        try:
            something_less_complex(i, j)
        except Exception, e:
            print e

．.． 等等

换句话说，您需要将可能在try/中失败的语句包装在尽可能具体的内部循环中。