不知道这是否与XAML相关，但在我简单的Windows应用程序中，我手动创建了绑定，并添加了一个格式事件处理程序。

public FormMain() {
  InitializeComponent();

  Binding argBinding = new Binding("Enabled", uxCheckBoxArgsNull, "Checked", false, DataSourceUpdateMode.OnPropertyChanged);
  argBinding.Format += new ConvertEventHandler(Binding_Format_BooleanInverse);
  uxTextBoxArgs.DataBindings.Add(argBinding);
}

void Binding_Format_BooleanInverse(object sender, ConvertEventArgs e) {
  bool boolValue = (bool)e.Value;
  e.Value = !boolValue;
}

I did something very similar. I created my property behind the scenes that enabled the selection of a combobox ONLY if it had finished searching for data. When my window first appears, it launches an async loaded command but I do not want the user to click on the combobox while it is still loading data (would be empty, then would be populated). So by default the property is false so I return the inverse in the getter. Then when I'm searching I set the property to true and back to false when complete.

private bool _isSearching;
public bool IsSearching
{
    get { return !_isSearching; }
    set
    {
        if(_isSearching != value)
        {
            _isSearching = value;
            OnPropertyChanged("IsSearching");
        }
    }
}

public CityViewModel()
{
    LoadedCommand = new DelegateCommandAsync(LoadCity, LoadCanExecute);
}

private async Task LoadCity(object pArg)
{
    IsSearching = true;

    //**Do your searching task here**

    IsSearching = false;
}

private bool LoadCanExecute(object pArg)
{
    return IsSearching;
}

然后，对于组合框，我可以直接绑定到IsSearching:

<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding Cities}" IsEnabled="{Binding IsSearching}" DisplayMemberPath="City" />

我希望我的XAML尽可能保持优雅，所以我创建了一个类来包装驻留在我的一个共享库中的bool类型，隐式操作符允许类在代码中无缝地用作bool类型

public class InvertableBool
{
    private bool value = false;

    public bool Value { get { return value; } }
    public bool Invert { get { return !value; } }

    public InvertableBool(bool b)
    {
        value = b;
    }

    public static implicit operator InvertableBool(bool b)
    {
        return new InvertableBool(b);
    }

    public static implicit operator bool(InvertableBool b)
    {
        return b.value;
    }

}

你的项目需要做的唯一改变就是让你想要反转的属性返回this而不是bool

    public InvertableBool IsActive 
    { 
        get 
        { 
            return true; 
        } 
    }

在XAML中，用Value或Invert后缀绑定

IsEnabled="{Binding IsActive.Value}"

IsEnabled="{Binding IsActive.Invert}"

不知道这是否与XAML相关，但在我简单的Windows应用程序中，我手动创建了绑定，并添加了一个格式事件处理程序。

public FormMain() {
  InitializeComponent();

  Binding argBinding = new Binding("Enabled", uxCheckBoxArgsNull, "Checked", false, DataSourceUpdateMode.OnPropertyChanged);
  argBinding.Format += new ConvertEventHandler(Binding_Format_BooleanInverse);
  uxTextBoxArgs.DataBindings.Add(argBinding);
}

void Binding_Format_BooleanInverse(object sender, ConvertEventArgs e) {
  bool boolValue = (bool)e.Value;
  e.Value = !boolValue;
}

在视图模型中再添加一个属性，它将返回反向值。 然后把它绑定到按钮上。 像;

视图模型:

public bool IsNotReadOnly{get{return !IsReadOnly;}}

在xaml:

IsEnabled="{Binding IsNotReadOnly"}

对于标准绑定，您需要使用看起来有点风的转换器。所以，我建议你看看我的CalcBinding项目，它是专门解决这个问题和其他一些问题而开发的。使用高级绑定，您可以直接在xaml中编写带有许多源属性的表达式。比如，你可以这样写:

<Button IsEnabled="{c:Binding Path=!IsReadOnly}" />

or

<Button Content="{c:Binding ElementName=grid, Path=ActualWidth+Height}"/>

or

<Label Content="{c:Binding A+B+C }" />

or

<Button Visibility="{c:Binding IsChecked, FalseToVisibility=Hidden}" />

其中A, B, C, IsChecked - viewModel的属性，它将正常工作