我也摆弄了一下这个问题，发现这里的大多数解决方案都非常缓慢。最快的方法实际上是dodgy_coder发布的LINQ + Aggregate方法。

但我想，这也可能是相当沉重的内存分配取决于有多少旧字符。所以我得出了这个结论:

这里的想法是为当前线程缓存旧字符的替换映射，以实现安全分配。除此之外，只是处理输入的字符数组之后会再次以字符串的形式返回。而字符数组则被尽可能少地修改。

[ThreadStatic]
private static bool[] replaceMap;
public static string Replace(this string input, char[] oldChars, char newChar)
{
    if (input == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(input));
    if (oldChars == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(oldChars));
    if (oldChars.Length == 1) return input.Replace(oldChars[0], newChar);
    if (oldChars.Length == 0) return input;

    replaceMap = replaceMap ?? new bool[char.MaxValue + 1];
    foreach (var oldChar in oldChars)
    {
        replaceMap[oldChar] = true;
    }

    try
    {
        var count = input.Length;
        var output = input.ToCharArray();
        for (var i = 0; i < count; i++)
        {
            if (replaceMap[input[i]])
            {
                output[i] = newChar;
            }
        }

        return new string(output);
    }
    finally
    {
        foreach (var oldChar in oldChars)
        {
            replaceMap[oldChar] = false;
        }
    }
}

对我来说，对于实际的输入字符串，这最多是两个分配。由于某些原因，StringBuilder对我来说要慢得多。它比LINQ变体快2倍。

你也可以简单地写这些字符串扩展方法，并把它们放在你的解决方案中的某个地方:

using System.Text;

public static class StringExtensions
{
    public static string ReplaceAll(this string original, string toBeReplaced, string newValue)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(original) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(toBeReplaced)) return original;
        if (newValue == null) newValue = string.Empty;
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        foreach (char ch in original)
        {
            if (toBeReplaced.IndexOf(ch) < 0) sb.Append(ch);
            else sb.Append(newValue);
        }
        return sb.ToString();
    }

    public static string ReplaceAll(this string original, string[] toBeReplaced, string newValue)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(original) || toBeReplaced == null || toBeReplaced.Length <= 0) return original;
        if (newValue == null) newValue = string.Empty;
        foreach (string str in toBeReplaced)
            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(str))
                original = original.Replace(str, newValue);
        return original;
    }
}

这样称呼他们:

"ABCDE".ReplaceAll("ACE", "xy");

xyBxyDxy

这:

"ABCDEF".ReplaceAll(new string[] { "AB", "DE", "EF" }, "xy");

xyCxyF

可以使用replace正则表达式。

s/[;,\t\r ]|[\n]{2}/\n/g

S /在开头表示搜索 [和]之间的字符是要搜索的字符(以任何顺序) 第二个/分隔搜索文本和替换文本

用英语来说，这是:

“寻找;或者，或者\t \r或者(空格)或者恰好两个连续的\n，然后把它替换成\n

在c#中，你可以做以下事情:(在导入system . text . regulareexpressions之后)

Regex pattern = new Regex("[;,\t\r ]|[\n]{2}");
pattern.Replace(myString, "\n");

使用正则表达式。替换，像这样:

  string input = "This is   text with   far  too   much   " + 
                 "whitespace.";
  string pattern = "[;,]";
  string replacement = "\n";
  Regex rgx = new Regex(pattern);
  string result = rgx.Replace(input, replacement);

这里是关于RegEx的MSDN文档的更多信息。取代

在构建了自己的解决方案并查看这里使用的解决方案后，我利用了一个不使用复杂代码且通常对大多数参数有效的答案。

Cover base cases where other methods are more appropriate. If there are no chars to replacement, return the original string. If there is only one, just use the Replace method. Use a StringBuilder and initialize the capacity to the length of the original string. After all, the new string being built will have the same length of the original string if its just chars being replaced. This ensure only 1 memory allocation is used for the new string. Assuming that the 'char' length could be small or large will impact performance. Large collections are better with hashsets, while smaller collections are not. This is a near-perfect use case for Hybrid Dictionaries. They switch to using a Hash based lookup once the collection gets too large. However, we don't care about the value of the dictionary, so I just set it to "true". Have different methods for StringBuilder verse just a string will prevent unnecessary memory allocation. If its just a string, don't instantiate a StringBuilder unless the base cases were checked. If its already a StringBuilder, then perform the replacements and return the StringBuilder itself (as other StringBuilder methods like Append do). I put the replacement char first, and the chars to check at the end. This way, I can leverage the params keyword for easily passing additional strings. However, you don't have to do this if you prefer the other order.

namespace Test.Extensions
{
    public static class StringExtensions
    {
        public static string ReplaceAll(this string str, char replacementCharacter, params char[] chars)
        {
            if (chars.Length == 0)
                return str;

            if (chars.Length == 1)
                return str.Replace(chars[0], replacementCharacter);

            StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str.Length);

            var searcher = new HybridDictionary(chars.Length);
            for (int i = 0; i < chars.Length; i++)
                searcher[chars[i]] = true;

            foreach (var c in str)
            {
                if (searcher.Contains(c))
                    sb.Append(replacementCharacter);
                else
                    sb.Append(c);
            }

            return sb.ToString();
        }

        public static StringBuilder ReplaceAll(this StringBuilder sb, char replacementCharacter, params char[] chars)
        {
            if (chars.Length == 0)
                return sb;

            if (chars.Length == 1)
                return sb.Replace(chars[0], replacementCharacter);

            var searcher = new HybridDictionary(chars.Length);
            for (int i = 0; i < chars.Length; i++)
                searcher[chars[i]] = true;

            for (int i = 0; i < sb.Length; i++)
            {
                var val = sb[i];
                if (searcher.Contains(val))
                    sb[i] = replacementCharacter;
            }

            return sb;
        }
    }
}

没有“替换”(仅限Linq):

    string myString = ";,\r\t \n\n=1;;2,,3\r\r4\t\t5  6\n\n\n\n7=";
    char NoRepeat = '\n';
    string ByeBye = ";,\r\t ";
    string myResult = myString.ToCharArray().Where(t => !"STOP-OUTSIDER".Contains(t))
                 .Select(t => "" + ( ByeBye.Contains(t) ? '\n' : t))
                  .Aggregate((all, next) => (
                      next == "" + NoRepeat && all.Substring(all.Length - 1) == "" + NoRepeat
                      ? all : all  + next ) );