如何使用JUnit来测试某些代码是否抛出异常?

我当然可以这样做:

@Test
public void testFooThrowsIndexOutOfBoundsException() {
  boolean thrown = false;

  try {
    foo.doStuff();
  } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) {
    thrown = true;
  }

  assertTrue(thrown);
}

我记得,对于这类情况,有一个注释或Assert.xyz之类的东西远没有JUnit那么笨拙,更符合JUnit的精神。


当前回答

在我的例子中,我总是从数据库中得到RuntimeException,但消息不同。需要分别处理异常。以下是我测试它的方法:

@Test
public void testThrowsExceptionWhenWrongSku() {

    // Given
    String articleSimpleSku = "999-999";
    int amountOfTransactions = 1;
    Exception exception = null;

    // When
    try {
        createNInboundTransactionsForSku(amountOfTransactions, articleSimpleSku);
    } catch (RuntimeException e) {
        exception = e;
    }

    // Then
    shouldValidateThrowsExceptionWithMessage(exception, MESSAGE_NON_EXISTENT_SKU);
}

private void shouldValidateThrowsExceptionWithMessage(final Exception e, final String message) {
    assertNotNull(e);
    assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains(message));
}

其他回答

小心使用预期的异常,因为它只断言方法抛出了该异常,而不是测试中的特定代码行。

我倾向于将其用于测试参数验证,因为这样的方法通常非常简单,但更复杂的测试可能更好:

try {
    methodThatShouldThrow();
    fail( "My method didn't throw when I expected it to" );
} catch (MyException expectedException) {
}

应用判断。

try {
    my method();
    fail( "This method must thrwo" );
} catch (Exception ex) {
    assertThat(ex.getMessage()).isEqual(myErrormsg);
}

我在这里尝试了许多方法,但它们要么很复杂,要么不太符合我的要求。事实上,可以非常简单地编写一个助手方法:

public class ExceptionAssertions {
    public static void assertException(BlastContainer blastContainer ) {
        boolean caughtException = false;
        try {
            blastContainer.test();
        } catch( Exception e ) {
            caughtException = true;
        }
        if( !caughtException ) {
            throw new AssertionFailedError("exception expected to be thrown, but was not");
        }
    }
    public static interface BlastContainer {
        public void test() throws Exception;
    }
}

这样使用:

assertException(new BlastContainer() {
    @Override
    public void test() throws Exception {
        doSomethingThatShouldExceptHere();
    }
});

零依赖:无需mockito,无需powermock;在期末考试中表现很好。

Java 8解决方案

如果您想要一个解决方案:

利用Java 8 lambda不依赖任何JUnit魔法允许您检查单个测试方法中的多个异常检查测试方法中特定的一组行(而不是整个测试方法中的任何未知行)是否引发异常生成引发的实际异常对象,以便您可以进一步检查它

下面是我编写的实用函数:

public final <T extends Throwable> T expectException( Class<T> exceptionClass, Runnable runnable )
{
    try
    {
        runnable.run();
    }
    catch( Throwable throwable )
    {
        if( throwable instanceof AssertionError && throwable.getCause() != null )
            throwable = throwable.getCause(); //allows testing for "assert x != null : new IllegalArgumentException();"
        assert exceptionClass.isInstance( throwable ) : throwable; //exception of the wrong kind was thrown.
        assert throwable.getClass() == exceptionClass : throwable; //exception thrown was a subclass, but not the exact class, expected.
        @SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" )
        T result = (T)throwable;
        return result;
    }
    assert false; //expected exception was not thrown.
    return null; //to keep the compiler happy.
}

(摘自我的博客)

使用方法如下:

@Test
public void testMyFunction()
{
    RuntimeException e = expectException( RuntimeException.class, () -> 
        {
            myFunction();
        } );
    assert e.getMessage().equals( "I haz fail!" );
}

public void myFunction()
{
    throw new RuntimeException( "I haz fail!" );
}

除了NamShubWriter所说的,还要确保:

ExpectedException实例是公共的(相关问题)ExpectedException未在@Before方法中实例化。这篇文章清楚地解释了JUnit执行顺序的所有复杂性。

不要这样做:

@Rule    
public ExpectedException expectedException;

@Before
public void setup()
{
    expectedException = ExpectedException.none();
}

最后,这篇博客文章清楚地说明了如何断言抛出了某个异常。