在Jest测试中,我一直得到“localStorage is not defined”,这是有意义的,但我的选项是什么?碰壁。


当前回答

至少到目前为止,localStorage可以很容易地在你的笑话测试中被监视,例如:

const spyRemoveItem = jest.spyOn(window.localStorage, 'removeItem')

就是这样。你可以像以前一样使用你的间谍。

其他回答

在这个网站的帮助下,我们找到了答案:https://groups.google.com/forum/#!主题/ jestjs / 9 ephunwvytg

设置一个包含以下内容的文件:

var localStorageMock = (function() {
  var store = {};
  return {
    getItem: function(key) {
      return store[key];
    },
    setItem: function(key, value) {
      store[key] = value.toString();
    },
    clear: function() {
      store = {};
    },
    removeItem: function(key) {
      delete store[key];
    }
  };
})();
Object.defineProperty(window, 'localStorage', { value: localStorageMock });

然后将以下行添加到包中。json在你的Jest配置

:“setupTestFrameworkScriptFile PATH_TO_YOUR_FILE”,

一个更好的替代方法,它处理未定义的值(它不需要toString()),如果值不存在则返回null。用react v15、redux和redux-auth-wrapper进行了测试

class LocalStorageMock {
  constructor() {
    this.store = {}
  }

  clear() {
    this.store = {}
  }

  getItem(key) {
    return this.store[key] || null
  }

  setItem(key, value) {
    this.store[key] = value
  }

  removeItem(key) {
    delete this.store[key]
  }
}

global.localStorage = new LocalStorageMock

一个使用TypeScript和Jest的更优雅的解决方案。

    interface Spies {
      [key: string]: jest.SpyInstance
    }
    
    describe('→ Local storage', () => {
    
      const spies: Spies = {}
    
      beforeEach(() => {
        ['setItem', 'getItem', 'clear'].forEach((fn: string) => {
          const mock = jest.fn(localStorage[fn])
          spies[fn] = jest.spyOn(Storage.prototype, fn).mockImplementation(mock)
        })
      })
    
      afterEach(() => {
        Object.keys(spies).forEach((key: string) => spies[key].mockRestore())
      })
    
      test('→ setItem ...', async () => {
          localStorage.setItem( 'foo', 'bar' )
          expect(localStorage.getItem('foo')).toEqual('bar')
          expect(spies.setItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
      })
    })

如果你正在寻找一个mock而不是存根,这是我使用的解决方案:

export const localStorageMock = {
   getItem: jest.fn().mockImplementation(key => localStorageItems[key]),
   setItem: jest.fn().mockImplementation((key, value) => {
       localStorageItems[key] = value;
   }),
   clear: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
       localStorageItems = {};
   }),
   removeItem: jest.fn().mockImplementation((key) => {
       localStorageItems[key] = undefined;
   }),
};

export let localStorageItems = {}; // eslint-disable-line import/no-mutable-exports

为了便于初始化,我导出了存储项。例如,我可以很容易地将它设置为一个对象

在Jest + JSDom的新版本中,不可能设置这个,但是本地存储已经可用,你可以像这样监视它:

const setItemSpy = jest.spyOn(Object.getPrototypeOf(window.localStorage), 'setItem');

以下解决方案兼容更严格的TypeScript、ESLint、TSLint和Prettier配置测试:{"proseWrap": "always", "semi": false, "singleQuote": true, "trailingComma": "es5"}:

class LocalStorageMock {
  public store: {
    [key: string]: string
  }
  constructor() {
    this.store = {}
  }

  public clear() {
    this.store = {}
  }

  public getItem(key: string) {
    return this.store[key] || undefined
  }

  public setItem(key: string, value: string) {
    this.store[key] = value.toString()
  }

  public removeItem(key: string) {
    delete this.store[key]
  }
}
/* tslint:disable-next-line:no-any */
;(global as any).localStorage = new LocalStorageMock()

HT/ https://stackoverflow.com/a/51583401/101290了解如何更新global.localStorage