PJL是对的。 我采纳了他的建议，我是这样做的:

为fragment定义的全局变量: attachingActivityLock = new Object(); private boolean syncVariable = false; 实现

@Override onAttach(Activity Activity) { super.onAttach(活动); synchronized (attachingActivityLock) { syncVariable = true; attachingActivityLock.notifyAll (); ｝ ｝

3.我在线程中包装了我的函数，在那里我需要调用getActivity()，因为如果它将在主线程上运行，我将用步骤4阻塞线程。onAttach()将永远不会被调用。

    Thread processImage = new Thread(new Runnable() {

        @Override
        public void run() {
            processImage();
        }
    });
    processImage.start();

4所示。在我的函数中，我需要调用getActivity()，我使用这个(在调用getActivity()之前)

    synchronized (attachingActivityLock) {
        while(!syncVariable){
            try {
                attachingActivityLock.wait();
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                // TODO Auto-generated catch block
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    }

如果你有一些UI更新，记得在UI线程上运行它们。我需要更新ImgeView，所以我做了:

image.post(new Runnable() {

    @Override
    public void run() {
        image.setImageBitmap(imageToShow);
    }
});

那些仍然有问题的onAttach(活动活动)，它只是改变了上下文-

    @Override
public void onAttach(Context context) {
    super.onAttach(context);
    this.context = context;
}

在大多数情况下，保存上下文对您来说就足够了——例如，如果您想执行getResources()，您可以直接从上下文执行。如果你仍然需要将上下文放入你的活动中，那么就这样做吧

 @Override
public void onAttach(Context context) {
    super.onAttach(context);
    mActivity a; //Your activity class - will probably be a global var.
    if (context instanceof mActivity){
        a=(mActivity) context;
    }
}

由user1868713建议。

在哪里调用这个函数?如果在Fragment的构造函数中调用它，它将返回null。

当onCreateView()方法被执行时，只需调用getActivity()。

另一个好的解决方案是使用Android的LiveData和MVVM架构。 你可以在你的ViewModel中定义一个LiveData对象，并在你的片段中观察它，当LiveData值发生变化时，只有当你的片段处于活动状态时，它才会通知你的观察者(在这种情况下是片段)，所以这将保证你的UI工作，只有当你的片段处于活动状态时才会访问活动。这是LiveData的一个优势

当然，当这个问题第一次被提出时，还没有LiveData。我把这个答案留在这里，因为在我看来，这个问题仍然存在，它可能会对某些人有所帮助。

The other answers that suggest keeping a reference to the activity in onAttach are just suggesting a bandaid to the real problem. When getActivity returns null it means that the Fragment is not attached to the Activity. Most commonly this happens when the Activity has gone away due to rotation or the Activity being finished but the Fragment still has some kind of callback listener registered preventing it from being garbage collected. When the listener gets called if you need to do something with the Activity but the Activity is gone there isn't much you can do. In your code you should just check getActivity() != null and if it's not there then don't do anything. If you keep a reference to the Activity that is gone you are preventing the Activity from being garbage collected. Any UI things you might try to do won't be seen by the user. I can imagine some situations where in the callback listener you want to have a Context for something non-UI related, in those cases it probably makes more sense to get the Application context. Note that the only reason that the onAttach trick isn't a big memory leak is because normally after the callback listener executes it won't be needed anymore and can be garbage collected along with the Fragment, all its View's and the Activity context. If you setRetainInstance(true) there is a bigger chance of a memory leak because the Activity field will also be retained but after rotation that could be the previous Activity not the current one.

Commit调度事务，也就是说，它不会立即发生，而是在下一次主线程准备就绪时在主线程上进行调度。

我建议加一个

onAttach(Activity activity)

方法，并在它上面放一个断点，看看它什么时候相对于你对asd()的调用被调用。您将看到它在您调用asd()退出的方法之后被调用。onAttach调用是片段附加到其活动的地方，从这一点上getActivity()将返回非空(注意还有一个onDetach()调用)。