考虑到这段代码,我能绝对确定finally块总是执行的吗,不管something()是什么?
try {
something();
return success;
}
catch (Exception e) {
return failure;
}
finally {
System.out.println("I don't know if this will get printed out");
}
考虑到这段代码,我能绝对确定finally块总是执行的吗,不管something()是什么?
try {
something();
return success;
}
catch (Exception e) {
return failure;
}
finally {
System.out.println("I don't know if this will get printed out");
}
当前回答
是的,它将始终调用,但在一种情况下,当您使用System.exit()时,它不会调用
try{
//risky code
}catch(Exception e){
//exception handling code
}
finally(){
//It always execute but before this block if there is any statement like System.exit(0); then this block not execute.
}
其他回答
是的,它将始终调用,但在一种情况下,当您使用System.exit()时,它不会调用
try{
//risky code
}catch(Exception e){
//exception handling code
}
finally(){
//It always execute but before this block if there is any statement like System.exit(0); then this block not execute.
}
这在任何语言中都是事实。。。finally将始终在return语句之前执行,无论该返回在方法体中的何处。如果不是这样的话,finally块就没有什么意义了。
公认的答案在几乎所有方面都是正确的,但它仍然只是事实的一半(好吧,95%的事实)。
假设以下代码:
private final Lock m_Lock = new ReentrantLock();
…
public final SomeObject doSomething( final SomeObject arg )
{
final SomeObject retValue;
try
{
lock.lock();
retValue = SomeObject( arg );
}
finally
{
out.println( "Entering finally block");
callingAnotherMethod( arg, retValue );
lock.unlock();
}
return retValue;
}
…
try
{
final var result = doSomething( new SomeObject() );
}
catch( final StackOverflowError e ) { /* Deliberately ignored */ }
调用doSomething()方法将几乎立即导致StackOverflowError。
锁也不会松开!
但是,当finally块总是被执行时(接受的答案中已经列出了例外情况),这怎么会发生呢?
这是因为不能保证finally块中的所有语句都真正执行!
如果在调用lock.unlock()之前调用System.exit()或throws语句,这将是显而易见的。
但示例代码中没有类似的内容…
除此之外,调用lock.unlock()之前finally块中的另外两个方法调用将导致另一个StackOverflowError…
瞧,锁没有松开!
虽然这样的示例代码很愚蠢,但在许多类型的软件中都可以找到类似的模式。只要最后一个街区没有发生什么丑恶的事情,一切都会好起来的…
有趣的事实是,它在Java的更高版本中不起作用(这意味着在更高的版本中,锁被释放了…)。不知道何时以及为什么会发生变化。
但您仍然必须确保finally块始终正常终止,否则它是否始终被执行可能无关紧要…
是的,因为没有控制语句可以阻止finally被执行。
下面是一个参考示例,其中将执行所有代码块:
| x | Current result | Code
|---|----------------|------ - - -
| | |
| | | public static int finallyTest() {
| 3 | | int x = 3;
| | | try {
| | | try {
| 4 | | x++;
| 4 | return 4 | return x;
| | | } finally {
| 3 | | x--;
| 3 | throw | throw new RuntimeException("Ahh!");
| | | }
| | | } catch (RuntimeException e) {
| 4 | return 4 | return ++x;
| | | } finally {
| 3 | | x--;
| | | }
| | | }
| | |
|---|----------------|------ - - -
| | Result: 4 |
在下面的变体中,返回x;将跳过。结果仍然是4:
public static int finallyTest() {
int x = 3;
try {
try {
x++;
if (true) throw new RuntimeException("Ahh!");
return x; // skipped
} finally {
x--;
}
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
return ++x;
} finally {
x--;
}
}
当然,引用可以跟踪其状态。此示例返回值为4的引用:
static class IntRef { public int value; }
public static IntRef finallyTest() {
IntRef x = new IntRef();
x.value = 3;
try {
return x;
} finally {
x.value++; // will be tracked even after return
}
}
我试过了,它是单线程的。
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
Object obj = new Object();
try {
synchronized (obj) {
obj.wait();
System.out.println("after wait()");
}
} catch (Exception ignored) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
主线程将永远处于等待状态,因此最终不会被调用,
因此控制台输出不会在wait()或finally之后打印String:
同意@Stephen C的观点,上述示例是这里提到的第三个案例之一:
在以下代码中添加更多这样的无限循环可能性:
// import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
// Thread.sleep(Long.MAX_VALUE);
// Thread.currentThread().join();
// new Semaphore(0).acquire();
// while (true){}
System.out.println("after sleep join semaphore exit infinite while loop");
} catch (Exception ignored) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
案例2:如果JVM首先崩溃
import sun.misc.Unsafe;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
unsafeMethod();
//Runtime.getRuntime().halt(123);
System.out.println("After Jvm Crash!");
} catch (Exception e) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
private static void unsafeMethod() throws NoSuchFieldException, IllegalAccessException {
Field f = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredField("theUnsafe");
f.setAccessible(true);
Unsafe unsafe = (Unsafe) f.get(null);
unsafe.putAddress(0, 0);
}
参考:如何使JVM崩溃?
情况6:如果finally块将由守护程序线程执行,并且所有其他非守护程序线程在finally被调用之前退出。
public static void main(String args[]) {
Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
printThreads("Daemon Thread printing");
// just to ensure this thread will live longer than main thread
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (Exception e) {
} finally {
System.out.println("finally");
}
}
};
Thread daemonThread = new Thread(runnable);
daemonThread.setDaemon(Boolean.TRUE);
daemonThread.setName("My Daemon Thread");
daemonThread.start();
printThreads("main Thread Printing");
}
private static synchronized void printThreads(String str) {
System.out.println(str);
int threadCount = 0;
Set<Thread> threadSet = Thread.getAllStackTraces().keySet();
for (Thread t : threadSet) {
if (t.getThreadGroup() == Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup()) {
System.out.println("Thread :" + t + ":" + "state:" + t.getState());
++threadCount;
}
}
System.out.println("Thread count started by Main thread:" + threadCount);
System.out.println("-------------------------------------------------");
}
输出:这不会打印“finally”,这意味着“守护进程线程”中的“finally块”没有执行
主螺纹打印线程:线程[My Daemon线程,5,main]:状态:BLOCKED线程:线程[main,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE线程:线程[Monitor Ctrl-Break,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE主线程启动的线程计数:3------------------------------------------------- Daemon线程打印线程:线程[My Daemon线程,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE线程:线程[Monitor Ctrl-Break,5,main]:状态:RUNNABLE主线程启动的线程计数:2------------------------------------------------- 进程已完成,退出代码为0