根据我的理解，async和await所做的主要事情之一是使代码易于编写和阅读-但使用它们是否等于生成后台线程来执行长时间的逻辑?
我目前正在尝试最基本的例子。我内联添加了一些注释。你能给我解释一下吗?
// I don't understand why this method must be marked as `async`.
private async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Task<int> access = DoSomethingAsync();
// task independent stuff here
// this line is reached after the 5 seconds sleep from
// DoSomethingAsync() method. Shouldn't it be reached immediately?
int a = 1;
// from my understanding the waiting should be done here.
int x = await access;
}
async Task<int> DoSomethingAsync()
{
// is this executed on a background thread?
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000);
return 1;
}
下面是通过打开对话框读取excel文件的代码，然后使用async和等待运行异步代码，从excel逐行读取并绑定到网格
namespace EmailBillingRates
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
lblProcessing.Text = "";
}
private async void btnReadExcel_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string filename = OpenFileDialog();
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application xlApp = new Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application();
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Workbook xlWorkbook = xlApp.Workbooks.Open(filename);
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel._Worksheet xlWorksheet = xlWorkbook.Sheets[1];
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Range xlRange = xlWorksheet.UsedRange;
try
{
Task<int> longRunningTask = BindGrid(xlRange);
int result = await longRunningTask;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message.ToString());
}
finally
{
//cleanup
// GC.Collect();
//GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
//rule of thumb for releasing com objects:
// never use two dots, all COM objects must be referenced and released individually
// ex: [somthing].[something].[something] is bad
//release com objects to fully kill excel process from running in the background
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlRange);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlWorksheet);
//close and release
xlWorkbook.Close();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlWorkbook);
//quit and release
xlApp.Quit();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(xlApp);
}
}
private void btnSendEmail_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private string OpenFileDialog()
{
string filename = "";
OpenFileDialog fdlg = new OpenFileDialog();
fdlg.Title = "Excel File Dialog";
fdlg.InitialDirectory = @"c:\";
fdlg.Filter = "All files (*.*)|*.*|All files (*.*)|*.*";
fdlg.FilterIndex = 2;
fdlg.RestoreDirectory = true;
if (fdlg.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK)
{
filename = fdlg.FileName;
}
return filename;
}
private async Task<int> BindGrid(Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Range xlRange)
{
lblProcessing.Text = "Processing File.. Please wait";
int rowCount = xlRange.Rows.Count;
int colCount = xlRange.Columns.Count;
// dt.Column = colCount;
dataGridView1.ColumnCount = colCount;
dataGridView1.RowCount = rowCount;
for (int i = 1; i <= rowCount; i++)
{
for (int j = 1; j <= colCount; j++)
{
//write the value to the Grid
if (xlRange.Cells[i, j] != null && xlRange.Cells[i, j].Value2 != null)
{
await Task.Delay(1);
dataGridView1.Rows[i - 1].Cells[j - 1].Value = xlRange.Cells[i, j].Value2.ToString();
}
}
}
lblProcessing.Text = "";
return 0;
}
}
internal class async
{
}
}
除了其他答案，还有await (c#参考)
更具体地说，在包含的例子中，它解释了您的情况
下面的Windows窗体示例说明了await在
异步方法，WaitAsynchronouslyAsync。对比一下它的行为
方法使用waitsynchrontically的行为。没有等待
应用到任务的操作符，waitsynchronize同步运行
尽管在定义中使用了async修饰符，并且调用了
线程。睡在它的身体里。
private async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Call the method that runs asynchronously.
string result = await WaitAsynchronouslyAsync();
// Call the method that runs synchronously.
//string result = await WaitSynchronously ();
// Display the result.
textBox1.Text += result;
}
// The following method runs asynchronously. The UI thread is not
// blocked during the delay. You can move or resize the Form1 window
// while Task.Delay is running.
public async Task<string> WaitAsynchronouslyAsync()
{
await Task.Delay(10000);
return "Finished";
}
// The following method runs synchronously, despite the use of async.
// You cannot move or resize the Form1 window while Thread.Sleep
// is running because the UI thread is blocked.
public async Task<string> WaitSynchronously()
{
// Add a using directive for System.Threading.
Thread.Sleep(10000);
return "Finished";
}
在一个简单的控制台程序中显示上述解释:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
TestAsyncAwaitMethods();
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit...");
Console.ReadLine();
}
public async static void TestAsyncAwaitMethods()
{
await LongRunningMethod();
}
public static async Task<int> LongRunningMethod()
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting Long Running method...");
await Task.Delay(5000);
Console.WriteLine("End Long Running method...");
return 1;
}
}
输出为:
Starting Long Running method...
Press any key to exit...
End Long Running method...
因此,
Main通过TestAsyncAwaitMethods启动长时间运行的方法。这立即返回，而不停止当前线程，我们立即看到'按任何键退出'消息
在此期间，LongRunningMethod一直在后台运行。一旦它完成，来自Threadpool的另一个线程拾取该上下文并显示最终消息
因此，没有线程被阻塞。
说实话，我仍然认为最好的解释是维基百科上关于未来和承诺的解释:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futures_and_promises
基本思想是，您拥有一个单独的异步执行任务的线程池。使用时。然而，对象承诺它将在某个时间执行操作，并在您请求时给您结果。这意味着当您请求结果并且还没有完成时，它将阻塞，否则将在线程池中执行。
从那里你可以优化事情:一些操作可以异步实现，你可以优化像文件IO和网络通信通过批处理后续请求和/或重新排序它们。我不确定这是否已经在微软的任务框架中-但如果不是，这将是我首先要添加的事情之一。
实际上，您可以在c# 4.0中实现这种未来模式。如果你想知道它到底是如何工作的，我可以推荐这个链接:http://code.google.com/p/fracture/source/browse/trunk/Squared/TaskLib/。但是，如果您自己开始使用它，您将注意到如果您想做所有很酷的事情，您确实需要语言支持——这正是微软所做的。
