import java.util.Scanner;
public class Big {

    public static void main(String[] args) {


        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
        System.out.print("Enter the number ");
        String str = sc.next();
        int t=0;

        char[] chars  = str.toCharArray();



        for(int i=str.length()-1,j=str.length()-2;j>=0;j--)
        {


                if((int)chars[i]>(int)chars[j])
                {
                    t = (int)chars[i];
                    chars[i] = chars[j];
                    chars[j]=(char)t;

                    for(int k=j+1;k<str.length()-1;k++)
                    {
                        for(int l=k+1;l<str.length();l++)
                        {
                            if(chars[k]>chars[l])
                            {
                                int m = (int)chars[k];
                                chars[k] = chars[l];
                                chars[l]=(char)m;
                            }
                        }
                    }

                    break;
                }






        }
        System.out.print("The next Big number is: ");

        for(int i=0;i<str.length();i++){
            System.out.print(chars[i]);
        }
        sc.close();
    }


}

至少，这里有几个基于字符串的暴力解决方案的例子，你应该能够马上想到:

38276中的数字排序为23678

38627排序的数字列表是23678

蛮力增量，排序和比较

沿着蛮力解决方案将转换为字符串 然后用这些数字强行找出所有可能的数字。

从它们中创建int，把它们放在一个列表中并排序， 获取目标条目之后的下一个条目。

如果你花了30分钟在这个问题上，却没有想出一个蛮力的方法，我也不会雇用你。

在商业世界中，一个不优雅、缓慢和笨拙但能完成工作的解决方案总是比没有解决方案更有价值，事实上，这几乎描述了所有不优雅、缓慢和笨拙的商业软件。

下面是Python中的一个紧凑(但部分是蛮力)解决方案

def findnext(ii): return min(v for v in (int("".join(x)) for x in
    itertools.permutations(str(ii))) if v>ii)

在c++中，你可以这样排列:https://stackoverflow.com/a/9243091/1149664(它与itertools中的算法相同)

以下是Weeble和BlueRaja描述的顶部答案的实现(其他答案)。我怀疑还有什么更好的办法。

def findnext(ii):
    iis=list(map(int,str(ii)))
    for i in reversed(range(len(iis))):
        if i == 0: return ii
        if iis[i] > iis[i-1] :
            break        
    left,right=iis[:i],iis[i:]
    for k in reversed(range(len(right))):
        if right[k]>left[-1]:
           right[k],left[-1]=left[-1],right[k]
           break
    return int("".join(map(str,(left+sorted(right)))))

我只测试了两个数字。他们工作。 在去年12月退休之前，我做了8年的IT经理，我关心三件事: 1)准确性:如果它总是有效，那就很好。 2)速度:用户可以接受。 3)明确:我可能没有你聪明，但我付你薪水。确保你用英语解释你在做什么。

奥马尔，祝你好运。

Sub Main()

Dim Base(0 To 9) As Long
Dim Test(0 To 9) As Long

Dim i As Long
Dim j As Long
Dim k As Long
Dim ctr As Long

Const x As Long = 776914648
Dim y As Long
Dim z As Long

Dim flag As Boolean

' Store the digit count for the original number in the Base vector.
    For i = 0 To 9
        ctr = 0
        For j = 1 To Len(CStr(x))
            If Mid$(CStr(x), j, 1) = i Then ctr = ctr + 1
        Next j
        Base(i) = ctr
    Next i

' Start comparing from the next highest number.
    y = x + 1
    Do

' Store the digit count for the each new number in the Test vector.
        flag = False
        For i = 0 To 9
            ctr = 0
            For j = 1 To Len(CStr(y))
                If Mid$(CStr(y), j, 1) = i Then ctr = ctr + 1
            Next j
            Test(i) = ctr
        Next i

' Compare the digit counts.
        For k = 0 To 9
            If Test(k) <> Base(k) Then flag = True
        Next k

' If no match, INC and repeat.
        If flag = True Then
            y = y + 1
            Erase Test()
        Else
            z = y ' Match.
        End If

    Loop Until z > 0

    MsgBox (z), , "Solution"

End Sub

I didn't know anything about the brute force algorithm when answering this question, so I approached it from another angle. I decided to search the entire range of possible solutions that this number could possibly be rearranged into, starting from the number_given+1 up to the max number available (999 for a 3 digit number, 9999 for 4 digits, etc.). I did this kind of like finding a palindrome with words, by sorting the numbers of each solution and comparing it to the sorted number given as the parameter. I then simply returned the first solution in the array of solutions, as this would be the next possible value.

下面是我的Ruby代码:

def PermutationStep(num)

    a = []
    (num.to_s.length).times { a.push("9") }
    max_num = a.join('').to_i
    verify = num.to_s.split('').sort
    matches = ((num+1)..max_num).select {|n| n.to_s.split('').sort == verify }

    if matches.length < 1
      return -1
    else
      matches[0]
    end
end

我很确定你的面试官是想委婉地让你说出这样的话:

local number = 564321;

function split(str)
    local t = {};
    for i = 1, string.len(str) do
        table.insert(t, str.sub(str,i,i));
    end
    return t;
end

local res = number;
local i = 1;
while number >= res do
    local t = split(tostring(res));
    if i == 1 then
        i = #t;
    end
    t[i], t[i-1] = t[i-1], t[i];
    i = i - 1;
    res = tonumber(table.concat(t));
end

print(res);

不一定是最有效或最优雅的解决方案，但它在两个循环中解决了所提供的示例，并像他建议的那样一次交换一个数字。