使用Array函数，

String.prototype.reverse = function(){
    return [].reduceRight.call(this, function(last, secLast){return last + secLast});
}

添加的反向字符串没有循环，它是通过递归工作。

函数反向(y) { 如果(y)。Length ==1 || . Length == 0){ 返回y; ｝ 返回y.split(”)[y。长度- 1]+反向(y。片(0,y.length-1)); ｝ console.log(反向(“Hello”));

var str = "IAMA JavaScript Developer";
var a=str.split(''), b = a.length;
for (var i=0; i<b; i++) {
    a.unshift(a.splice(1+i,1).shift())
}
a.shift();
alert(a.join(''));

使用扩展语法的清晰方式:

const reverseString = str => [...str].reverse（）.join（''）; console.log（reverseString（'ABC'））;

你不能将字符串反向，但你可以使用这个:

String.prototype.reverse = function() { 返回this.split (" ") .reverse () . join (" "); ｝ var s = "ABCD"; S = S .reverse(); console.log(年代);

真正的答案是:你不能把它颠倒过来，但是你可以创建一个颠倒过来的新字符串。

Just as an exercise to play with recursion: sometimes when you go to an interview, the interviewer may ask you how to do this using recursion, and I think the "preferred answer" might be "I would rather not do this in recursion as it can easily cause a stack overflow" (because it is O(n) rather than O(log n). If it is O(log n), it is quite difficult to get a stack overflow -- 4 billion items could be handled by a stack level of 32, as 2 ** 32 is 4294967296. But if it is O(n), then it can easily get a stack overflow.

有时候面试官还是会问你，“作为练习，你为什么不用递归来写呢?”就是这样:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    if (this.length <= 1) return this;
    else return this.slice(1).reverse() + this.slice(0,1);
}

测试运行:

var s = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    s += ("apple" + i);
}
console.log(s.reverse());

输出:

999elppa899elppa...2elppa1elppa0elppa

为了尝试获得堆栈溢出，我在谷歌Chrome中将1000更改为10000，它报告:

RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded