没有内置方法?鉴于Javascript中的字符串是不可变的，您可能希望使用内置的方法，如split、join等。但这里有两种不使用这些方法的方法:

function ReverseString(str) {
    var len = str.length;
    var newString = [];

    while (len--) {
        newString.push(str[len]);
    }

    return newString.join('');
}

console.log(ReverseString('amgod')) //dogma

function RecursiveStringReverse(str, len) {
    if (len === undefined)
        len = str.length - 1;

    if (len > 0)
        return str[len] + RecursiveReverse(str, --len);

    return str[len];
}

console.log(RecursiveStringReverse('Hello, world!'))// !dlrow ,olleH

我知道这是一个已经被很好地回答过的老问题，但为了自娱自乐，我写了下面的反向函数，并想把它分享给其他人，以防它对其他人有用。它处理代理对和组合标记:

function StringReverse (str)
{
  var charArray = [];
  for (var i = 0; i < str.length; i++)
    {
      if (i+1 < str.length)
        {
          var value = str.charCodeAt(i);
          var nextValue = str.charCodeAt(i+1);
          if (   (   value >= 0xD800 && value <= 0xDBFF
                  && (nextValue & 0xFC00) == 0xDC00) // Surrogate pair)
              || (nextValue >= 0x0300 && nextValue <= 0x036F)) // Combining marks
            {
              charArray.unshift(str.substring(i, i+2));
              i++; // Skip the other half
              continue;
            }
        }

      // Otherwise we just have a rogue surrogate marker or a plain old character.
      charArray.unshift(str[i]);
    }

  return charArray.join('');
}

感谢Mathias、Punycode和其他各种参考资料，让我了解了JavaScript字符编码的复杂性。

函数反向(字符串) ｛ Let arr = []; For (let char of string) { arr.unshift (char); ｝ Let rev = arr.join(") 返回牧师 ｝ Let result = reverse("hello") console.log(结果)

我们可以从字符串数组的两端开始迭代:start和end，并在每次迭代中交换。

function reverse(str) {
 let strArray = str.split("");
 let start = 0;
 let end = strArray.length - 1;

 while(start <= end) {
  let temp = strArray[start];
  strArray[start] = strArray[end];
  strArray[end] = temp;

  start++;
  end--;
 }
 return strArray.join("");
}

虽然操作次数减少了，但其时间复杂度仍为O(n) 操作的数量仍然与输入的大小成线性比例。

参考： 阿尔戈日报

只要你处理的是简单的ASCII字符，并且你很乐意使用内置函数，这就可以工作:

function reverse(s){
    return s.split("").reverse().join("");
}

如果您需要一个支持UTF-16或其他多字节字符的解决方案，请注意这个函数会给出无效的unicode字符串，或者看起来很滑稽的有效字符串。你可以考虑一下这个答案。

[…s]是Unicode感知的，一个小的编辑给出:-

function reverse(s){
    return [...s].reverse().join("");
}

看来我已经迟到3年了…

不幸的是，正如已经指出的那样，你不能。参见JavaScript字符串是不可变的吗?我需要一个“字符串生成器”在JavaScript?

你能做的下一个最好的事情是创建一个“视图”或“包装器”，它接受一个字符串并重新实现你正在使用的字符串API的任何部分，但假装字符串是反向的。例如:

var identity = function(x){return x};

function LazyString(s) {
    this.original = s;

    this.length = s.length;
    this.start = 0; this.stop = this.length; this.dir = 1; // "virtual" slicing
    // (dir=-1 if reversed)

    this._caseTransform = identity;
}

// syntactic sugar to create new object:
function S(s) {
    return new LazyString(s);
}

//We now implement a `"...".reversed` which toggles a flag which will change our math:

(function(){ // begin anonymous scope
    var x = LazyString.prototype;

    // Addition to the String API
    x.reversed = function() {
        var s = new LazyString(this.original);

        s.start = this.stop - this.dir;
        s.stop = this.start - this.dir;
        s.dir = -1*this.dir;
        s.length = this.length;

        s._caseTransform = this._caseTransform;
        return s;
    }

//We also override string coercion for some extra versatility (not really necessary):

    // OVERRIDE STRING COERCION
    //   - for string concatenation e.g. "abc"+reversed("abc")
    x.toString = function() {
        if (typeof this._realized == 'undefined') {  // cached, to avoid recalculation
            this._realized = this.dir==1 ?
                this.original.slice(this.start,this.stop) : 
                this.original.slice(this.stop+1,this.start+1).split("").reverse().join("");

            this._realized = this._caseTransform.call(this._realized, this._realized);
        }
        return this._realized;
    }

//Now we reimplement the String API by doing some math:

    // String API:

    // Do some math to figure out which character we really want

    x.charAt = function(i) {
        return this.slice(i, i+1).toString();
    }
    x.charCodeAt = function(i) {
        return this.slice(i, i+1).toString().charCodeAt(0);
    }

// Slicing functions:

    x.slice = function(start,stop) {
        // lazy chaining version of https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/slice

        if (stop===undefined)
            stop = this.length;

        var relativeStart = start<0 ? this.length+start : start;
        var relativeStop = stop<0 ? this.length+stop : stop;

        if (relativeStart >= this.length)
            relativeStart = this.length;
        if (relativeStart < 0)
            relativeStart = 0;

        if (relativeStop > this.length)
            relativeStop = this.length;
        if (relativeStop < 0)
            relativeStop = 0;

        if (relativeStop < relativeStart)
            relativeStop = relativeStart;

        var s = new LazyString(this.original);
        s.length = relativeStop - relativeStart;
        s.start = this.start + this.dir*relativeStart;
        s.stop = s.start + this.dir*s.length;
        s.dir = this.dir;

        //console.log([this.start,this.stop,this.dir,this.length], [s.start,s.stop,s.dir,s.length])

        s._caseTransform = this._caseTransform;
        return s;
    }
    x.substring = function() {
        // ...
    }
    x.substr = function() {
        // ...
    }

//Miscellaneous functions:

    // Iterative search

    x.indexOf = function(value) {
        for(var i=0; i<this.length; i++)
            if (value==this.charAt(i))
                return i;
        return -1;
    }
    x.lastIndexOf = function() {
        for(var i=this.length-1; i>=0; i--)
            if (value==this.charAt(i))
                return i;
        return -1;
    }

    // The following functions are too complicated to reimplement easily.
    // Instead just realize the slice and do it the usual non-in-place way.

    x.match = function() {
        var s = this.toString();
        return s.apply(s, arguments);
    }
    x.replace = function() {
        var s = this.toString();
        return s.apply(s, arguments);
    }
    x.search = function() {
        var s = this.toString();
        return s.apply(s, arguments);
    }
    x.split = function() {
        var s = this.toString();
        return s.apply(s, arguments);
    }

// Case transforms:

    x.toLowerCase = function() {
        var s = new LazyString(this.original);
        s._caseTransform = ''.toLowerCase;

        s.start=this.start; s.stop=this.stop; s.dir=this.dir; s.length=this.length;

        return s;
    }
    x.toUpperCase = function() {
        var s = new LazyString(this.original);
        s._caseTransform = ''.toUpperCase;

        s.start=this.start; s.stop=this.stop; s.dir=this.dir; s.length=this.length;

        return s;
    }

})() // end anonymous scope

演示:

> r = S('abcABC')
LazyString
  original: "abcABC"
  __proto__: LazyString

> r.charAt(1);       // doesn't reverse string!!! (good if very long)
"B"

> r.toLowerCase()    // must reverse string, so does so
"cbacba"

> r.toUpperCase()    // string already reversed: no extra work
"CBACBA"

> r + '-demo-' + r   // natural coercion, string already reversed: no extra work
"CBAcba-demo-CBAcba"

最重要的是——下面是用纯数学来完成的，每个角色只访问一次，而且是在必要的时候:

> 'demo: ' + S('0123456789abcdef').slice(3).reversed().slice(1,-1).toUpperCase()
"demo: EDCBA987654"

> S('0123456789ABCDEF').slice(3).reversed().slice(1,-1).toLowerCase().charAt(3)
"b"

如果应用于一个非常大的字符串，如果您只取其中相对较小的部分，则可以节省大量的时间。

Whether this is worth it (over reversing-as-a-copy like in most programming languages) highly depends on your use case and how efficiently you reimplement the string API. For example if all you want is to do string index manipulation, or take small slices or substrs, this will save you space and time. If you're planning on printing large reversed slices or substrings however, the savings may be small indeed, even worse than having done a full copy. Your "reversed" string will also not have the type string, though you might be able to fake this with prototyping.

The above demo implementation creates a new object of type ReversedString. It is prototyped, and therefore fairly efficient, with almost minimal work and minimal space overhead (prototype definitions are shared). It is a lazy implementation involving deferred slicing. Whenever you perform a function like .slice or .reversed, it will perform index mathematics. Finally when you extract data (by implicitly calling .toString() or .charCodeAt(...) or something), it will apply those in a "smart" manner, touching the least data possible.

注意:上面的字符串API是一个例子，可能不能完美地实现。你也可以只使用你需要的1-2个函数。