如果v1为空，就不能这样做，但可以用运算符检查。

v2 = v1 ?? 0;

可以使用Value属性进行赋值。

v2 = v1.Value;

在c# 7.1及以后版本中，类型可以通过使用默认字面值而不是默认操作符来推断，因此它可以写成如下:

v2 = v1 ?? default;

正常的TypeConversion将抛出异常

Eg:

int y = 5;    
int? x = null;    
y = x.value; //It will throw "Nullable object must have a value"   
Console.WriteLine(y);

使用Convert.ToInt32()方法

int y = 5;    
int? x = null;    
y = x.Convert.ToInt32(x);    
Console.WriteLine(y);

这将返回0作为输出，因为y是整数。

可以使用以下任何一种转换方法:

v2 = Convert.ToInt32(v1);

v2 = （int）v1;

v2 = v1.GetValueOrDefault();

V2 = v1。HasValue吗?v1:0;

根据你的使用上下文，你可以使用c# 7的模式匹配特性:

int? v1 = 100;
if (v1 is int v2)
{
    Console.WriteLine($"I'm not nullable anymore: {v2}");
}

编辑:

由于有些人没有留下解释就投了反对票，我想添加一些细节来解释将此作为可行解决方案的基本原理。

C# 7's pattern matching now allows us check the type of a value and cast it implicitly. In the above snippet, the if-condition will only pass when the value stored in v1 is type-compatible to the type for v2, which in this case is int. It follows that when the value for v1 is null, the if-condition will fail since null cannot be assigned to an int. More properly, null is not an int. I'd like to highlight that the that this solution may not always be the optimal choice. As I suggest, I believe this will depend on the developer's exact usage context. If you already have an int? and want to conditionally operate on its value if-and-only-if the assigned value is not null (this is the only time it is safe to convert a nullable int to a regular int without losing information), then pattern matching is perhaps one of the most concise ways to do this.