我有一个循环,开头为for I,范围为(0,100)。正常情况下,它可以正常运行,但有时由于网络条件而出现故障。目前,我已经设置它,以便在失败时,它将继续在except子句中(继续到I的下一个数字)。

我是否可以将相同的数字重新分配给i,并再次运行失败的循环迭代?


当前回答

for _ in range(5):
    try:
        # replace this with something that may fail
        raise ValueError("foo")

    # replace Exception with a more specific exception
    except Exception as e:
        err = e
        continue

    # no exception, continue remainder of code
    else:
        break

# did not break the for loop, therefore all attempts
# raised an exception
else:
    raise err

我的版本与上面的几个类似,但没有使用单独的while循环,如果所有重试都失败,则重新引发最新的异常。可以显式地在顶部设置err = None,但不是严格必要的,因为它只应该在出现错误时执行最后一个else块,因此设置了err。

其他回答

使用递归

for i in range(100):
    def do():
        try:
            ## Network related scripts
        except SpecificException as ex:
            do()
    do() ## invoke do() whenever required inside this loop

我喜欢使用bool值,如下所示:

success = False
num_try = 0
while success is False:
    if num_try >= 10: # or any number
        # handle error how  you please
    try:
        # code
        success = True
    except Exception as e:
        # record or do something with exception if needed
        num_try += 1

不使用那些丑陋的while循环的更“功能性”的方法:

def tryAgain(retries=0):
    if retries > 10: return
    try:
        # Do stuff
    except:
        retries+=1
        tryAgain(retries)

tryAgain()

更新2021-12-01:

自2016年6月起,不再维护重试包。 考虑使用活动的fork github.com/jd/tenacity,或者github.com/litl/backoff。


重试包是在失败时重试代码块的好方法。

例如:

@retry(wait_random_min=1000, wait_random_max=2000)
def wait_random_1_to_2_s():
    print("Randomly wait 1 to 2 seconds between retries")

使用while和计数器:

count = 1
while count <= 3:  # try 3 times
    try:
        # do_the_logic()
        break
    except SomeSpecificException as e:
        # If trying 3rd time and still error?? 
        # Just throw the error- we don't have anything to hide :)
        if count == 3:
            raise
        count += 1