如果我有对象的引用:

var test = {};

可能(但不是立即)具有嵌套对象,例如:

{level1: {level2: {level3: "level3"}}};

检查深度嵌套对象中是否存在属性的最佳方法是什么?

警报(测试级别1);生成未定义,但警告(test.level1.level2.level3);失败。

我目前正在做这样的事情:

if(test.level1 && test.level1.level2 && test.level1.level2.level3) {
    alert(test.level1.level2.level3);
}

但我想知道是否有更好的方法。


当前回答

对该答案进行轻微编辑,以允许在路径中嵌套数组

var has=函数(obj,key){return key.split(“.”).every(函数(x){if(类型obj!=“对象”| | obj===空| |!x在obj中)return false;if(obj.constructor==数组)obj=obj[0];obj=obj[x];返回true;});}

检查链接答案的用法:)

其他回答

一个简短的ES5版本@CMS的优秀答案:

// Check the obj has the keys in the order mentioned. Used for checking JSON results.  
var checkObjHasKeys = function(obj, keys) {
  var success = true;
  keys.forEach( function(key) {
    if ( ! obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
      success = false;
    }
    obj = obj[key];
  })
  return success;
}

通过类似测试:

var test = { level1:{level2:{level3:'result'}}};
utils.checkObjHasKeys(test, ['level1', 'level2', 'level3']); // true
utils.checkObjHasKeys(test, ['level1', 'level2', 'foo']); // false

基于这个答案,我使用ES2015提出了一个通用函数,可以解决这个问题

function validChain( object, ...keys ) {
    return keys.reduce( ( a, b ) => ( a || { } )[ b ], object ) !== undefined;
}

var test = {
  first: {
    second: {
        third: "This is not the key your are looking for"
    }
  }
}

if ( validChain( test, "first", "second", "third" ) ) {
    console.log( test.first.second.third );
}

今天刚刚编写了这个函数,它对嵌套对象中的属性进行了深入搜索,如果找到了,则返回该属性的值。

/**
 * Performs a deep search looking for the existence of a property in a 
 * nested object. Supports namespaced search: Passing a string with
 * a parent sub-object where the property key may exist speeds up
 * search, for instance: Say you have a nested object and you know for 
 * certain the property/literal you're looking for is within a certain
 * sub-object, you can speed the search up by passing "level2Obj.targetProp"
 * @param {object} obj Object to search
 * @param {object} key Key to search for
 * @return {*} Returns the value (if any) located at the key
 */
var getPropByKey = function( obj, key ) {
    var ret = false, ns = key.split("."),
        args = arguments,
        alen = args.length;

    // Search starting with provided namespace
    if ( ns.length > 1 ) {
        obj = (libName).getPropByKey( obj, ns[0] );
        key = ns[1];
    }

    // Look for a property in the object
    if ( key in obj ) {
        return obj[key];
    } else {
        for ( var o in obj ) {
            if ( (libName).isPlainObject( obj[o] ) ) {
                ret = (libName).getPropByKey( obj[o], key );
                if ( ret === 0 || ret === undefined || ret ) {
                    return ret;
                }
            }
        }
    }

    return false;
}

另一个选项(接近这个答案):

function resolve(root, path){
    try {
        return (new Function(
            'root', 'return root.' + path + ';'
        ))(root);
    } catch (e) {}
}

var tree = { level1: [{ key: 'value' }] };
resolve(tree, 'level1[0].key'); // "value"
resolve(tree, 'level1[1].key'); // undefined

更多信息:https://stackoverflow.com/a/18381564/1636522

还有一个非常紧凑的:

function ifSet(object, path) {
  return path.split('.').reduce((obj, part) => obj && obj[part], object)
}

打电话:

let a = {b:{c:{d:{e:'found!'}}}}
ifSet(a, 'b.c.d.e') == 'found!'
ifSet(a, 'a.a.a.a.a.a') == undefined

它的性能不会很好,因为它拆分了一个字符串(但增加了调用的可读性),并遍历所有内容,即使已经很明显找不到任何内容(但提高了函数本身的可读性。

至少比get快http://jsben.ch/aAtmc