git diff --name-only master...branch-name

我们要与之进行比较。

扩展@twalberg和@iconoclast，如果你因为任何原因使用cmd，你可以使用:

FOR /F "usebackq" %x IN (`"git branch | grep '*' | cut -f2 -d' '"`) DO FOR /F "usebackq" %y IN (`"git merge-base %x master"`) DO git diff --name-only %x %y

下面的批处理文件是基于twalberg的回答，但可以在Windows中工作:

@ECHO OFF
C:                               :: <== OR USE A DIFFERENT DRIVE
CD \path\to\where\git\files\are  :: <== CHANGE TO THE ACTUAL PATH
SET /p b="Enter full path of an ALREADY MERGED branch to compare with origin/master: "
bash --login -i -c "git diff --name-only %b% $(git merge-base %b1% origin/drop2/master)"
PAUSE

上面假设主分支是origin/master，并且在安装git时包含了git bash(它的位置在path环境中)。我实际上需要使用配置的diff工具(kdiff3)来显示实际的差异，因此替换了上面的以下bash命令:

bash --login -i -c "git difftool --dir-diff %b% $(git merge-base %b1% origin/drop2/master)"

git diff --name-only master...branch-name

我们要与之进行比较。

2020年11月更新:

要获得当前分支中修改(并提交!)的文件列表，您可以使用使用标准git的最短控制台命令:

Git diff -name-only master…

If your local "master" branch is outdated (behind the remote), add a remote name (assuming it is "origin"): git diff --name-only origin/master... If you want to include uncommitted changes as well, remove the ...: git diff --name-only master If you use different main branch name (eg: "main"), substitute it: git diff --name-only main... If your want to output to stdout (so its copyable): git diff --name-only master... | cat If your want filenames to be clickable in VSCode terminal no matter what folder you are running this command from, add --relative: git diff --name-only --relative master... | cat

每个非常好的详细解释不同的选项https://blog.jpalardy.com/posts/git-how-to-find-modified-files-on-a-branch/

如果真能这么简单呢?

git changed

如果您愿意假设主分支被称为“master”，并且您从master创建其他分支，那么您可以将这个别名添加到~/。Gitconfig文件使它变得简单:

cbranch = !"git branch | grep '*' | cut -f2 -d' '"
changed = !"git diff --name-only $(git cbranch) $(git merge-base $(git cbranch) master)"

这些假设在大多数情况下适用于大多数人，但你必须意识到你在做这些假设。

此外，您必须使用支持$()的shell。您的shell很可能支持这一点。