迟到总比不到好。您的原始代码使用了enumerate()，但您只使用i索引来检查它是否是列表中的最后一项。下面是一个使用负索引的更简单的替代方法(如果你不需要enumerate()):

for data in data_list:
    code_that_is_done_for_every_element
    if data != data_list[-1]:
        code_that_is_done_between_elements

if data != data_list[-1]检查迭代中的当前项是否不是列表中的最后一项。

希望这能有所帮助，即使是在近11年后。

假设input是一个迭代器，下面是使用itertools中的tee和izip的方法:

from itertools import tee, izip
items, between = tee(input_iterator, 2)  # Input must be an iterator.
first = items.next()
do_to_every_item(first)  # All "do to every" operations done to first item go here.
for i, b in izip(items, between):
    do_between_items(b)  # All "between" operations go here.
    do_to_every_item(i)  # All "do to every" operations go here.

演示:

>>> def do_every(x): print "E", x
...
>>> def do_between(x): print "B", x
...
>>> test_input = iter(range(5))
>>>
>>> from itertools import tee, izip
>>>
>>> items, between = tee(test_input, 2)
>>> first = items.next()
>>> do_every(first)
E 0
>>> for i,b in izip(items, between):
...     do_between(b)
...     do_every(i)
...
B 0
E 1
B 1
E 2
B 2
E 3
B 3
E 4
>>>

迟到总比不到好。您的原始代码使用了enumerate()，但您只使用i索引来检查它是否是列表中的最后一项。下面是一个使用负索引的更简单的替代方法(如果你不需要enumerate()):

for data in data_list:
    code_that_is_done_for_every_element
    if data != data_list[-1]:
        code_that_is_done_between_elements

if data != data_list[-1]检查迭代中的当前项是否不是列表中的最后一项。

希望这能有所帮助，即使是在近11年后。

这是一个老问题，已经有很多很好的回答了，但我觉得这很python:

def rev_enumerate(lst):
    """
    Similar to enumerate(), but counts DOWN to the last element being the
    zeroth, rather than counting UP from the first element being the zeroth.

    Since the length has to be determined up-front, this is not suitable for
    open-ended iterators.

    Parameters
    ----------
    lst : Iterable
        An iterable with a length (list, tuple, dict, set).

    Yields
    ------
    tuple
        A tuple with the reverse cardinal number of the element, followed by
        the element of the iterable.
    """
    length = len(lst) - 1
    for i, element in enumerate(lst):
        yield length - i, element

这样用:

for num_remaining, item in rev_enumerate(['a', 'b', 'c']):
    if not num_remaining:
        print(f'This is the last item in the list: {item}')

或者你想做相反的事情:

for num_remaining, item in rev_enumerate(['a', 'b', 'c']):
    if num_remaining:
        print(f'This is NOT the last item in the list: {item}')

或者，只是想知道当你走的时候还剩下多少……

for num_remaining, item in rev_enumerate(['a', 'b', 'c']):
    print(f'After {item}, there are {num_remaining} items.')

我认为现有枚举的通用性和熟悉性使其最具python性。

注意，与enumerate()不同，rev_enumerate()要求输入实现__len__，但这包括列表、元组、字典和集。

我想到的最简单的解决办法是:

for item in data_list:
    try:
        print(new)
    except NameError: pass
    new = item
print('The last item: ' + str(new))

所以我们总是通过延迟处理一个迭代来提前一个项目。为了在第一次迭代中跳过某些操作，我只需捕获错误。

当然，您需要考虑一下，以便在需要时引发NameError。

还要保留“counstruct”

try:
    new
except NameError: pass
else:
    # continue here if no error was raised

这依赖于之前没有定义名称new。如果你是偏执狂，你可以确保new不存在，使用:

try:
    del new
except NameError:
    pass

当然，你也可以使用if语句(if notfirst: print(new) else: notfirst = True)。但据我所知，开销更大。

Using `timeit` yields:

    ...: try: new = 'test' 
    ...: except NameError: pass
    ...: 
100000000 loops, best of 3: 16.2 ns per loop

所以我认为开销是不可能当选的。

这类似于Ants Aasma的方法，但没有使用itertools模块。它也是一个滞后迭代器，它可以提前查找迭代器流中的单个元素:

def last_iter(it):
    # Ensure it's an iterator and get the first field
    it = iter(it)
    prev = next(it)
    for item in it:
        # Lag by one item so I know I'm not at the end
        yield 0, prev
        prev = item
    # Last item
    yield 1, prev

def test(data):
    result = list(last_iter(data))
    if not result:
        return
    if len(result) > 1:
        assert set(x[0] for x in result[:-1]) == set([0]), result
    assert result[-1][0] == 1

test([])
test([1])
test([1, 2])
test(range(5))
test(xrange(4))

for is_last, item in last_iter("Hi!"):
    print is_last, item