最简单的方法是用哈弗辛包装。

import haversine as hs

coord_1 = (lat, lon)
coord_2 = (lat, lon)
x = hs.haversine(coord_1, coord_2)
print(f'The distance is {x} km')

最简单的方法是用哈弗辛包装。

import haversine as hs

coord_1 = (lat, lon)
coord_2 = (lat, lon)
x = hs.haversine(coord_1, coord_2)
print(f'The distance is {x} km')

注意，如果你只是需要一种快速简单的方法来找到两点之间的距离，我强烈建议使用Kurt回答中描述的方法，而不是重新实现haversine，查看他的帖子来了解基本原理。

这个答案只关注OP遇到的特定bug。

这是因为在Python中，所有的三角函数都使用弧度，而不是度。

您可以手动将数字转换为弧度，或使用数学模块中的radians函数:

from math import sin, cos, sqrt, atan2, radians

# Approximate radius of earth in km
R = 6373.0

lat1 = radians(52.2296756)
lon1 = radians(21.0122287)
lat2 = radians(52.406374)
lon2 = radians(16.9251681)

dlon = lon2 - lon1
dlat = lat2 - lat1

a = sin(dlat / 2)**2 + cos(lat1) * cos(lat2) * sin(dlon / 2)**2
c = 2 * atan2(sqrt(a), sqrt(1 - a))

distance = R * c

print("Result: ", distance)
print("Should be: ", 278.546, "km")

距离现在返回正确的值278.545589351 km。

对于像我这样通过搜索引擎来到这里的人，以及正在寻找开箱即用的解决方案的人，我建议安装mpu。通过pip Install mpu——user安装它，然后像这样使用它来获得haversine距离:

import mpu

# Point one
lat1 = 52.2296756
lon1 = 21.0122287

# Point two
lat2 = 52.406374
lon2 = 16.9251681

# What you were looking for
dist = mpu.haversine_distance((lat1, lon1), (lat2, lon2))
print(dist)  # gives 278.45817507541943.

另一个包是gpxpy。

如果你不想要依赖，你可以使用:

import math

def distance(origin, destination):
    """
    Calculate the Haversine distance.

    Parameters
    ----------
    origin : tuple of float
        (lat, long)
    destination : tuple of float
        (lat, long)

    Returns
    -------
    distance_in_km : float

    Examples
    --------
    >>> origin = (48.1372, 11.5756)  # Munich
    >>> destination = (52.5186, 13.4083)  # Berlin
    >>> round(distance(origin, destination), 1)
    504.2
    """
    lat1, lon1 = origin
    lat2, lon2 = destination
    radius = 6371  # km

    dlat = math.radians(lat2 - lat1)
    dlon = math.radians(lon2 - lon1)
    a = (math.sin(dlat / 2) * math.sin(dlat / 2) +
         math.cos(math.radians(lat1)) * math.cos(math.radians(lat2)) *
         math.sin(dlon / 2) * math.sin(dlon / 2))
    c = 2 * math.atan2(math.sqrt(a), math.sqrt(1 - a))
    d = radius * c

    return d


if __name__ == '__main__':
    import doctest
    doctest.testmod()

另一种替代方案是haversine:

from haversine import haversine, Unit

lyon = (45.7597, 4.8422) # (latitude, longitude)
paris = (48.8567, 2.3508)

haversine(lyon, paris)
>> 392.2172595594006  # In kilometers

haversine(lyon, paris, unit=Unit.MILES)
>> 243.71201856934454  # In miles

# You can also use the string abbreviation for units:
haversine(lyon, paris, unit='mi')
>> 243.71201856934454  # In miles

haversine(lyon, paris, unit=Unit.NAUTICAL_MILES)
>> 211.78037755311516  # In nautical miles

他们声称对两个向量中所有点之间的距离进行了性能优化:

from haversine import haversine_vector, Unit

lyon = (45.7597, 4.8422) # (latitude, longitude)
paris = (48.8567, 2.3508)
new_york = (40.7033962, -74.2351462)

haversine_vector([lyon, lyon], [paris, new_york], Unit.KILOMETERS)

>> array([ 392.21725956, 6163.43638211])

(2022年，JavaScript版本)下面是使用最新的JavaScript库解决这个问题的代码。总的好处是，用户可以在运行在现代设备上的web页面上看到结果。

// Using the WGS84 ellipsoid model for computation var geod84 = geodesic.Geodesic.WGS84; // Input data lat1 = 52.2296756; lon1 = 21.0122287; lat2 = 52.406374; lon2 = 16.9251681; // Do the classic `geodetic inversion` computation geod84inv = geod84.Inverse(lat1, lon1, lat2, lon2); // Present the solution (only the geodetic distance) console.log("The distance is " + (geod84inv.s12/1000).toFixed(5) + " km."); <script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/geographiclib-geodesic@2.0.0/geographiclib-geodesic.min.js"> </script>

Vincenty距离从GeoPy 1.13版开始就被弃用了-你应该使用geo .distance.distance()来代替!

上面的答案是基于haversine公式，该公式假设地球是一个球体，结果误差高达0.5%(根据help(earth .distance))。Vincenty距离采用更精确的椭球模型，如WGS-84，并在地质学中实现。例如,

import geopy.distance

coords_1 = (52.2296756, 21.0122287)
coords_2 = (52.406374, 16.9251681)

print geopy.distance.geodesic(coords_1, coords_2).km

将使用默认的椭球WGS-84打印279.352901604公里的距离。(你也可以选择。miles或其他距离单位。)