这是否意味着两个线程不能同时更改底层数据?或者它是否意味着当多个线程执行给定的代码段时,该代码段将以可预测的结果运行?
当前回答
用最简单的话来说:P 如果在一个代码块上执行多个线程是安全的,那么它就是线程安全的*
*适用条件
条件被其他的答案提到,比如 1. 如果你执行一个线程或多个线程,结果应该是相同的。
其他回答
与其认为代码或类是线程安全的,我认为将操作视为线程安全的更有帮助。如果两个操作在从任意线程上下文运行时按照指定的方式运行,那么它们就是线程安全的。在许多情况下,类将以线程安全的方式支持一些操作组合,而其他则不支持。
例如,许多像数组列表和散列集这样的集合可以保证,如果它们最初只由一个线程访问,并且在引用对任何其他线程可见后永远不会被修改,那么它们可以被任何线程组合以任意方式读取而不受干扰。
More interestingly, some hash-set collections such as the original non-generic one in .NET, may offer a guarantee that as long as no item is ever removed, and provided that only one thread ever writes to them, any thread that tries to read the collection will behave as though accessing a collection where updates might be delayed and occur in arbitrary order, but which will otherwise behave normally. If thread #1 adds X and then Y, and thread #2 looks for and sees Y and then X, it would be possible for thread #2 to see that Y exists but X doesn't; whether or not such behavior is "thread-safe" would depend upon whether thread #2 is prepared to deal with that possibility.
As a final note, some classes--especially blocking communications libraries--may have a "close" or "Dispose" method which is thread-safe with respect to all other methods, but no other methods that are thread-safe with respect to each other. If a thread performs a blocking read request and a user of the program clicks "cancel", there would be no way for a close request to be issued by the thread that's attempting to perform the read. The close/dispose request, however, may asynchronously set a flag which will cause the read request to be canceled as soon as possible. Once close is performed on any thread, the object would become useless, and all attempts at future actions would fail immediately, but being able to asynchronously terminate any attempted I/O operations is better than require that the close request be synchronized with the read (since if the read blocks forever, the synchronization request would be likewise blocked).
一个信息量更大的问题是,是什么使代码不线程安全——答案是,有四个条件必须成立……想象一下下面的代码(它是机器语言翻译)
totalRequests = totalRequests + 1
MOV EAX, [totalRequests] // load memory for tot Requests into register
INC EAX // update register
MOV [totalRequests], EAX // store updated value back to memory
The first condition is that there are memory locations that are accessible from more than one thread. Typically, these locations are global/static variables or are heap memory reachable from global/static variables. Each thread gets its own stack frame for function/method scoped local variables, so these local function/method variables, otoh, (which are on the stack) are accessible only from the one thread that owns that stack. The second condition is that there is a property (often called an invariant), which is associated with these shared memory locations, that must be true, or valid, for the program to function correctly. In the above example, the property is that “totalRequests must accurately represent the total number of times any thread has executed any part of the increment statement”. Typically, this invariant property needs to hold true (in this case, totalRequests must hold an accurate count) before an update occurs for the update to be correct. The third condition is that the invariant property does NOT hold during some part of the actual update. (It is transiently invalid or false during some portion of the processing). In this particular case, from the time totalRequests is fetched until the time the updated value is stored, totalRequests does not satisfy the invariant. The fourth and final condition that must occur for a race to happen (and for the code to therefore NOT be "thread-safe") is that another thread must be able to access the shared memory while the invariant is broken, thereby causing inconsistent or incorrect behavior.
正如其他人所指出的,线程安全意味着如果一段代码同时被多个线程使用,那么它将正常工作。
值得注意的是,这有时是有代价的,计算机时间和更复杂的编码,所以它并不总是可取的。如果一个类只能安全地在一个线程上使用,那么这样做可能会更好。
例如,Java有两个几乎相同的类:StringBuffer和StringBuilder。不同之处在于StringBuffer是线程安全的,因此StringBuffer的单个实例可以同时被多个线程使用。StringBuilder不是线程安全的,它被设计为仅由一个线程构建String的情况下(绝大多数情况下)的高性能替代品。
线程安全代码是指即使有多个线程同时执行也能正常工作的代码。
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/threadsafe.html
是也不是。
线程安全不仅仅是确保共享数据一次只能被一个线程访问。您必须确保对共享数据的顺序访问,同时避免竞争条件、死锁、活动锁和资源短缺。
当多个线程同时运行时,不可预知的结果并不是线程安全代码的必要条件,但这通常是一种副产品。例如,您可以使用一个共享队列、一个生产者线程和几个消费者线程来设置生产者-消费者方案,并且数据流可能完全可预测。如果你开始引入更多的消费者,你会看到更多随机的结果。
推荐文章
- 在支持循环和函数的语言中,是否存在“goto”的合法用例?
- 跨线程操作无效:控件“textBox1”从创建它的线程以外的线程访问
- 为什么不使用异常作为常规的控制流呢?
- 线和纤维的区别是什么?
- 什么是序列化?
- Java同步方法锁定对象,或方法?
- Haskell对Node.js的响应是什么?
- 每个递归都可以转换成迭代吗?
- 调用线程必须是STA,因为许多UI组件都要求这一点
- Redis是单线程的,那么它如何做并发I/O?
- 什么是ORM,它是如何工作的,我应该如何使用它?
- 我能在服务器端应用程序(PHP、Ruby、Python等)上读取URL的哈希部分吗?
- 多少个参数是太多?
- 对于没有null的语言的最佳解释
- Java:如何测试调用System.exit()的方法?