这是否意味着两个线程不能同时更改底层数据?或者它是否意味着当多个线程执行给定的代码段时,该代码段将以可预测的结果运行?
当前回答
是的,是的。它意味着数据不会被多个线程同时修改。然而,您的程序可能会像预期的那样工作,并且看起来是线程安全的,即使它根本不是。
请注意,结果的不可预测性是“竞态条件”的结果,它可能导致数据以与预期顺序不同的顺序被修改。
其他回答
完成其他回答:
只有当方法中的代码做以下两件事之一时,同步才会令人担忧:
使用一些非线程安全的外部资源。 读取或更改持久对象或类字段
这意味着在方法中定义的变量总是线程安全的。对方法的每次调用都有自己版本的这些变量。如果方法是由另一个线程调用的,或者是由同一线程调用的,甚至是方法调用自身(递归),这些变量的值是不共享的。
线程调度不保证是循环的。一个任务可能会以牺牲相同优先级的线程为代价完全占用CPU。你可以使用Thread.yield()来获得良心。你可以使用(java) thread . setpriority (thread . norm_priority -1)来降低线程的优先级
另外还要注意:
迭代这些“线程安全”结构的应用程序的巨大运行时成本(已经被其他人提到)。 Thread.sleep(5000)应该休眠5秒。但是,如果有人更改了系统时间,您可能会睡很长时间或根本没有时间。操作系统记录唤醒时间是绝对的,而不是相对的。
一个信息量更大的问题是,是什么使代码不线程安全——答案是,有四个条件必须成立……想象一下下面的代码(它是机器语言翻译)
totalRequests = totalRequests + 1
MOV EAX, [totalRequests] // load memory for tot Requests into register
INC EAX // update register
MOV [totalRequests], EAX // store updated value back to memory
The first condition is that there are memory locations that are accessible from more than one thread. Typically, these locations are global/static variables or are heap memory reachable from global/static variables. Each thread gets its own stack frame for function/method scoped local variables, so these local function/method variables, otoh, (which are on the stack) are accessible only from the one thread that owns that stack. The second condition is that there is a property (often called an invariant), which is associated with these shared memory locations, that must be true, or valid, for the program to function correctly. In the above example, the property is that “totalRequests must accurately represent the total number of times any thread has executed any part of the increment statement”. Typically, this invariant property needs to hold true (in this case, totalRequests must hold an accurate count) before an update occurs for the update to be correct. The third condition is that the invariant property does NOT hold during some part of the actual update. (It is transiently invalid or false during some portion of the processing). In this particular case, from the time totalRequests is fetched until the time the updated value is stored, totalRequests does not satisfy the invariant. The fourth and final condition that must occur for a race to happen (and for the code to therefore NOT be "thread-safe") is that another thread must be able to access the shared memory while the invariant is broken, thereby causing inconsistent or incorrect behavior.
线程安全代码是指即使有多个线程同时执行也能正常工作的代码。
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/threadsafe.html
是的,是的。它意味着数据不会被多个线程同时修改。然而,您的程序可能会像预期的那样工作,并且看起来是线程安全的,即使它根本不是。
请注意,结果的不可预测性是“竞态条件”的结果,它可能导致数据以与预期顺序不同的顺序被修改。
线程安全代码按照指定的方式工作,即使由不同的线程同时输入。这通常意味着,应该不间断地运行的内部数据结构或操作受到保护,不会同时进行不同的修改。