Java finalize()方法不是析构函数，不应用于处理应用程序所依赖的逻辑。Java规范声明，不能保证在应用程序的生存期内调用finalize方法。

你可能想要的是一个finally和cleanup方法的组合，如:

MyClass myObj;

try {
    myObj = new MyClass();

    // ...
} finally {
    if (null != myObj) {
        myObj.cleanup();
    }
}

这将正确处理MyClass()构造函数抛出异常时的情况。

正如在https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/java/MET12-J.+Do+not+use+finalizers上指出的那样，

There is no fixed time at which finalizers must be executed because time of execution depends on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). The only guarantee is that any finalizer method that executes will do so sometime after the associated object has become unreachable (detected during the first cycle of garbage collection) and sometime before the garbage collector reclaims the associated object's storage (during the garbage collector's second cycle). Execution of an object's finalizer may be delayed for an arbitrarily long time after the object becomes unreachable. Consequently, invoking time-critical functionality such as closing file handles in an object's finalize() method is problematic.

Finalize将打印出类创建的计数。

protected void finalize() throws Throwable {
    System.out.println("Run F" );
    if ( checkedOut)
        System.out.println("Error: Checked out");
        System.out.println("Class Create Count: " + classCreate);
}

main

while ( true) {
    Book novel=new Book(true);
    //System.out.println(novel.checkedOut);
    //Runtime.getRuntime().runFinalization();
    novel.checkIn();
    new Book(true);
    //System.runFinalization();
    System.gc();

如你所见。下面的输出显示了类计数为36时第一次执行的gc。

C:\javaCode\firstClass>java TerminationCondition
Run F
Error: Checked out
Class Create Count: 36
Run F
Error: Checked out
Class Create Count: 48
Run F

一般来说，最好不要依赖finalize()来做任何清理等。

根据Javadoc(值得一读)，它是:

当垃圾回收确定对象不再有引用时，由垃圾回收器在对象上调用。

正如Joachim指出的，如果对象总是可访问的，那么在程序的生命周期中，这可能永远不会发生。

此外，垃圾收集器不保证在任何特定时间运行。一般来说，我想说的是finalize()可能不是最好的方法，除非有特定的事情需要它。

在最近与终结器方法搏斗之后(为了在测试期间处理连接池)，我不得不说终结器缺少很多东西。使用VisualVM来观察以及使用弱引用来跟踪实际的交互，我发现以下事情在Java 8环境中是正确的(Oracle JDK, Ubuntu 15):

Finalize is not called immediately the Finalizer (GC part) individually owns the reference elusively The default Garbage Collector pools unreachable objects Finalize is called in bulk pointing to an implementation detail that there is a certain phase the garbage collector frees the resources. Calling System.gc() often does not result in objects being finalized more often, it just results in the Finalizer getting aware of an unreachable object more rapidly Creating a thread dump almost always result in triggering the finalizer due to high heap overhead during performing the heap dump or some other internal mechanism Finalization seams to be bound by either memory requirements (free up more memory) or by the list of objects being marked for finalization growing of a certain internal limit. So if you have a lot of objects getting finalized the finalization phase will be triggered more often and earlier when compared with only a few There were circumstances a System.gc() triggered a finalize directly but only if the reference was a local and short living. This might be generation related.

最后认为

最后确定方法是不可靠的，但只能用于一件事。您可以确保在垃圾收集之前关闭或释放对象，从而在正确处理涉及生命结束操作的更复杂生命周期的对象时实现故障安全。这是我能想到的一个值得我们去推翻它的原因。

试着运行这个程序，以便更好地理解

public class FinalizeTest 
{       
    static {
        System.out.println(Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory());
    }

    public void run() {
        System.out.println("run");
        System.out.println(Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory());
    }

     protected void finalize() throws Throwable { 
         System.out.println("finalize");
         while(true)
             break;          
     }

     public static void main(String[] args) {
            for (int i = 0 ; i < 500000 ; i++ ) {
                    new FinalizeTest().run();
            }
     }
}