我有一个任意的。net程序集列表。
我需要以编程方式检查每个DLL是否为x86构建(而不是x64或任何CPU)。这可能吗?
我有一个任意的。net程序集列表。
我需要以编程方式检查每个DLL是否为x86构建(而不是x64或任何CPU)。这可能吗?
当前回答
下面是一个批处理文件,它将针对当前工作目录和所有子目录中的所有DLL文件和EXE文件运行corflags.exe,解析结果并显示每个目标体系结构。
Depending on the version of corflags.exe that is used, the line items in the output will either include 32BIT, or 32BITREQ (and 32BITPREF). Whichever of these two is included in the output is the critical line item that must be checked to differentiate between Any CPU and x86. If you are using an older version of corflags.exe (pre Windows SDK v8.0A), then only the 32BIT line item will be present in the output, as others have indicated in past answers. Otherwise 32BITREQ and 32BITPREF replace it.
这假设corflags.exe在%PATH%. exe文件中。确保这一点的最简单方法是使用开发人员命令提示符。或者,您也可以从默认位置复制它。
如果下面的批处理文件是针对一个非托管DLL或EXE文件运行的,它将错误地显示为x86,因为Corflags.exe的实际输出将是一个类似于:
CF008:指定的文件没有有效的托管头
@echo off
echo.
echo Target architecture for all exes and dlls:
echo.
REM For each exe and dll in this directory and all subdirectories...
for %%a in (.exe, .dll) do forfiles /s /m *%%a /c "cmd /c echo @relpath" > testfiles.txt
for /f %%b in (testfiles.txt) do (
REM Dump corflags results to a text file
corflags /nologo %%b > corflagsdeets.txt
REM Parse the corflags results to look for key markers
findstr /C:"PE32+">nul .\corflagsdeets.txt && (
REM `PE32+` indicates x64
echo %%~b = x64
) || (
REM pre-v8 Windows SDK listed only "32BIT" line item,
REM newer versions list "32BITREQ" and "32BITPREF" line items
findstr /C:"32BITREQ : 0">nul /C:"32BIT : 0" .\corflagsdeets.txt && (
REM `PE32` and NOT 32bit required indicates Any CPU
echo %%~b = Any CPU
) || (
REM `PE32` and 32bit required indicates x86
echo %%~b = x86
)
)
del corflagsdeets.txt
)
del testfiles.txt
echo.
其他回答
一个工具是sigcheck:
sigcheck c:\Windows\winhlp32.exe
输出:
Sigcheck v2.71 - File version and signature viewer
Copyright (C) 2004-2018 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com
c:\windows\winhlp32.exe:
Verified: Signed
Signing date: 20:05 02.05.2022
Publisher: Microsoft Windows
Company: Microsoft Corporation
Description: Windows Winhlp32 Stub
Product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
Prod version: 10.0.19041.1
File version: 10.0.19041.1 (WinBuild.160101.0800)
MachineType: 32-bit
sigcheck -nobanner c:\Windows\HelpPane.exe
输出:
c:\windows\HelpPane.exe:
Verified: Signed
Signing date: 00:42 23.04.2022
Publisher: Microsoft Windows
Company: Microsoft Corporation
Description: Microsoft Help and Support
Product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System
Prod version: 10.0.19041.1151
File version: 10.0.19041.1151 (WinBuild.160101.0800)
MachineType: 64-bit
下面是一个批处理文件,它将针对当前工作目录和所有子目录中的所有DLL文件和EXE文件运行corflags.exe,解析结果并显示每个目标体系结构。
Depending on the version of corflags.exe that is used, the line items in the output will either include 32BIT, or 32BITREQ (and 32BITPREF). Whichever of these two is included in the output is the critical line item that must be checked to differentiate between Any CPU and x86. If you are using an older version of corflags.exe (pre Windows SDK v8.0A), then only the 32BIT line item will be present in the output, as others have indicated in past answers. Otherwise 32BITREQ and 32BITPREF replace it.
这假设corflags.exe在%PATH%. exe文件中。确保这一点的最简单方法是使用开发人员命令提示符。或者,您也可以从默认位置复制它。
如果下面的批处理文件是针对一个非托管DLL或EXE文件运行的,它将错误地显示为x86,因为Corflags.exe的实际输出将是一个类似于:
CF008:指定的文件没有有效的托管头
@echo off
echo.
echo Target architecture for all exes and dlls:
echo.
REM For each exe and dll in this directory and all subdirectories...
for %%a in (.exe, .dll) do forfiles /s /m *%%a /c "cmd /c echo @relpath" > testfiles.txt
for /f %%b in (testfiles.txt) do (
REM Dump corflags results to a text file
corflags /nologo %%b > corflagsdeets.txt
REM Parse the corflags results to look for key markers
findstr /C:"PE32+">nul .\corflagsdeets.txt && (
REM `PE32+` indicates x64
echo %%~b = x64
) || (
REM pre-v8 Windows SDK listed only "32BIT" line item,
REM newer versions list "32BITREQ" and "32BITPREF" line items
findstr /C:"32BITREQ : 0">nul /C:"32BIT : 0" .\corflagsdeets.txt && (
REM `PE32` and NOT 32bit required indicates Any CPU
echo %%~b = Any CPU
) || (
REM `PE32` and 32bit required indicates x86
echo %%~b = x86
)
)
del corflagsdeets.txt
)
del testfiles.txt
echo.
试着在CodePlex中使用这个项目中的CorFlagsReader。它没有对其他程序集的引用,可以按原样使用。
澄清一下,CorFlags.exe是. net Framework SDK的一部分。我的机器上有开发工具,对我来说,确定DLL是否仅为32位的最简单方法是:
打开Visual Studio命令提示符(Windows系统:菜单开始/程序/Microsoft Visual Studio/Visual Studio工具/Visual Studio 2008命令提示符) CD到包含有关DLL的目录 像这样运行corflags: corflags MyAssembly.dll
你会得到这样的输出:
Microsoft (R) .NET Framework CorFlags Conversion Tool. Version 3.5.21022.8
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Version : v2.0.50727
CLR Header: 2.5
PE : PE32
CorFlags : 3
ILONLY : 1
32BIT : 1
Signed : 0
根据评论,上述标志的解读如下:
任意CPU: PE = PE32, 32BIT = 0 x86: PE = PE32, 32BIT = 1 64位:PE = PE32+, 32BIT = 0
你自己写就行了。PE架构的核心自从在Windows 95中实现以来就没有发生过重大变化。
下面是一个c#的例子:
public static ushort GetPEArchitecture(string pFilePath)
{
ushort architecture = 0;
try
{
using (System.IO.FileStream fStream = new System.IO.FileStream(pFilePath, System.IO.FileMode.Open, System.IO.FileAccess.Read))
{
using (System.IO.BinaryReader bReader = new System.IO.BinaryReader(fStream))
{
// Check the MZ signature
if (bReader.ReadUInt16() == 23117)
{
// Seek to e_lfanew.
fStream.Seek(0x3A, System.IO.SeekOrigin.Current);
// Seek to the start of the NT header.
fStream.Seek(bReader.ReadUInt32(), System.IO.SeekOrigin.Begin);
if (bReader.ReadUInt32() == 17744) // Check the PE\0\0 signature.
{
// Seek past the file header,
fStream.Seek(20, System.IO.SeekOrigin.Current);
// Read the magic number of the optional header.
architecture = bReader.ReadUInt16();
}
}
}
}
}
catch (Exception) { /* TODO: Any exception handling you want
to do, personally I just take 0
as a sign of failure */
}
// If architecture returns 0, there has been an error.
return architecture;
}
}
现在的常数是:
0x10B - PE32 format.
0x20B - PE32+ format.
但是用这种方法,它允许新常数的可能性。只要验证你认为合适的返回。