FetchType的区别是什么。LAZY和FetchType。Java持久性API中的EAGER ?


当前回答

Book.java

        import java.io.Serializable;
        import javax.persistence.Column;
        import javax.persistence.Entity;
        import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue;
        import javax.persistence.GenerationType;
        import javax.persistence.Id;
        import javax.persistence.ManyToOne;
        import javax.persistence.Table;

        @Entity
        @Table(name="Books")
        public class Books implements Serializable{

        private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
        @Id
        @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
        @Column(name="book_id")
        private int id;
        @Column(name="book_name")
        private String name;

        @Column(name="author_name")
        private String authorName;

        @ManyToOne
        Subject subject;

        public Subject getSubject() {
            return subject;
        }
        public void setSubject(Subject subject) {
            this.subject = subject;
        }

        public int getId() {
            return id;
        }
        public void setId(int id) {
            this.id = id;
        }
        public String getName() {
            return name;
        }
        public void setName(String name) {
            this.name = name;
        }
        public String getAuthorName() {
            return authorName;
        }
        public void setAuthorName(String authorName) {
            this.authorName = authorName;
        }

        }

Subject.java

    import java.io.Serializable;
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.List;
    import javax.persistence.CascadeType;
    import javax.persistence.Column;
    import javax.persistence.Entity;
    import javax.persistence.FetchType;
    import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; 
    import javax.persistence.GenerationType;
    import javax.persistence.Id;
    import javax.persistence.OneToMany;
    import javax.persistence.Table;

    @Entity
    @Table(name="Subject")
    public class Subject implements Serializable{

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    @Column(name="subject_id")
    private int id;
    @Column(name="subject_name")
    private String name;
    /**
    Observe carefully i have mentioned fetchType.EAGER. By default its is fetchType.LAZY for @OneToMany i have mentioned it but not required. Check the Output by changing it to fetchType.EAGER
    */

    @OneToMany(mappedBy="subject",cascade=CascadeType.ALL,fetch=FetchType.LAZY,
orphanRemoval=true)
    List<Books> listBooks=new ArrayList<Books>();

    public List<Books> getListBooks() {
        return listBooks;
    }
    public void setListBooks(List<Books> listBooks) {
        this.listBooks = listBooks;
    }
    public int getId() {
        return id;
    }
    public void setId(int id) {
        this.id = id;
    }
    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }
    public void setName(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }

    }

HibernateUtil.java

import org.hibernate.SessionFactory;
import org.hibernate.boot.registry.StandardServiceRegistryBuilder;
import org.hibernate.cfg.Configuration;
public class HibernateUtil {

 private static SessionFactory sessionFactory ;
 static {
    Configuration configuration = new Configuration();
    configuration.addAnnotatedClass (Com.OneToMany.Books.class);
    configuration.addAnnotatedClass (Com.OneToMany.Subject.class);
    configuration.setProperty("connection.driver_class","com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.url", "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/hibernate");                                
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.username", "root");     
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.connection.password", "root");
    configuration.setProperty("dialect", "org.hibernate.dialect.MySQLDialect");
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto", "update");
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.show_sql", "true");
    configuration.setProperty(" hibernate.connection.pool_size", "10");
    configuration.setProperty(" hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache", "true");
    configuration.setProperty(" hibernate.cache.use_query_cache", "true");
    configuration.setProperty(" cache.provider_class", "org.hibernate.cache.EhCacheProvider");
    configuration.setProperty("hibernate.cache.region.factory_class" ,"org.hibernate.cache.ehcache.EhCacheRegionFactory");

   // configuration
    StandardServiceRegistryBuilder builder = new StandardServiceRegistryBuilder().applySettings(configuration.getProperties());
    sessionFactory = configuration.buildSessionFactory(builder.build());
 }
public static SessionFactory getSessionFactory() {
    return sessionFactory;
}
} 

Main.java

    import org.hibernate.Session;
    import org.hibernate.SessionFactory;

    public class Main {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SessionFactory factory=HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory();
        save(factory);
        retrieve(factory);

    }

     private static void retrieve(SessionFactory factory) {
        Session session=factory.openSession();
        try{
            session.getTransaction().begin();
            Subject subject=(Subject)session.get(Subject.class, 1);
            System.out.println("subject associated collection is loading lazily as @OneToMany is lazy loaded");

            Books books=(Books)session.get(Books.class, 1);
            System.out.println("books associated collection is loading eagerly as by default @ManyToOne is Eagerly loaded");
            /*Books b1=(Books)session.get(Books.class, new Integer(1));

            Subject sub=session.get(Subject.class, 1);
            sub.getListBooks().remove(b1);
            session.save(sub);
            session.getTransaction().commit();*/
        }catch(Exception e){
            e.printStackTrace();
        }finally{
            session.close();
        }

        }

       private static void save(SessionFactory factory){
        Subject subject=new Subject();
        subject.setName("C++");

        Books books=new Books();
        books.setAuthorName("Bala");
        books.setName("C++ Book");
        books.setSubject(subject);

        subject.getListBooks().add(books);
        Session session=factory.openSession();
        try{
        session.beginTransaction();

        session.save(subject);

        session.getTransaction().commit();
        }catch(Exception e){
            e.printStackTrace();
        }finally{
            session.close();
        }
    }

    }

检查Main.java的retrieve()方法。当我们获取Subject时,它的集合listBooks(带有@OneToMany注解)将被惰性加载。但是,另一方面,Books与集合主题相关的关联,带有@ManyToOne注释,会快速加载(@ManyToOne的[默认值][1],fetchType=EAGER)。我们可以通过放置fetchType来改变这种行为。在@OneToMany Subject.java或fetchType上执行EAGER。LAZY on @ManyToOne in Books.java。

其他回答

对集合的EAGER加载意味着在获取它们的父类时,它们被完全获取。如果你有课程并且它有List<Student>,所有的学生在课程被获取的同时从数据库中获取。

另一方面,LAZY意味着只有当您试图访问List的内容时才会获取它们。例如,调用course.getStudents().iterator()。调用List上的任何访问方法都将启动对数据库的调用以检索元素。这是通过围绕列表(或集合)创建代理来实现的。所以对于惰性集合,具体的类型不是ArrayList和HashSet,而是PersistentSet和PersistentList(或PersistentBag)。

Hibernate默认选择Lazy Fetch类型,除非显式地标记Eager Fetch类型。为了更准确和简洁,差异可以表述如下。

FetchType。LAZY =它不会加载关系,除非你通过getter方法调用它。

FetchType。EAGER =加载所有的关系。

这两种取回类型的优缺点。

延迟初始化通过避免不必要的计算和减少内存需求来提高性能。

主动初始化占用内存较多,处理速度较慢。

话虽如此,这两个初始化中的任何一个都可以使用,这取决于具体情况。

JOIN很重要

轻松地看待它:

假设我们有一个叫User的类和另一个叫Address的类,假设每个用户都有一个或多个地址,意思是关系(一对多),如果执行:

FetchType。LAZY执行sql命令,就像没有join一样:

SELECT * FROM users 

FetchType。执行sql命令:

SELECT * FROM users u join address a on a.user_id = u.user_id

注意:以上查询只是为您澄清图像,但Hibernate框架实际执行的查询与上述查询类似。

哪种获取类型更好?

由于Eager抓取会自动加载所有关系,这是一个很大的性能消耗 除非被告知,否则惰性抓取不会加载任何关系,这将带来更好的性能 即时抓取使得编程更容易,因为需要的代码更少 如果整个系统没有经过适当的测试,延迟加载可能会导致错误(异常) 考虑到所有因素,您仍然应该更喜欢Lazy加载而不是Eager加载,因为它的性能更好

如果你正在使用Spring引导框架,那么就进入应用程序。属性文件并添加下面的命令以了解到底发生了什么。

logging.level.org.hibernate.SQL=DEBUG
logging.level.org.hibernate.type.descriptor.sql.BasicBinder=TRACE

据我所知,这两种类型的取回取决于你的要求。

FetchType。LAZY是按需的(即当我们需要数据时)。

FetchType。EAGER是即时的(即在我们的需求到来之前,我们不必要地获取记录)

这两种类型的抓取之间的主要区别是数据加载到内存中的时刻。 我附上了2张照片来帮助你理解这一点。

急于获取

延迟获取