我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
当前回答
这不应该是线程安全的,避免第一次调用后昂贵的锁定吗?
+ (MySingleton*)sharedInstance
{
if (sharedInstance == nil) {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedInstance == nil) {
sharedInstance = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
}
}
}
return (MySingleton *)sharedInstance;
}
其他回答
static MyClass *sharedInst = nil; + (id)sharedInstance { @synchronize( self ) { if ( sharedInst == nil ) { /* sharedInst set up in init */ [[self alloc] init]; } } return sharedInst; } - (id)init { if ( sharedInst != nil ) { [NSException raise:NSInternalInconsistencyException format:@"[%@ %@] cannot be called; use +[%@ %@] instead"], NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd), NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(@selector(sharedInstance)"]; } else if ( self = [super init] ) { sharedInst = self; /* Whatever class specific here */ } return sharedInst; } /* These probably do nothing in a GC app. Keeps singleton as an actual singleton in a non CG app */ - (NSUInteger)retainCount { return NSUIntegerMax; } - (oneway void)release { } - (id)retain { return sharedInst; } - (id)autorelease { return sharedInst; }
这不应该是线程安全的,避免第一次调用后昂贵的锁定吗?
+ (MySingleton*)sharedInstance
{
if (sharedInstance == nil) {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedInstance == nil) {
sharedInstance = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
}
}
}
return (MySingleton *)sharedInstance;
}
这也适用于非垃圾收集环境。
@interface MySingleton : NSObject {
}
+(MySingleton *)sharedManager;
@end
@implementation MySingleton
static MySingleton *sharedMySingleton = nil;
+(MySingleton*)sharedManager {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
[[self alloc] init]; // assignment not done here
}
}
return sharedMySingleton;
}
+(id)allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
sharedMySingleton = [super allocWithZone:zone];
return sharedMySingleton; // assignment and return on first allocation
}
}
return nil; //on subsequent allocation attempts return nil
}
-(void)dealloc {
[super dealloc];
}
-(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
return self;
}
-(id)retain {
return self;
}
-(unsigned)retainCount {
return UINT_MAX; //denotes an object that cannot be release
}
-(void)release {
//do nothing
}
-(id)autorelease {
return self;
}
-(id)init {
self = [super init];
sharedMySingleton = self;
//initialize here
return self;
}
@end
我知道有很多关于这个“问题”的评论,但是我没有看到很多人建议使用宏来定义单例对象。这是一个非常常见的模式,一个宏极大地简化了单例。
下面是我根据我见过的几个Objc实现编写的宏。
Singeton。h
/**
@abstract Helps define the interface of a singleton.
@param TYPE The type of this singleton.
@param NAME The name of the singleton accessor. Must match the name used in the implementation.
@discussion
Typcially the NAME is something like 'sharedThing' where 'Thing' is the prefix-removed type name of the class.
*/
#define SingletonInterface(TYPE, NAME) \
+ (TYPE *)NAME;
/**
@abstract Helps define the implementation of a singleton.
@param TYPE The type of this singleton.
@param NAME The name of the singleton accessor. Must match the name used in the interface.
@discussion
Typcially the NAME is something like 'sharedThing' where 'Thing' is the prefix-removed type name of the class.
*/
#define SingletonImplementation(TYPE, NAME) \
static TYPE *__ ## NAME; \
\
\
+ (void)initialize \
{ \
static BOOL initialized = NO; \
if(!initialized) \
{ \
initialized = YES; \
__ ## NAME = [[TYPE alloc] init]; \
} \
} \
\
\
+ (TYPE *)NAME \
{ \
return __ ## NAME; \
}
使用示例:
我的经理
@interface MyManager
SingletonInterface(MyManager, sharedManager);
// ...
@end
我的经理
@implementation MyManager
- (id)init
{
self = [super init];
if (self) {
// Initialization code here.
}
return self;
}
SingletonImplementation(MyManager, sharedManager);
// ...
@end
为什么界面宏几乎是空的?头文件和代码文件之间的代码一致性;可维护性,以防您想添加更多的自动方法或更改它。
我使用initialize方法创建单例,就像这里(在撰写本文时)最流行的答案中使用的那样。
根据我下面的另一个回答,我认为你应该这样做:
+ (id)sharedFoo
{
static dispatch_once_t once;
static MyFoo *sharedFoo;
dispatch_once(&once, ^ { sharedFoo = [[self alloc] init]; });
return sharedFoo;
}