我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
当前回答
关于Objective-C中单例模式的深入讨论,请看这里:
在Objective-C中使用单例模式
其他回答
这是我放在一起的一个宏:
http://github.com/cjhanson/Objective-C-Optimized-Singleton
它基于马特·加拉格尔的作品 但是将实现改为使用谷歌的Dave MacLachlan所描述的方法swizzling。
我欢迎评论/贡献。
另一个选项是使用+(void)初始化方法。从文档中可以看到:
运行时将initialize发送给程序中的每个类一次,恰好在该类或从该类继承的任何类从程序中发送其第一条消息之前。(因此,如果类没有被使用,方法可能永远不会被调用。)运行时以线程安全的方式将初始化消息发送给类。超类在子类之前收到此消息。
所以你可以这样做:
static MySingleton *sharedSingleton;
+ (void)initialize
{
static BOOL initialized = NO;
if(!initialized)
{
initialized = YES;
sharedSingleton = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
}
}
公认的答案,虽然它编译,是不正确的。
+ (MySingleton*)sharedInstance
{
@synchronized(self) <-------- self does not exist at class scope
{
if (sharedInstance == nil)
sharedInstance = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
}
return sharedInstance;
}
根据苹果文档:
... 您可以采用类似的方法来同步相关类的类方法,使用class对象而不是self。
即使使用self工作,它不应该,这看起来像一个复制和粘贴错误对我来说。 类工厂方法的正确实现应该是:
+ (MySingleton*)getInstance
{
@synchronized([MySingleton class])
{
if (sharedInstance == nil)
sharedInstance = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
}
return sharedInstance;
}
由于Kendall发布了一个线程安全的单例,试图避免锁定成本,我想我也会抛出一个:
#import <libkern/OSAtomic.h>
static void * volatile sharedInstance = nil;
+ (className *) sharedInstance {
while (!sharedInstance) {
className *temp = [[self alloc] init];
if(!OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier(0x0, temp, &sharedInstance)) {
[temp release];
}
}
return sharedInstance;
}
好吧,让我来解释一下这是怎么回事:
Fast case: In normal execution sharedInstance has already been set, so the while loop is never executed and the function returns after simply testing for the variable's existence; Slow case: If sharedInstance doesn't exist, then an instance is allocated and copied into it using a Compare And Swap ('CAS'); Contended case: If two threads both attempt to call sharedInstance at the same time AND sharedInstance doesn't exist at the same time then they will both initialize new instances of the singleton and attempt to CAS it into position. Whichever one wins the CAS returns immediately, whichever one loses releases the instance it just allocated and returns the (now set) sharedInstance. The single OSAtomicCompareAndSwapPtrBarrier acts as both a write barrier for the setting thread and a read barrier from the testing thread.
这也适用于非垃圾收集环境。
@interface MySingleton : NSObject {
}
+(MySingleton *)sharedManager;
@end
@implementation MySingleton
static MySingleton *sharedMySingleton = nil;
+(MySingleton*)sharedManager {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
[[self alloc] init]; // assignment not done here
}
}
return sharedMySingleton;
}
+(id)allocWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
@synchronized(self) {
if (sharedMySingleton == nil) {
sharedMySingleton = [super allocWithZone:zone];
return sharedMySingleton; // assignment and return on first allocation
}
}
return nil; //on subsequent allocation attempts return nil
}
-(void)dealloc {
[super dealloc];
}
-(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
return self;
}
-(id)retain {
return self;
}
-(unsigned)retainCount {
return UINT_MAX; //denotes an object that cannot be release
}
-(void)release {
//do nothing
}
-(id)autorelease {
return self;
}
-(id)init {
self = [super init];
sharedMySingleton = self;
//initialize here
return self;
}
@end