这是一个没有Object.assign（）陷阱的现代解决方案（不通过引用复制）：

const cloneObj = (obj) => {
    return Object.keys(obj).reduce((dolly, key) => {
        dolly[key] = (obj[key].constructor === Object) ?
            cloneObj(obj[key]) :
            obj[key];
        return dolly;
    }, {});
};

根据Apple JavaScript编码指南：

// Create an inner object with a variable x whose default
// value is 3.
function innerObj()
{
        this.x = 3;
}
innerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
    var temp = new innerObj();
    for (myvar in this) {
        // this object does not contain any objects, so
        // use the lightweight copy code.
        temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
    }
    return temp;
}

// Create an outer object with a variable y whose default
// value is 77.
function outerObj()
{
        // The outer object contains an inner object.  Allocate it here.
        this.inner = new innerObj();
        this.y = 77;
}
outerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
    var temp = new outerObj();
    for (myvar in this) {
        if (this[myvar].clone) {
            // This variable contains an object with a
            // clone operator.  Call it to create a copy.
            temp[myvar] = this[myvar].clone();
        } else {
            // This variable contains a scalar value,
            // a string value, or an object with no
            // clone function.  Assign it directly.
            temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

// Allocate an outer object and assign non-default values to variables in
// both the outer and inner objects.
outer = new outerObj;
outer.inner.x = 4;
outer.y = 16;

// Clone the outer object (which, in turn, clones the inner object).
newouter = outer.clone();

// Verify that both values were copied.
alert('inner x is '+newouter.inner.x); // prints 4
alert('y is '+newouter.y); // prints 16

史蒂夫

我认为，在没有库的情况下，缓存的重复性是最好的。

被低估的WeakMap涉及到循环的问题，其中存储对新旧对象的引用可以帮助我们很容易地重建整个树。

我阻止了DOM元素的深度克隆，可能您不想克隆整个页面：）

function deepCopy(object) {
    const cache = new WeakMap(); // Map of old - new references

    function copy(obj) {
        if (typeof obj !== 'object' ||
            obj === null ||
            obj instanceof HTMLElement
        )
            return obj; // primitive value or HTMLElement

        if (obj instanceof Date) 
            return new Date().setTime(obj.getTime());

        if (obj instanceof RegExp) 
            return new RegExp(obj.source, obj.flags);

        if (cache.has(obj)) 
            return cache.get(obj);

        const result = obj instanceof Array ? [] : {};

        cache.set(obj, result); // store reference to object before the recursive starts

        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            for(const o of obj) {
                 result.push(copy(o));
            }
            return result;
        }

        const keys = Object.keys(obj); 

        for (const key of keys)
            result[key] = copy(obj[key]);

        return result;
    }

    return copy(object);
}

一些测试：

// #1
const obj1 = { };
const obj2 = { };
obj1.obj2 = obj2;
obj2.obj1 = obj1; // Trivial circular reference

var copy = deepCopy(obj1);
copy == obj1 // false
copy.obj2 === obj1.obj2 // false
copy.obj2.obj1.obj2 // and so on - no error (correctly cloned).

// #2
const obj = { x: 0 }
const clone = deepCopy({ a: obj, b: obj });
clone.a == clone.b // true

// #3
const arr = [];
arr[0] = arr; // A little bit weird but who cares
clone = deepCopy(arr)
clone == arr // false;
clone[0][0][0][0] == clone // true;

注意：我使用常量、for of循环、=>运算符和WeakMaps来创建更重要的代码。当前的浏览器支持此语法（ES6）

这是一个没有Object.assign（）陷阱的现代解决方案（不通过引用复制）：

const cloneObj = (obj) => {
    return Object.keys(obj).reduce((dolly, key) => {
        dolly[key] = (obj[key].constructor === Object) ?
            cloneObj(obj[key]) :
            obj[key];
        return dolly;
    }, {});
};

好的，这可能是浅层复制的最佳选择。If遵循了许多使用赋值的示例，但它也保留了继承和原型。它也很简单，适用于大多数类数组和对象，但有构造函数要求或只读财产的对象除外。但这意味着它对于TypedArrays、RegExp、Date、Maps、Set和Object版本的原语（Boolean、String等）失败得很惨。

function copy ( a ) { return Object.assign( new a.constructor, a ) }

其中a可以是任何Object或类构造的实例，但对于使用专门的getter和setter或具有构造函数要求的对象来说，它同样不可靠，但对于更简单的情况来说，它很难。它也能处理争论。

您也可以将其应用于原语以获得奇怪的结果，但是。。。除非它最终成为有用的黑客，谁在乎呢。

基本内置对象和数组的结果。。。

> a = { a: 'A', b: 'B', c: 'C', d: 'D' }
{ a: 'A', b: 'B', c: 'C', d: 'D' }
> b = copy( a )
{ a: 'A', b: 'B', c: 'C', d: 'D' }
> a = [1,2,3,4]
[ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
> b = copy( a )
[ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

由于平均get/setter、构造函数必需的参数或只读财产，以及对父亲的冒犯，因此失败。

> a = /\w+/g
/\w+/g
> b = copy( a )  // fails because source and flags are read-only
/(?:)/
> a = new Date ( '1/1/2001' )
2000-12-31T16:00:00.000Z
> b = copy( a )  // fails because Date using methods to get and set things
2017-02-04T14:44:13.990Z
> a = new Boolean( true )
[Boolean: true]
> b = copy( a )  // fails because of of sins against the father
[Boolean: false]
> a = new Number( 37 )
[Number: 37]
> b = copy( a )  // fails because of of sins against the father
[Number: 0]
> a = new String( 'four score and seven years ago our four fathers' )
[String: 'four score and seven years ago our four fathers']
> b = copy( a )  // fails because of of sins against the father
{ [String: ''] '0': 'f', '1': 'o', '2': 'u', '3': 'r', '4': ' ', '5': 's', '6': 'c', '7': 'o', '8': 'r', '9': 'e', '10': ' ', '11': 'a', '12': 'n', '13': 'd', '14': ' ', '15': 's', '16': 'e', '17': 'v', '18': 'e', '19': 'n', '20': ' ', '21': 'y', '22': 'e', '23': 'a', '24': 'r', '25': 's', '26': ' ', '27': 'a', '28': 'g', '29': 'o', '30': ' ', '31': 'o', '32': 'u', '33': 'r', '34': ' ', '35': 'f', '36': 'o', '37': 'u', '38': 'r', '39': ' ', '40': 'f', '41': 'a', '42': 't', '43': 'h', '44': 'e', '45': 'r', '46': 's' } 

可以使用rest运算符克隆阵列或对象

let myObj = {1: 100, 'a': 200};

let clone = {...myObj}; 

clone.a = 300;

console.log(clone.a) // Output :- 300
console.log(myObj.a) // Output :- 200