我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。

如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?


当前回答

我为这个问题提供了答案,因为我在这里没有看到任何解决DOM元素问题的本地递归实现。

问题是<element>具有父属性和子属性,这些属性链接到具有父值和子值的其他元素,这些元素指向原始<element>,从而导致无限递归或循环冗余。

如果你的目标是安全简单的

{
    '123':456
}

……那么这里的任何其他答案都可能奏效。

但如果你有。。。

{
    '123':<reactJSComponent>,
    '456':document.createElement('div'),
}

…那么你需要这样的东西:

    // cloneVariable() : Clone variable, return null for elements or components.
var cloneVariable = function (args) {
    const variable = args.variable;

    if(variable === null) {
            return null;
    }

    if(typeof(variable) === 'object') {
            if(variable instanceof HTMLElement || variable.nodeType > 0) {
                    return null;
            }

            if(Array.isArray(variable)) {
                    var arrayclone = [];

                    variable.forEach((element) => {
                            arrayclone.push(cloneVariable({'variable':element}));
                    });

                    return arrayclone;
            }

            var objectclone = {};

            Object.keys(variable).forEach((field) => {
                    objectclone[field] = cloneVariable({'variable':variable[field]});
            });

            return objectclone;
    }

    return variable;
}

其他回答

如果你对一个浅拷贝没有问题,underscore.js库有一个克隆方法。

y = _.clone(x);

或者你可以像

copiedObject = _.extend({},originalObject);

在我的代码中,我经常定义一个函数(_)来处理副本,这样我就可以将值传递给函数。此代码创建一个深度副本,但保持继承。它还跟踪子副本,以便无需无限循环即可复制自引用对象。请随意使用。

这可能不是最优雅的,但它还没有让我失望。

_ = function(oReferance) {
  var aReferances = new Array();
  var getPrototypeOf = function(oObject) {
    if(typeof(Object.getPrototypeOf)!=="undefined") return Object.getPrototypeOf(oObject);
    var oTest = new Object();
    if(typeof(oObject.__proto__)!=="undefined"&&typeof(oTest.__proto__)!=="undefined"&&oTest.__proto__===Object.prototype) return oObject.__proto__;
    if(typeof(oObject.constructor)!=="undefined"&&typeof(oTest.constructor)!=="undefined"&&oTest.constructor===Object&&typeof(oObject.constructor.prototype)!=="undefined") return oObject.constructor.prototype;
    return Object.prototype;
  };
  var recursiveCopy = function(oSource) {
    if(typeof(oSource)!=="object") return oSource;
    if(oSource===null) return null;
    for(var i=0;i<aReferances.length;i++) if(aReferances[i][0]===oSource) return aReferances[i][1];
    var Copy = new Function();
    Copy.prototype = getPrototypeOf(oSource);
    var oCopy = new Copy();
    aReferances.push([oSource,oCopy]);
    for(sPropertyName in oSource) if(oSource.hasOwnProperty(sPropertyName)) oCopy[sPropertyName] = recursiveCopy(oSource[sPropertyName]);
    return oCopy;
  };
  return recursiveCopy(oReferance);
};

// Examples:
Wigit = function(){};
Wigit.prototype.bInThePrototype = true;
A = new Wigit();
A.nCoolNumber = 7;
B = _(A);
B.nCoolNumber = 8; // A.nCoolNumber is still 7
B.bInThePrototype // true
B instanceof Wigit // true

Jan Turo的上述答案非常接近,由于兼容性问题,可能是在浏览器中使用的最佳选择,但这可能会导致一些奇怪的枚举问题。例如,执行:

for ( var i in someArray ) { ... }

在遍历数组元素后,将clone()方法赋给i。下面是一个避免枚举并适用于node.js的改编:

Object.defineProperty( Object.prototype, "clone", {
    value: function() {
        if ( this.cloneNode )
        {
            return this.cloneNode( true );
        }

        var copy = this instanceof Array ? [] : {};
        for( var attr in this )
        {
            if ( typeof this[ attr ] == "function" || this[ attr ] == null || !this[ attr ].clone )
            {
                copy[ attr ] = this[ attr ];
            }
            else if ( this[ attr ] == this )
            {
                copy[ attr ] = copy;
            }
            else
            {
                copy[ attr ] = this[ attr ].clone();
            }
        }
        return copy;
    }
});

Object.defineProperty( Date.prototype, "clone", {
    value: function() {
        var copy = new Date();
        copy.setTime( this.getTime() );
        return copy;
    }
});

Object.defineProperty( Number.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );
Object.defineProperty( Boolean.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );
Object.defineProperty( String.prototype, "clone", { value: function() { return this; } } );

这避免了使clone()方法可枚举,因为defineProperty()默认为false。

使用jQuery,可以使用extend进行浅层复制:

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend({}, originalObject)

对copiedObject的后续更改不会影响originalObject,反之亦然。

或制作深度副本:

var copiedObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, originalObject)

根据Apple JavaScript编码指南:

// Create an inner object with a variable x whose default
// value is 3.
function innerObj()
{
        this.x = 3;
}
innerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
    var temp = new innerObj();
    for (myvar in this) {
        // this object does not contain any objects, so
        // use the lightweight copy code.
        temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
    }
    return temp;
}

// Create an outer object with a variable y whose default
// value is 77.
function outerObj()
{
        // The outer object contains an inner object.  Allocate it here.
        this.inner = new innerObj();
        this.y = 77;
}
outerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
    var temp = new outerObj();
    for (myvar in this) {
        if (this[myvar].clone) {
            // This variable contains an object with a
            // clone operator.  Call it to create a copy.
            temp[myvar] = this[myvar].clone();
        } else {
            // This variable contains a scalar value,
            // a string value, or an object with no
            // clone function.  Assign it directly.
            temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

// Allocate an outer object and assign non-default values to variables in
// both the outer and inner objects.
outer = new outerObj;
outer.inner.x = 4;
outer.y = 16;

// Clone the outer object (which, in turn, clones the inner object).
newouter = outer.clone();

// Verify that both values were copied.
alert('inner x is '+newouter.inner.x); // prints 4
alert('y is '+newouter.y); // prints 16

史蒂夫