我有一个Java main类,在这个类中,我启动一个新线程,在main中,它等待线程死亡。在某个时刻,我从线程抛出运行时异常,但我无法捕获从主类中的线程抛出的异常。

代码如下:

public class Test extends Thread
{
  public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException
  {
    Test t = new Test();

    try
    {
      t.start();
      t.join();
    }
    catch(RuntimeException e)
    {
      System.out.println("** RuntimeException from main");
    }

    System.out.println("Main stoped");
  }

  @Override
  public void run()
  {
    try
    {
      while(true)
      {
        System.out.println("** Started");

        sleep(2000);

        throw new RuntimeException("exception from thread");
      }
    }
    catch (RuntimeException e)
    {
      System.out.println("** RuntimeException from thread");

      throw e;
    } 
    catch (InterruptedException e)
    {

    }
  }
}

有人知道为什么吗?


当前回答

你不能这样做,因为这真的没有意义。如果您没有调用t.join(),那么当t线程抛出异常时,主线程可能位于代码中的任何位置。

其他回答

你不能这样做,因为这真的没有意义。如果您没有调用t.join(),那么当t线程抛出异常时,主线程可能位于代码中的任何位置。

使用Callable而不是Thread,然后你可以调用Future#get(),它会抛出Callable抛出的任何异常。

我用RxJava的解决方案:

@Test(expectedExceptions = TestException.class)
public void testGetNonexistentEntry() throws Exception
{
    // using this to work around the limitation where the errors in onError (in subscribe method)
    // cannot be thrown out to the main thread
    AtomicReference<Exception> ex = new AtomicReference<>();
    URI id = getRandomUri();
    canonicalMedia.setId(id);

    client.get(id.toString())
        .subscribe(
            m ->
                fail("Should not be successful"),
            e ->
                ex.set(new TestException()));

    for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
    {
        if(ex.get() != null)
            throw ex.get();
        else
            Thread.sleep(1000);
    }
    Assert.fail("Cannot find the exception to throw.");
}

AtomicReference也是一个将错误传递给主线程的解决方案。与Dan Cruz的方法相同。

AtomicReference<Throwable> errorReference = new AtomicReference<>();

    Thread thread = new Thread() {
        public void run() {
            throw new RuntimeException("TEST EXCEPTION");

        }
    };
    thread.setUncaughtExceptionHandler((th, ex) -> {
        errorReference.set(ex);
    });
    thread.start();
    thread.join();
    Throwable newThreadError= errorReference.get();
    if (newThreadError!= null) {
        throw newThreadError;
    }  

唯一的变化是你可以使用AtomicReference而不是创建一个volatile变量,它在幕后做了同样的事情。

如果你实现Thread。在启动线程的类UncaughtExceptionHandler中,你可以设置并重新抛出异常:

public final class ThreadStarter implements Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler{

private volatile Throwable initException;

    public void doSomeInit(){
        Thread t = new Thread(){
            @Override
            public void run() {
              throw new RuntimeException("UNCAUGHT");
            }
        };
        t.setUncaughtExceptionHandler(this);

        t.start();
        t.join();

        if (initException != null){
            throw new RuntimeException(initException);
        }

    }

    @Override
    public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable e) {
        initException =  e;
    }    

}

这将导致以下输出:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: UNCAUGHT
    at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter.doSomeInit(ThreadStarter.java:24)
    at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter.main(ThreadStarter.java:38)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: UNCAUGHT
    at com.gs.gss.ccsp.enrichments.ThreadStarter$1.run(ThreadStarter.java:15)