在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
当前回答
这是我用的。它结合了进程枚举来执行切换和互斥,以防止“活动点击器”:
public partial class App
{
[DllImport("user32")]
private static extern int OpenIcon(IntPtr hWnd);
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
private static extern bool SetForegroundWindow(IntPtr hWnd);
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e)
{
base.OnStartup(e);
var p = Process
.GetProcessesByName(Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName);
foreach (var t in p.Where(t => t.MainWindowHandle != IntPtr.Zero))
{
OpenIcon(t.MainWindowHandle);
SetForegroundWindow(t.MainWindowHandle);
Current.Shutdown();
return;
}
// there is a chance the user tries to click on the icon repeatedly
// and the process cannot be discovered yet
bool createdNew;
var mutex = new Mutex(true, "MyAwesomeApp",
out createdNew); // must be a variable, though it is unused -
// we just need a bit of time until the process shows up
if (!createdNew)
{
Current.Shutdown();
return;
}
new Bootstrapper().Run();
}
}
其他回答
我在解决方案中使用互斥来防止多个实例。
static Mutex mutex = null;
//A string that is the name of the mutex
string mutexName = @"Global\test";
//Prevent Multiple Instances of Application
bool onlyInstance = false;
mutex = new Mutex(true, mutexName, out onlyInstance);
if (!onlyInstance)
{
MessageBox.Show("You are already running this application in your system.", "Already Running..", MessageBoxButton.OK);
Application.Current.Shutdown();
}
请看下面的代码。它是防止一个WPF应用程序有多个实例的一个很好的简单解决方案。
private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
Process thisProc = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
if (Process.GetProcessesByName(thisProc.ProcessName).Length > 1)
{
MessageBox.Show("Application running");
Application.Current.Shutdown();
return;
}
var wLogin = new LoginWindow();
if (wLogin.ShowDialog() == true)
{
var wMain = new Main();
wMain.WindowState = WindowState.Maximized;
wMain.Show();
}
else
{
Application.Current.Shutdown();
}
}
这么简单的问题有这么多答案。稍微改变一下这里是我对这个问题的解决方案。
Creating a Mutex can be troublesome because the JIT-er only sees you using it for a small portion of your code and wants to mark it as ready for garbage collection. It pretty much wants to out-smart you thinking you are not going to be using that Mutex for that long. In reality you want to hang onto this Mutex for as long as your application is running. The best way to tell the garbage collector to leave you Mutex alone is to tell it to keep it alive though out the different generations of garage collection. Example:
var m = new Mutex(...);
...
GC.KeepAlive(m);
我从这个网页上获得了灵感:http://www.ai.uga.edu/~mc/SingleInstance.html
这是我的整个App.xaml.cs,这段代码也将启动的程序实例带到前台:
public partial class App : Application
{
private static Mutex _mutex = null;
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern bool SetForegroundWindow(IntPtr hWnd);
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern bool ShowWindow(IntPtr hWnd, int nCmdShow);
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e)
{
_mutex = new Mutex(true, "YourMutexName", out var createdNew);
if (!createdNew)
{
using (var currentProcess = Process.GetCurrentProcess())
{
foreach (var process in Process.GetProcessesByName(currentProcess.ProcessName))
{
if (process.Id != currentProcess.Id)
{
ShowWindow(process.MainWindowHandle, 9);
SetForegroundWindow(process.MainWindowHandle);
}
process.Dispose();
}
}
// app is already running! Exiting the application
Shutdown();
}
base.OnStartup(e);
}
protected override void OnExit(ExitEventArgs e)
{
_mutex.Dispose();
base.OnExit(e);
}
}
永远不要使用命名互斥来实现单实例应用程序(至少在生产代码中不要这样做)。恶意代码可以很容易地DoS(拒绝服务)你的屁股…