这个问题直接类似于TypeScript中的类类型检查
我需要在运行时找出任何类型的变量是否实现了接口。这是我的代码:
interface A{
member:string;
}
var a:any={member:"foobar"};
if(a instanceof A) alert(a.member);
如果您在typescript游乐场中输入这段代码，最后一行将被标记为错误，“名称A不存在于当前作用域”。但事实并非如此，该名称确实存在于当前作用域中。我甚至可以更改变量声明为var a: a ={成员:"foobar"};没有编辑的抱怨。在浏览网页并找到其他问题后，我将接口更改为类，但我不能使用对象字面量来创建实例。
我想知道A类型是如何消失的，但看看生成的javascript就能解释这个问题:
var a = {
member: "foobar"
};
if(a instanceof A) {
alert(a.member);
}
没有将A表示为接口，因此不可能进行运行时类型检查。
我知道javascript作为一种动态语言没有接口的概念。是否有方法对接口进行类型检查?
typescript游乐场的自动完成显示typescript甚至提供了一个方法实现。我怎么使用它?
因为在运行时类型是未知的，所以我写了如下代码来比较未知对象，不是与类型进行比较，而是与已知类型的对象进行比较:
创建正确类型的示例对象
指定它的哪些元素是可选的
将你的未知对象与这个样本对象进行深度比较
下面是我用于深度比较的(接口不可知)代码:
function assertTypeT<T>(loaded: any, wanted: T, optional?: Set<string>): T {
// this is called recursively to compare each element
function assertType(found: any, wanted: any, keyNames?: string): void {
if (typeof wanted !== typeof found) {
throw new Error(`assertType expected ${typeof wanted} but found ${typeof found}`);
}
switch (typeof wanted) {
case "boolean":
case "number":
case "string":
return; // primitive value type -- done checking
case "object":
break; // more to check
case "undefined":
case "symbol":
case "function":
default:
throw new Error(`assertType does not support ${typeof wanted}`);
}
if (Array.isArray(wanted)) {
if (!Array.isArray(found)) {
throw new Error(`assertType expected an array but found ${found}`);
}
if (wanted.length === 1) {
// assume we want a homogenous array with all elements the same type
for (const element of found) {
assertType(element, wanted[0]);
}
} else {
// assume we want a tuple
if (found.length !== wanted.length) {
throw new Error(
`assertType expected tuple length ${wanted.length} found ${found.length}`);
}
for (let i = 0; i < wanted.length; ++i) {
assertType(found[i], wanted[i]);
}
}
return;
}
for (const key in wanted) {
const expectedKey = keyNames ? keyNames + "." + key : key;
if (typeof found[key] === 'undefined') {
if (!optional || !optional.has(expectedKey)) {
throw new Error(`assertType expected key ${expectedKey}`);
}
} else {
assertType(found[key], wanted[key], expectedKey);
}
}
}
assertType(loaded, wanted);
return loaded as T;
}
下面是我如何使用它的一个例子。
在本例中，我期望JSON包含一个元组数组，其中第二个元素是一个名为User的接口实例(它有两个可选元素)。
TypeScript的类型检查将确保我的示例对象是正确的，然后assertTypeT函数检查未知(从JSON加载的)对象是否与示例对象匹配。
export function loadUsers(): Map<number, User> {
const found = require("./users.json");
const sample: [number, User] = [
49942,
{
"name": "ChrisW",
"email": "example@example.com",
"gravatarHash": "75bfdecf63c3495489123fe9c0b833e1",
"profile": {
"location": "Normandy",
"aboutMe": "I wrote this!\n\nFurther details are to be supplied ..."
},
"favourites": []
}
];
const optional: Set<string> = new Set<string>(["profile.aboutMe", "profile.location"]);
const loaded: [number, User][] = assertTypeT(found, [sample], optional);
return new Map<number, User>(loaded);
}
您可以在用户定义的类型保护的实现中调用这样的检查。
基于Fenton的回答，下面是我实现的一个函数，用于验证给定对象是否具有接口所具有的键(全部或部分)。
根据您的用例，您可能还需要检查每个接口属性的类型。下面的代码不会这样做。
function implementsTKeys<T>(obj: any, keys: (keyof T)[]): obj is T {
if (!obj || !Array.isArray(keys)) {
return false;
}
const implementKeys = keys.reduce((impl, key) => impl && key in obj, true);
return implementKeys;
}
用法示例:
interface A {
propOfA: string;
methodOfA: Function;
}
let objectA: any = { propOfA: '' };
// Check if objectA partially implements A
let implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA']);
console.log(implementsA); // true
objectA.methodOfA = () => true;
// Check if objectA fully implements A
implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA', 'methodOfA']);
console.log(implementsA); // true
objectA = {};
// Check again if objectA fully implements A
implementsA = implementsTKeys<A>(objectA, ['propOfA', 'methodOfA']);
console.log(implementsA); // false, as objectA now is an empty object
你可以在没有instanceof关键字的情况下实现你想要的，因为你现在可以编写自定义类型保护:
interface A {
member: string;
}
function instanceOfA(object: any): object is A {
return 'member' in object;
}
var a: any = {member: "foobar"};
if (instanceOfA(a)) {
alert(a.member);
}
会员众多
如果需要检查大量成员以确定对象是否与您的类型匹配，则可以添加标识符。下面是最基本的示例，并要求您管理自己的鉴别器…您需要深入了解模式，以确保避免重复标识符。
interface A {
discriminator: 'I-AM-A';
member: string;
}
function instanceOfA(object: any): object is A {
return object.discriminator === 'I-AM-A';
}
var a: any = {discriminator: 'I-AM-A', member: "foobar"};
if (instanceOfA(a)) {
alert(a.member);
}
export interface ConfSteps {
group: string;
key: string;
steps: string[];
}
private verify(): void {
const obj = `{
"group": "group",
"key": "key",
"steps": [],
"stepsPlus": []
} `;
if (this.implementsObject<ConfSteps>(obj, ['group', 'key', 'steps'])) {
console.log(`Implements ConfSteps: ${obj}`);
}
}
private objProperties: Array<string> = [];
private implementsObject<T>(obj: any, keys: (keyof T)[]): boolean {
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj), (key, value) => {
this.objProperties.push(key);
});
for (const key of keys) {
if (!this.objProperties.includes(key.toString())) {
return false;
}
}
this.objProperties = null;
return true;
}
在我看来，这是最好的方法;在接口上附加一个“Fubber”符号。它的编写速度要快得多，对于JavaScript引擎来说，它比类型保护快得多，它支持接口的继承，如果你需要的话，它使类型保护易于编写。
这就是ES6有符号的目的。
接口
// Notice there is no naming conflict, because interfaces are a *type*
export const IAnimal = Symbol("IAnimal");
export interface IAnimal {
[IAnimal]: boolean; // the fubber
}
export const IDog = Symbol("IDog");
export interface IDog extends IAnimal {
[IDog]: boolean;
}
export const IHound = Symbol("IDog");
export interface IHound extends IDog {
// The fubber can also be typed as only 'true'; meaning it can't be disabled.
[IDog]: true;
[IHound]: boolean;
}
类
import { IDog, IAnimal } from './interfaces';
class Dog implements IDog {
// Multiple fubbers to handle inheritance:
[IAnimal] = true;
[IDog] = true;
}
class Hound extends Dog implements IHound {
[IHound] = true;
}
测试
如果你想帮助TypeScript编译器，这段代码可以放在类型保护中。
import { IDog, IAnimal } from './interfaces';
let dog = new Dog();
if (dog instanceof Hound || dog[IHound]) {
// false
}
if (dog[IAnimal]?) {
// true
}
let houndDog = new Hound();
if (houndDog[IDog]) {
// true
}
if (dog[IDog]?) {
// it definitely is a dog
}
