对于子-父通信，您应该传递一个函数来设置从父到子的状态，如下所示

class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this)
  }

  handler() {
    this.setState({
      someVar: 'some value'
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {this.props.handler}/ >
  }
}

这样，子进程就可以通过调用带有props的函数来更新父进程的状态。

但是你必须重新考虑组件的结构，因为根据我的理解，组件5和组件3是不相关的。

一种可能的解决方案是将它们包装在一个更高级别的组件中，该组件将同时包含组件1和组件3的状态。该组件将通过props设置较低级别的状态。

我找到了以下工作解决方案，将onClick函数参数从子组件传递给父组件:

传递方法()的版本

//ChildB component
class ChildB extends React.Component {

    render() {

        var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
        return (<div><button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>
            Push me
          </button>
        </div>)
    }
}

//ParentA component
class ParentA extends React.Component {

    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate.bind(this);
        var arg1 = '';
    }

    handleToUpdate(someArg){
        alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: ' + someArg);
        this.setState({arg1:someArg});
    }

    render() {
        var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate;

        return (<div>
                    <ChildB handleToUpdate = {handleToUpdate.bind(this)} /></div>)
    }
}

if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
    ReactDOM.render(
        <ParentA />,
        document.querySelector("#demo")
    );
}

看看JSFiddle

使用传递箭头函数的版本

//ChildB component
class ChildB extends React.Component {

    render() {

        var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
        return (<div>
          <button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>
            Push me
          </button>
        </div>)
    }
}

//ParentA component
class ParentA extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
    }

    handleToUpdate = (someArg) => {
            alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: ' + someArg);
    }

    render() {
        return (<div>
            <ChildB handleToUpdate = {this.handleToUpdate} /></div>)
    }
}

if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
    ReactDOM.render(
        <ParentA />,
        document.querySelector("#demo")
    );
}

看看JSFiddle

当您需要在子节点和父节点之间进行任何级别的通信时，最好利用上下文。在父组件中定义可以被子组件调用的上下文，例如:

在父组件中，在你的案例中，组件3，

static childContextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

getChildContext() {
    return {
        parentMethod: (parameter_from_child) => this.parentMethod(parameter_from_child)
    };
}

parentMethod(parameter_from_child){
    // Update the state with parameter_from_child
}

现在在子组件中(在你的例子中是组件5)，只需告诉这个组件它想要使用它的父组件的上下文。

static contextTypes = {
    parentMethod: React.PropTypes.func.isRequired
};

render() {
    return(
        <TouchableHighlight
            onPress = {() => this.context.parentMethod(new_state_value)}
            underlayColor='gray' >

            <Text> update state in parent component </Text>

        </TouchableHighlight>
)}

您可以在这个GitHub存储库中找到Demo项目。

我喜欢关于传递函数的答案。这是一个非常方便的技巧。

On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).

import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'

const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()

// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
  state = {
    text: 'foo'
  } 

  componentDidMount() {
    dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
      if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
        this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
      }
    }
  }

  render() {
    return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
  }
}

// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
  dispatcher.dispatch({
    type: 'change'
  })
}

// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
  return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button> 
}

使用Flux的调度程序捆绑非常简单。它只是简单地注册回调，并在任何分派发生时调用它们，传递分派上的内容(在上面的简洁示例中，分派没有有效负载，只有一个消息id)。如果对您更有意义的话，您可以很容易地将其调整为传统的pub/sub(例如，从事件中使用EventEmitter或其他版本)。

我想感谢得到最多赞的回答，因为他给了我自己的问题的想法，基本上是用箭头函数和从子组件传递参数的变化:

 class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    // without bind, replaced by arrow func below
  }

  handler = (val) => {
    this.setState({
      someVar: val
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {() => this.props.handler('the passing value')}/ >
  }
}

希望它能帮助到别人。

我找到了以下工作解决方案，将onClick函数参数从子组件传递给带有参数的父组件:

父类:

class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    // Bind the this context to the handler function
    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this);

    // Set some state
    this.state = {
        messageShown: false
    };
}

// This method will be sent to the child component
handler(param1) {
console.log(param1);
    this.setState({
        messageShown: true
    });
}

// Render the child component and set the action property with the handler as value
render() {
    return <Child action={this.handler} />
}}

子类:

class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
    return (
        <div>
            {/* The button will execute the handler function set by the parent component */}
            <Button onClick={this.props.action.bind(this,param1)} />
        </div>
    )
} }