@Component auto detects and configures the beans using classpath scanning whereas @Bean explicitly declares a single bean, rather than letting Spring do it automatically. @Component does not decouple the declaration of the bean from the class definition where as @Bean decouples the declaration of the bean from the class definition. @Component is a class level annotation whereas @Bean is a method level annotation and name of the method serves as the bean name. @Component need not to be used with the @Configuration annotation where as @Bean annotation has to be used within the class which is annotated with @Configuration. We cannot create a bean of a class using @Component, if the class is outside spring container whereas we can create a bean of a class using @Bean even if the class is present outside the spring container. @Component has different specializations like @Controller, @Repository and @Service whereas @Bean has no specializations.

这两种方法都旨在在Spring容器中注册目标类型。

区别在于@Bean适用于方法，而@Component适用于类型。

因此，当您使用@Bean注释时，您可以在方法主体中控制实例创建逻辑(参见上面的示例)。而@Component注释则不行。

@Component和@Bean做两件完全不同的事情，不应该混淆。

@Component(以及@Service和@Repository)用于使用类路径扫描自动检测和自动配置bean。在带注释的类和bean之间存在隐式的一对一映射(即每个类一个bean)。这种方法对连接的控制非常有限，因为它是纯声明性的。

@Bean用于显式地声明单个bean，而不是像上面那样让Spring自动执行。它将bean的声明与类定义解耦，并允许您按照自己的选择创建和配置bean。

回答你的问题…

是否有可能重用@Component注释而不是引入@Bean注释?

当然,可能;但他们选择不这样做，因为这两者是完全不同的。春天已经够让人迷惑了，不要再把水弄脏了。

当您使用@Component标记时，这与使用带有香草bean声明方法(用@Bean注释)的POJO(普通旧Java对象)是一样的。例如，下面的方法1和2将给出相同的结果。

方法1

@Component
public class SomeClass {

    private int number;

    public SomeClass(Integer theNumber){
        this.number = theNumber.intValue();
    }

    public int getNumber(){
        return this.number;
    }
}

用豆子表示“数字”:

@Bean
Integer theNumber(){
    return new Integer(3456);
}

方法2

//Note: no @Component tag
public class SomeClass {

    private int number;

    public SomeClass(Integer theNumber){
        this.number = theNumber.intValue();
    }

    public int getNumber(){
        return this.number;
    }
}

两者都有豆子:

@Bean
Integer theNumber(){
    return new Integer(3456);
}

@Bean
SomeClass someClass(Integer theNumber){
    return new SomeClass(theNumber);
}

方法2允许您将bean声明放在一起，它更加灵活。您甚至可能想要添加另一个非香草SomeClass bean，如下所示:

@Bean
SomeClass strawberryClass(){
    return new SomeClass(new Integer(1));
}

假设我想要特定的实现依赖于某种动态状态。 @Bean非常适合这种情况。

@Bean
@Scope("prototype")
public SomeService someService() {
    switch (state) {
    case 1:
        return new Impl1();
    case 2:
        return new Impl2();
    case 3:
        return new Impl3();
    default:
        return new Impl();
    }
}

然而，@Component没有办法做到这一点。

@component and its specializations(@Controller, @service, @repository) allow for auto-detection using classpath scanning. If we see component class like @Controller, @service, @repository will be scan automatically by the spring framework using the component scan. @Bean on the other hand can only be used to explicitly declare a single bean in a configuration class. @Bean used to explicitly declare a single bean, rather than letting spring do it automatically. Its make septate declaration of bean from the class definition. In short @Controller, @service, @repository are for auto-detection and @Bean to create seprate bean from class

    - @Controller
    public class LoginController 
    { --code-- }

    - @Configuration
    public class AppConfig {
    @Bean
    public SessionFactory sessionFactory() 
    {--code-- }