我知道在spring 2.5中引入@Component注释是为了通过使用类路径扫描来摆脱xml bean定义。

@Bean是在spring 3.0中引入的,可以和@Configuration一起使用,以便完全摆脱xml文件,而使用java配置。

是否有可能重用@Component注释而不是引入@Bean注释?我的理解是,最终目标是在这两种情况下都创建bean。


当前回答

1. 关于@ component @Component的功能类似于@Configuration。 它们都表明带注释的类有一个或多个需要注册到Spring-IOC-Container的bean。 由@Component注释的类,我们称之为Spring的Component。它是一个包含多个bean的概念。 Spring需要自动扫描组件类来注册组件类的那些bean。

2. 关于@ bean @Bean用于注释组件类的方法(如上所述)。它表示由带注释的方法返回的实例需要注册到Spring-IOC-Container。

3.结论 两者的区别是比较明显的,它们在不同的情况下使用。 一般用法是:

    // @Configuration is implemented by @Component
    @Configuration
    public ComponentClass {

      @Bean
      public FirstBean FirstBeanMethod() {
        return new FirstBean();
      }

      @Bean
      public SecondBean SecondBeanMethod() {
        return new SecondBean();
      }
    }

其他回答

1. 关于@ component @Component的功能类似于@Configuration。 它们都表明带注释的类有一个或多个需要注册到Spring-IOC-Container的bean。 由@Component注释的类,我们称之为Spring的Component。它是一个包含多个bean的概念。 Spring需要自动扫描组件类来注册组件类的那些bean。

2. 关于@ bean @Bean用于注释组件类的方法(如上所述)。它表示由带注释的方法返回的实例需要注册到Spring-IOC-Container。

3.结论 两者的区别是比较明显的,它们在不同的情况下使用。 一般用法是:

    // @Configuration is implemented by @Component
    @Configuration
    public ComponentClass {

      @Bean
      public FirstBean FirstBeanMethod() {
        return new FirstBean();
      }

      @Bean
      public SecondBean SecondBeanMethod() {
        return new SecondBean();
      }
    }

@Component auto detects and configures the beans using classpath scanning whereas @Bean explicitly declares a single bean, rather than letting Spring do it automatically. @Component does not decouple the declaration of the bean from the class definition where as @Bean decouples the declaration of the bean from the class definition. @Component is a class level annotation whereas @Bean is a method level annotation and name of the method serves as the bean name. @Component need not to be used with the @Configuration annotation where as @Bean annotation has to be used within the class which is annotated with @Configuration. We cannot create a bean of a class using @Component, if the class is outside spring container whereas we can create a bean of a class using @Bean even if the class is present outside the spring container. @Component has different specializations like @Controller, @Repository and @Service whereas @Bean has no specializations.

创建@Bean是为了避免在编译时耦合Spring和业务规则。这意味着您可以在其他框架(如PlayFramework或JEE)中重用业务规则。

此外,在默认的Spring实例化还不够的情况下,您可以完全控制如何创建bean。

我写了一篇关于它的文章。

https://coderstower.com/2019/04/23/factory-methods-decoupling-ioc-container-abstraction/

You have two ways to generate beans. One is to create a class with an annotation @Component. The other is to create a method and annotate it with @Bean. For those classes containing method with @Bean should be annotated with @Configuration Once you run your spring project, the class with a @ComponentScan annotation would scan every class with @Component on it, and restore the instance of this class to the Ioc Container. Another thing the @ComponentScan would do is running the methods with @Bean on it and restore the return object to the Ioc Container as a bean. So when you need to decide which kind of beans you want to create depending upon current states, you need to use @Bean. You can write the logic and return the object you want. Another thing worth to mention is the name of the method with @Bean is the default name of bean.

这两种方法都旨在在Spring容器中注册目标类型。

区别在于@Bean适用于方法,而@Component适用于类型。

因此,当您使用@Bean注释时,您可以在方法主体中控制实例创建逻辑(参见上面的示例)。而@Component注释则不行。