在这篇文章中有很多开发者没有尝试过MonoTouch和Objective-C的传闻。似乎大多数Objective-C开发者从未尝试过MonoTouch。

我显然是有偏见的，但你可以看看MonoTouch社区一直在做什么:

http://xamarin.com

在那里，你会发现一些开发人员用Objective-C和c#开发的文章。

如果这是你唯一要开发的iPhone应用程序，而你对开发Mac应用程序毫无兴趣，那么MonoTouch可能是值得的。

如果你想要开发更多的iPhone应用，或者想要做一些Mac原生开发，那么学习Objective-C和相关框架可能是值得的。另外，如果你是那种喜欢学习新东西的程序员，这是一个有趣的新范式。

在这篇文章中有很多开发者没有尝试过MonoTouch和Objective-C的传闻。似乎大多数Objective-C开发者从未尝试过MonoTouch。

我显然是有偏见的，但你可以看看MonoTouch社区一直在做什么:

http://xamarin.com

在那里，你会发现一些开发人员用Objective-C和c#开发的文章。

三个字:Linq to SQL

是的，很值。

我最近经常看到这个问题(以及它的变体)。让我惊讶的是，人们经常回复，但很少有人回答。

我有我的偏好(我喜欢这两组)，但这是大多数“答案”开始出错的地方。它不应该是关于我想要什么(或其他人想要什么)。

以下是我如何决定MonoTouch的价值-我不能客观，显然，但我认为这是相当狂热的:

Is this for fun or business? If you wanted to get into consulting in this area, you could make your $399 back very quickly. Do you want to learn the platform inside-out, or do you "just" want to write apps for it? Do you like .Net enough that using a different dev stack would take the fun out of it for you? Again, I like both stacks (Apple and Mono), but for me MonoTouch makes the experience that much more fun. I haven't stopped using Apple's tools, but that's mainly because I really do enjoy both stacks. I love the iPhone, and I love .Net. In that case, for me, MonoTouch was a no-brainer. Do you feel comfortable working with C? I don't mean Objective-C, but C - it matters because Objective-C is C. It's a nice, fancy, friendly OO version, but if pointers give you the heebie-jeebies, MonoTouch is your friend. And don't listen to the naysayers who think you're a dev wuss if it happens that you don't like pointers (or C, etc.). I used to walk around with a copy of the IBM ROM BIOS Pocket Reference, and when I was writing assembly and forcing my computer into funny video modes and writing my own font rendering bits for them and (admittedly trashy) windowing systems, I didn't think the QuickBasic devs were wusses. I was a QuickBasic dev (in addition to the rest). Never give in to nerd machismo. If you don't like C, and if you don't like pointers, and if you want to stay as far away from manual memory management as possible (and, to be fair, it's not bad at all in ObjC), then... MonoTouch. And don't take any guff for it. Would you like to target users or businesses? It doesn't matter much to me, but there are still people out there on Edge, and the fact is: you can create a far smaller download package if you use Apple's stack. I've been playing around with MonoTouch, and I have a decent little app going that, once compressed, gets down to about 2.7 MB (when submitting your app for distribution, you zip it - when apps are downloaded from the store, they're zipped - so when figuring out if your app is going to come in under the 10MB OTA limit, zip the sucker first - you WILL be pleasantly surprised with MonoTouch). But, MT happiness aside, half a meg vs. nearly three (for example) is something that might be important to you if you're targeting end users. If you're thinking of enterprise work, a few MB won't matter at all. And, just to be clear - I'm going to be submitting a MT-based app to the store soonishly, and I have no problem whatsoever with the size. Doesn't bother me at all. But if that's something that would concern you, then Apple's stack wins this one. Doing any XML work? MonoTouch. Period. String manipulation? Date manipulation? A million other little things we've gotten used to with .Net's everything-AND-the-kitchen-sink frameworks? MonoTouch. Web services? MonoTouch. Syntactically, they both have their advantages. Objective-C tends to be more verbose where you have to write it. You'll find yourself writing code with C# you wouldn't have to write with ObjC, but it goes both ways. This particular topic could fill a book. I prefer C# syntax, but after getting over my initial this-is-otherworldly reaction to Objective-C, I've learned to enjoy it quite a bit. I make fun of it a bit in talks (it is weird for devs who're used to C#/Java/etc.), but the truth is that I have an Objective-C shaped spot in my heart that makes me happy. Do you plan to use Interface Builder? Because, even in this early version, I find myself doing far less work to build my UIs with IB and then using them in code. It feels like entire steps are missing from the Objective-C/IB way of doing things, and I'm pretty sure it's because entire steps are missing from the Objective-C/IB way of doing things. So far, and I don't think I've sufficiently tested, but so far, MonoTouch is the winner here for how much less work you have to do. Do you think it's fun to learn new languages and platforms? If so, the iPhone has a lot to offer, and Apple's stack will likely get you out of your comfort-zone - which, for some devs, is fun (Hi - I'm one of those devs - I joke about it and give Apple a hard time, but I've had a lot of fun learning iPhone development through Apple's tools).

要考虑的事情太多了。价值是如此抽象。如果我们谈论的是成本和是否值得，答案就归结为我的第一个项目:如果这是为了生意，如果你能得到这份工作，你就能赚回你的钱。

所以…这是我最客观的评价了。这是一个你可能会问自己的问题的简短清单，但这只是一个起点。

就我个人而言(让我们暂时放弃客观性)，我喜欢并使用这两种方法。我很高兴我先学会了苹果堆栈。当我已经熟悉苹果的世界时，使用MonoTouch会更容易上手。正如其他人所说，你仍然要使用CocoaTouch——它只是将在一个。net化的环境中。

但不止于此。没有使用过MonoTouch的人往往会止步于此——“这是一个包装器等等”——这不是MonoTouch。

MonoTouch让你访问CocoaTouch所提供的功能，同时也让你访问。net所提供的(一个子集)，一个一些人觉得更舒服的IDE(我是其中之一)，更好地与Interface Builder集成，尽管你不能完全忘记内存管理，但你得到了一个很好的余地。

如果你不确定，抓取苹果的堆栈(它是免费的)，抓取MonoTouch的eval堆栈(它是免费的)。在你加入苹果的开发程序之前，这两种软件都只能在模拟器上运行，但这足以帮助你弄清楚你是否更喜欢其中一种，以及MonoTouch对你来说是否值得花399美元。

不要听那些狂热者的话——他们往往是那些没有使用过他们所指责的技术的人:)

作为一个同时拥有c#和Objective-C经验的人，我想说对于大多数人来说Xamarin是物有所值的。

c#是一门设计得很好的语言，c# API也是设计得很好的。当然Cocoa Touch的API(包括UIKit)也有很好的设计，但是语言可以在几个方面得到改进。当你用c#写代码时，你可能会比用Objective-C写相同的代码更有效率。这是由于几个原因，但其中一些原因是:

C# has type inference. Type inference makes writing code quicker, since you don't have to "know" the type on the left-hand side of an assignment. It also makes refactoring easier and more saver. C# has generics, which will reduce errors compared to equivalent Objective-C code (though there are some work-arounds in Objective-C, in most situations developers will avoid them). Recently Xamarin added support for Async / Await, which makes writing asynchronous code very easy. You'll be able to reuse part of the code base on iOS, Android and Windows Phone. MonoTouch largely implements the CocoaTouch API's in a very straightforward way. E.g.: if you've got experience with CocoaTouch, you'll know where to find classes for controls in MonoTouch (MonoTouch.UIKit contains classes for UIButton, UIView, UINavigationController, etc..., likewise MonoTouch.Foundation got classes for NSString, NSData, etc...). Xamarin will give users a native experience, unlike solutions like PhoneGap or Titanium.

现在Objective-C比c#有一些优势，但在大多数情况下，用c#编写应用程序通常会减少开发时间和更清晰的代码，并减少将同一应用程序移植到其他平台的工作。一个值得注意的例外可能是依赖OpenGL的高性能游戏。