我和一个同事正在研究一种解决方案，使用我们公司要求的各种标准将货物装载到卡车上。我一直在研究遗传算法的解决方案，而他正在使用具有激进修剪的分支和绑定。我们仍在实施这个解决方案的过程中，但到目前为止，我们已经取得了良好的结果。

In 2007-9 I developed some software for reading datamatrix patterns. Often these patterns were difficult to read, being indented into scratched surfaces with all kinds of reflectance properties, fuzzy chemically etched markings and so on. I used a GA to fine tune various parameters of the vision algorithms to give the best results on a database of 300 images having known properties. Parameters were things like downsampling resolution, RANSAC parameters, amount of erosion and dilation, low pass filtering radius, and a few others. Running the optimisation over several days this produced results which were about 20% better than naive values on a test set of images unseen during the optimisation phase.

这个系统完全是从零开始编写的，我没有使用任何其他库。我并不反对使用这些东西，只要它们能提供可靠的结果，但是您必须注意许可兼容性和代码可移植性问题。

我曾经尝试制作一个围棋电脑播放器，完全基于基因编程。每个程序都将被视为一系列动作的评估函数。即使是在一个相当小的3x4板上，制作的程序也不是很好。

我使用Perl，并自己编写了所有代码。我今天会做不同的事情。

我年轻时就尝试过GA。我用Python写了一个模拟器，工作原理如下。

这些基因编码了神经网络的权重。

神经网络的输入是检测触摸的“天线”。较高的数值表示非常接近，0表示不接触。

输出是两个“轮子”。如果两个轮子都向前，这个人也向前。如果轮子方向相反，他就会转向。输出的强度决定了车轮转动的速度。

生成了一个简单的迷宫。这真的很简单，甚至很愚蠢。屏幕下方是起点，上方是球门，中间有四面墙。每面墙都有一个随机的空间，所以总是有一条路。

一开始我只是随机挑选一些人(我认为他们是bug)。只要有一个人达到了目标，或者达到了时间限制，就会计算适合度。它与当时到目标的距离成反比。

然后我把它们配对，“培育”它们来创造下一代。被选择繁殖的概率与它的适应性成正比。有时，这意味着如果一个人具有非常高的相对适应性，就会与自己反复繁殖。

I thought they would develop a "left wall hugging" behavior, but they always seemed to follow something less optimal. In every experiment, the bugs converged to a spiral pattern. They would spiral outward until they touched a wall to the right. They'd follow that, then when they got to the gap, they'd spiral down (away from the gap) and around. They would make a 270 degree turn to the left, then usually enter the gap. This would get them through a majority of the walls, and often to the goal.

我添加的一个功能是在基因中放入一个颜色矢量来跟踪个体之间的相关性。几代之后，它们的颜色都是一样的，这说明我应该有更好的繁殖策略。

我试着让他们制定更好的策略。我把神经网络复杂化了——增加了记忆和其他东西。这没有用。我总是看到同样的策略。

我尝试了各种方法，比如建立单独的基因库，在100代之后才重新组合。但没有什么能促使他们采取更好的策略。也许这是不可能的。

另一个有趣的事情是绘制适应度随时间变化的图表。有明确的模式，比如最大适合度在上升之前会下降。我从未见过一本进化论的书谈到这种可能性。

足球引爆。我建立了一个GA系统来预测每周澳式足球比赛的结果。

A few years ago I got bored of the standard work football pool, everybody was just going online and taking the picks from some pundit in the press. So, I figured it couldn't be too hard to beat a bunch of broadcast journalism majors, right? My first thought was to take the results from Massey Ratings and then reveal at the end of the season my strategy after winning fame and glory. However, for reasons I've never discovered Massey does not track AFL. The cynic in me believes it is because the outcome of each AFL game has basically become random chance, but my complaints of recent rule changes belong in a different forum.

该系统基本上考虑了进攻强度、防守强度、主场优势、每周的改进(或缺乏)以及这些方面的变化速度。这为每支球队在整个赛季中建立了一组多项式方程。可以计算给定日期的每场比赛的获胜者和分数。我们的目标是找到最接近过去所有游戏结果的系数集，并使用该集合来预测接下来几周的游戏。

在实践中，该系统将找到能够准确预测过去90%以上游戏结果的解决方案。然后，它会成功地为即将到来的一周(即不在训练集中的那一周)挑选大约60-80%的比赛。

结果是:略高于中游水平。没有巨额奖金也没有能打败维加斯的系统。不过很有趣。

我从零开始构建一切，没有使用任何框架。

There was an competition on codechef.com (great site by the way, monthly programming competitions) where one was supposed to solve an unsolveable sudoku (one should come as close as possible with as few wrong collumns/rows/etc as possible).What I would do, was to first generate a perfect sudoku and then override the fields, that have been given. From this pretty good basis on I used genetic programming to improve my solution.I couldn't think of a deterministic approach in this case, because the sudoku was 300x300 and search would've taken too long.