我不是PHP开发人员,所以我想知道在PHP中使用显式getter/setter的优点和缺点是什么,在纯OOP风格中,带有私有字段(我喜欢的方式):

class MyClass {
    private $firstField;
    private $secondField;

    public function getFirstField() {
        return $this->firstField;
    }
    public function setFirstField($x) {
        $this->firstField = $x;
    }
    public function getSecondField() {
        return $this->secondField;
    }
    public function setSecondField($x) {
        $this->secondField = $x;
    }
}

或者只是公共字段:

class MyClass {
    public $firstField;
    public $secondField;
}

当前回答

Well, PHP does have magic methods __get, __set, __isset & __unset, which is always a start. Alas proper (get it?) OO properties is more than magic methods. The main problem with PHP's implementation is that magic methods are called for all inaccessible properties. Which means you have to Repeat Yourself (eg. by calling property_exists()) in the magic methods when determining if name is actually a property of your object. And you can't really solve this general problem with a base class unless all your classes inherit from ie. ClassWithProperties, since PHP lacks multiple inheritance.

相比之下,Python的新样式类提供了property(),它允许显式地定义所有属性。c#有特殊的语法。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(编程)

其他回答

我做了一个实验,使用神奇的方法__call。 不确定我是否应该发布它(因为在其他的回答和评论中都有“不要使用魔法方法”的警告),但我将把它留在这里。以防有人觉得有用。


public function __call($_name, $_arguments){
    $action  = substr($_name, 0, 4);
    $varName = substr($_name, 4);

    if (isset($this->{$varName})){
        if ($action === "get_") return $this->{$varName};
        if ($action === "set_") $this->{$varName} = $_arguments[0];
    }
}

只要在你的类中添加上面的方法,现在你可以输入:

class MyClass{
    private foo = "bar";
    private bom = "bim";
    // ...
    // public function __call(){ ... }
    // ...
}
$C = new MyClass();

// as getter
$C->get_foo(); // return "bar"
$C->get_bom(); // return "bim"

// as setter
$C->set_foo("abc"); // set "abc" as new value of foo
$C->set_bom("zam"); // set "zam" as new value of bom


通过这种方式,你可以获取/设置类中存在的所有东西,如果你只需要一些特定的元素,你可以使用“白名单”作为过滤器。

例子:

private $callWhiteList = array(
    "foo" => "foo",
    "fee" => "fee",
    // ...
);

public function __call($_name, $_arguments){
    $action  = substr($_name, 0, 4);
    $varName = $this->callWhiteList[substr($_name, 4)];

    if (!is_null($varName) && isset($this->{$varName})){
        if ($action === "get_") return $this->{$varName};
        if ($action === "set_") $this->{$varName} = $_arguments[0];
    }
}

现在你只能获取/设置“foo”和“fee”。 您还可以使用“白名单”分配自定义名称来访问您的vars。 例如,

private $callWhiteList = array(
    "myfoo" => "foo",
    "zim" => "bom",
    // ...
);

有了这个列表,你现在可以输入:

class MyClass{
    private foo = "bar";
    private bom = "bim";
    // ...
    // private $callWhiteList = array( ... )
    // public function __call(){ ... }
    // ...
}
$C = new MyClass();

// as getter
$C->get_myfoo(); // return "bar"
$C->get_zim(); // return "bim"

// as setter
$C->set_myfoo("abc"); // set "abc" as new value of foo
$C->set_zim("zam"); // set "zam" as new value of bom

. . . 这是所有。


道格: 在对象上下文中调用不可访问的方法时触发__call()。

在阅读了其他建议后,我倾向于这样说:

作为GENERIC规则,你不会总是为所有属性定义setter,特别是“内部”属性(信号量、内部标志……)。只读属性显然没有setter,所以有些属性只有getter;这就是__get()缩小代码的地方:

define a __get() (magical global getters) for all those properties which are alike, group them in arrays so: they'll share common characteristics: monetary values will/may come up properly formatted, dates in an specific layout (ISO, US, Intl.), etc. the code itself can verify that only existing & allowed properties are being read using this magical method. whenever you need to create a new similar property, just declare it and add its name to the proper array and it's done. That's way FASTER than defining a new getter, perhaps with some lines of code REPEATED again and again all over the class code.

是的!我们也可以写一个私有方法来做到这一点,但话又说回来,我们将声明许多方法(++内存),最终调用另一个总是相同的方法。为什么不写一个单一的方法来管理它们呢?(是的!双关语!)):

Magic setter也可以只响应特定的属性,因此可以单独在一个方法中筛选所有日期类型属性的无效值。如果日期类型属性列在数组中,则可以轻松定义它们的setter。当然,这只是一个例子。有太多的情况。

About readability... Well... That's another debate: I don't like to be bound to the uses of an IDE (in fact, I don't use them, they tend to tell me (and force me) how to write... and I have my likes about coding "beauty"). I tend to be consistent about naming, so using ctags and a couple of other aids is sufficient to me... Anyway: once all this magic setters and getters are done, I write the other setters that are too specific or "special" to be generalized in a __set() method. And that covers all I need about getting and setting properties. Of course: there's not always a common ground, or there are such a few properties that is not worth the trouble of coding a magical method, and then there's still the old good traditional setter/getter pair.

编程语言就是人类的人工语言。因此,它们都有自己的语调或重音、语法和风格,所以我不会假装用与Java或c#相同的“重音”来编写Ruby或Python代码,也不会编写类似Perl或SQL的JavaScript或PHP……用他们该用的方式去使用他们。

你可以使用php神奇的方法__get和__set。

<?php
class MyClass {
  private $firstField;
  private $secondField;

  public function __get($property) {
    if (property_exists($this, $property)) {
      return $this->$property;
    }
  }

  public function __set($property, $value) {
    if (property_exists($this, $property)) {
      $this->$property = $value;
    }

    return $this;
  }
}
?>

封装在任何面向对象语言中都很重要,与受欢迎程度无关。在动态类型语言(如PHP)中,它特别有用,因为如果不使用设置符,几乎没有办法确保属性是特定类型的。

在PHP中,这是有效的:

class Foo {
   public $bar; // should be an integer
}
$foo = new Foo;
$foo->bar = "string";

在Java中,它没有:

class Foo {
   public int bar;
}
Foo myFoo = new Foo();
myFoo.bar = "string"; // error

使用魔法方法(__get和__set)也可以,但只有当访问的属性的可见性低于当前作用域可以访问的时候。如果使用不当,调试时很容易让您头疼。

这篇文章不是专门关于__get和__set,而是关于__call,除了方法调用之外,它们是相同的思想。作为一种规则,我远离任何类型的允许重载的魔法方法,原因概述在评论和帖子中,然而,我最近遇到了一个第三方API,我使用了一个服务和一个子服务,例如:

http://3rdparty.api.com?service=APIService.doActionOne&apikey=12341234

这里重要的部分是,这个API除了子操作(在本例中为doActionOne)之外,其他内容都是相同的。这个想法是开发人员(我自己和其他使用这个类的人)可以通过名称调用子服务,而不是像这样:

$myClass->doAction(array('service'=>'doActionOne','args'=>$args));

我可以这样做:

 $myClass->doActionOne($args);

对于硬编码来说,这只是大量的重复(这个例子非常类似于代码):

public function doActionOne($array)
    {
        $this->args     =   $array;
        $name           =   __FUNCTION__;
        $this->response =   $this->executeCoreCall("APIService.{$name}");
    }

public function doActionTwo($array)
    {
        $this->args     =   $array;
        $name           =   __FUNCTION__;
        $this->response =   $this->executeCoreCall("APIService.{$name}");
    }

public function doActionThree($array)
    {
        $this->args     =   $array;
        $name           =   __FUNCTION__;
        $this->response =   $this->executeCoreCall("APIService.{$name}");
    }

protected function executeCoreCall($service)
    {
        $cURL = new \cURL();
        return $cURL->('http://3rdparty.api.com?service='.$service.'&apikey='.$this->api.'&'.http_build_query($this->args))
                    ->getResponse();
    }

但是使用神奇的__call()方法,我能够使用动态方法访问所有服务:

public function __call($name, $arguments)
    {
        $this->args     =   $arguments;
        $this->response =   $this->executeCoreCall("APIService.{$name}");   
        return $this;
    }

这种动态调用数据返回的好处是,如果供应商添加了另一个子服务,我不必向类中添加另一个方法或创建扩展类等。我不确定这是否对任何人都有用,但我想我会展示一个例子,其中__set, __get, __call等可能是一个考虑的选项,因为主要函数是数据的返回。


编辑:

巧合的是,我在帖子发布几天后看到了这篇文章,它准确地概述了我的场景。这不是我指的API,但方法的应用是相同的:

我是否正确使用api ?