使用apply和zip将比Series方式快3倍。

def sizes(s):    
    return locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0, grouping=True) + ' KB', \
        locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0 ** 2, grouping=True) + ' MB', \
        locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0 ** 3, grouping=True) + ' GB'
df_test['size_kb'],  df_test['size_mb'], df_test['size_gb'] = zip(*df_test['size'].apply(sizes))

测试结果如下:

Separate df.apply(): 

    100 loops, best of 3: 1.43 ms per loop

Return Series: 

    100 loops, best of 3: 2.61 ms per loop

Return tuple:

    1000 loops, best of 3: 819 µs per loop

You can go 40+ times faster than the top answers here if you do your math in numpy instead. Adapting @Rocky K's top two answers. The main difference is running on an actual df of 120k rows. Numpy is way faster at math when you apply your functions array-wise (instead of applying a function value-wise). The best answer is by far the third one because it uses numpy for the math. Also notice that it only calculates 1024**2 and 1024**3 once each instead of once for each row, saving 240k calculations. Here are the timings on my machine:

Tuples (pass value, return tuple then zip, new columns dont exist):
Runtime: 10.935037851333618 

Tuples (pass value, return tuple then zip, new columns exist):
Runtime: 11.120025157928467 

Use numpy for math portions:
Runtime: 0.24799370765686035

以下是我用来计算这些时间的脚本(改编自Rocky K):

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import locale
import time

size = np.random.random(120000) * 1000000000
data = pd.DataFrame({'Size': size})

def sizes_pass_value_return_tuple(value):
    a = locale.format_string("%.1f", value / 1024.0, grouping=True) + ' KB'
    b = locale.format_string("%.1f", value / 1024.0 ** 2, grouping=True) + ' MB'
    c = locale.format_string("%.1f", value / 1024.0 ** 3, grouping=True) + ' GB'
    return a, b, c

print('\nTuples (pass value, return tuple then zip, new columns dont exist):')
df1 = data.copy()
start = time.time()
df1['size_kb'],  df1['size_mb'], df1['size_gb'] = zip(*df1['Size'].apply(sizes_pass_value_return_tuple))
end = time.time()
print('Runtime:', end - start, '\n')

print('Tuples (pass value, return tuple then zip, new columns exist):')
df2 = data.copy()
start = time.time()
df2 = pd.concat([df2, pd.DataFrame(columns=['size_kb', 'size_mb', 'size_gb'])])
df2['size_kb'],  df2['size_mb'], df2['size_gb'] = zip(*df2['Size'].apply(sizes_pass_value_return_tuple))
end = time.time()
print('Runtime:', end - start, '\n')

print('Use numpy for math portions:')
df3 = data.copy()
start = time.time()
df3['size_kb'] = (df3.Size.values / 1024).round(1)
df3['size_kb'] = df3.size_kb.astype(str) + ' KB'
df3['size_mb'] = (df3.Size.values / 1024 ** 2).round(1)
df3['size_mb'] = df3.size_mb.astype(str) + ' MB'
df3['size_gb'] = (df3.Size.values / 1024 ** 3).round(1)
df3['size_gb'] = df3.size_gb.astype(str) + ' GB'
end = time.time()
print('Runtime:', end - start, '\n')

使用apply和zip将比Series方式快3倍。

def sizes(s):    
    return locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0, grouping=True) + ' KB', \
        locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0 ** 2, grouping=True) + ' MB', \
        locale.format("%.1f", s / 1024.0 ** 3, grouping=True) + ' GB'
df_test['size_kb'],  df_test['size_mb'], df_test['size_gb'] = zip(*df_test['size'].apply(sizes))

测试结果如下:

Separate df.apply(): 

    100 loops, best of 3: 1.43 ms per loop

Return Series: 

    100 loops, best of 3: 2.61 ms per loop

Return tuple:

    1000 loops, best of 3: 819 µs per loop

它提供了一个新的数据框架，其中包含原始数据框架的两列。

import pandas as pd
df = ...
df_with_two_columns = df.apply(lambda row:pd.Series([row['column_1'], row['column_2']], index=['column_1', 'column_2']),axis = 1)

您可以从包含新数据的应用函数返回一个Series，从而避免需要迭代三次。将axis=1传递给apply函数，将函数的大小应用到数据框架的每一行，返回一个要添加到新数据框架的序列。这个序列s包含新的值，以及原始数据。

def sizes(s):
    s['size_kb'] = locale.format("%.1f", s['size'] / 1024.0, grouping=True) + ' KB'
    s['size_mb'] = locale.format("%.1f", s['size'] / 1024.0 ** 2, grouping=True) + ' MB'
    s['size_gb'] = locale.format("%.1f", s['size'] / 1024.0 ** 3, grouping=True) + ' GB'
    return s

df_test = df_test.append(rows_list)
df_test = df_test.apply(sizes, axis=1)

非常酷的答案!谢谢Jesse和jaumebonet!以下是我对以下方面的一些观察:

邮政编码(*…… ．.． result_type = "扩大")

虽然expand更优雅(pandifyed)，但**zip至少快2倍。在下面这个简单的例子中，我的速度快了4倍。

import pandas as pd

dat = [ [i, 10*i] for i in range(1000)]

df = pd.DataFrame(dat, columns = ["a","b"])

def add_and_sub(row):
    add = row["a"] + row["b"]
    sub = row["a"] - row["b"]
    return add, sub

df[["add", "sub"]] = df.apply(add_and_sub, axis=1, result_type="expand")
# versus
df["add"], df["sub"] = zip(*df.apply(add_and_sub, axis=1))