// Find, Replace, Case
// i.e "Test to see if this works? (Yes|No)".replaceAll('(Yes|No)', 'Yes!');
// i.e.2 "Test to see if this works? (Yes|No)".replaceAll('(yes|no)', 'Yes!', true);
String.prototype.replaceAll = function(_f, _r, _c){ 

  var o = this.toString();
  var r = '';
  var s = o;
  var b = 0;
  var e = -1;
  if(_c){ _f = _f.toLowerCase(); s = o.toLowerCase(); }

  while((e=s.indexOf(_f)) > -1)
  {
    r += o.substring(b, b+e) + _r;
    s = s.substring(e+_f.length, s.length);
    b += e+_f.length;
  }

  // Add Leftover
  if(s.length>0){ r+=o.substring(o.length-s.length, o.length); }

  // Return New String
  return r;
};

我只是编写了一个基准测试，并测试了前3个答案。 对于短字符串(<500字符) 投票第三多的答案比投票第二多的答案快。

对于长字符串(在测试字符串中添加".repeat(300)")，回答1的速度越快，后面跟着第二个和第三个答案。

注意:

上述情况适用于使用v8引擎(chrome/chromium等)的浏览器。 使用firefox (SpiderMonkey引擎)，结果完全不同 你们自己看看吧!! Firefox的第三个解决方案似乎是 第一个解决方案比Chrome快4.5倍…疯狂:D

function log(data) { document.getElementById("log").textContent += data + "\n"; } benchmark = (() => { time_function = function(ms, f, num) { var z; var t = new Date().getTime(); for (z = 0; ((new Date().getTime() - t) < ms); z++) f(num); return (z / ms) } // returns how many times the function was run in "ms" milliseconds. function benchmark() { function compare(a, b) { if (a[1] > b[1]) { return -1; } if (a[1] < b[1]) { return 1; } return 0; } // functions function replace1(s) { s.replace(/foo/g, "bar") } String.prototype.replaceAll2 = function(_f, _r){ var o = this.toString(); var r = ''; var s = o; var b = 0; var e = -1; // if(_c){ _f = _f.toLowerCase(); s = o.toLowerCase(); } while((e=s.indexOf(_f)) > -1) { r += o.substring(b, b+e) + _r; s = s.substring(e+_f.length, s.length); b += e+_f.length; } // Add Leftover if(s.length>0){ r+=o.substring(o.length-s.length, o.length); } // Return New String return r; }; String.prototype.replaceAll = function(str1, str2, ignore) { return this.replace(new RegExp(str1.replace(/([\/\,\!\\\^\$\{\}\[\]\(\)\.\*\+\?\|\<\>\-\&])/g, "\\$&"), (ignore ? "gi" : "g")), (typeof(str2) == "string") ? str2.replace(/\$/g, "$$$$") : str2); } function replace2(s) { s.replaceAll("foo", "bar") } function replace3(s) { s.split('foo').join('bar'); } function replace4(s) { s.replaceAll2("foo", "bar") } funcs = [ [replace1, 0], [replace2, 0], [replace3, 0], [replace4, 0] ]; funcs.forEach((ff) => { console.log("Benchmarking: " + ff[0].name); ff[1] = time_function(2500, ff[0], "foOfoobarBaR barbarfoobarf00".repeat(10)); console.log("Score: " + ff[1]); }) return funcs.sort(compare); } return benchmark; })() log("Starting benchmark...\n"); res = benchmark(); console.log("Winner: " + res[0][0].name + " !!!"); count = 1; res.forEach((r) => { log((count++) + ". " + r[0].name + " score: " + Math.floor(10000 * r[1] / res[0][1]) / 100 + ((count == 2) ? "% *winner*" : "% speed of winner.") + " (" + Math.round(r[1] * 100) / 100 + ")"); }); log("\nWinner code:\n"); log(res[0][0].toString()); <textarea rows="50" cols="80" style="font-size: 16; resize:none; border: none;" id="log"></textarea>

当您单击按钮时，测试将运行10s (+2s)。

我的结果(在同一台电脑上):

Chrome/Linux Ubuntu 64:
1. replace1 score: 100% *winner* (766.18)
2. replace4 score: 99.07% speed of winner. (759.11)
3. replace3 score: 68.36% speed of winner. (523.83)
4. replace2 score: 59.35% speed of winner. (454.78)

Firefox/Linux Ubuntu 64
1. replace3 score: 100% *winner* (3480.1)
2. replace1 score: 13.06% speed of winner. (454.83)
3. replace4 score: 9.4% speed of winner. (327.42)
4. replace2 score: 4.81% speed of winner. (167.46)

很乱，是吧?

擅自增加了更多的测试结果

Chrome/Windows 10
1. replace1 score: 100% *winner* (742.49)
2. replace4 score: 85.58% speed of winner. (635.44)
3. replace2 score: 54.42% speed of winner. (404.08)
4. replace3 score: 50.06% speed of winner. (371.73)

Firefox/Windows 10
1. replace3 score: 100% *winner* (2645.18)
2. replace1 score: 30.77% speed of winner. (814.18)
3. replace4 score: 22.3% speed of winner. (589.97)
4. replace2 score: 12.51% speed of winner. (331.13)

Edge/Windows 10
1. replace1 score: 100% *winner* (1251.24)
2. replace2 score: 46.63% speed of winner. (583.47)
3. replace3 score: 44.42% speed of winner. (555.92)
4. replace4 score: 20% speed of winner. (250.28)

Galaxy Note 4上的Chrome

1. replace4 score: 100% *winner* (99.82)
2. replace1 score: 91.04% speed of winner. (90.88)
3. replace3 score: 70.27% speed of winner. (70.15)
4. replace2 score: 38.25% speed of winner. (38.18)

使用String对象的replace()方法。

正如所选答案中提到的，应该在正则表达式中使用/g标志，以便替换字符串中子字符串的所有实例。

I tried a number of these suggestions after realizing that an implementation I had written of this probably close to 10 years ago actually didn't work completely (nasty production bug in an long-forgotten system, isn't that always the way?!)... what I noticed is that the ones I tried (I didn't try them all) had the same problem as mine, that is, they wouldn't replace EVERY occurrence, only the first, at least for my test case of getting "test....txt" down to "test.txt" by replacing ".." with "."... maybe I missed so regex situation? But I digress...

因此，我重写了我的实现如下。这是非常简单的，虽然我怀疑不是最快的，但我也不认为现代JS引擎的区别是重要的，除非你在一个紧密的循环中做这件事，但这总是任何事情的情况…

function replaceSubstring(inSource, inToReplace, inReplaceWith) {

  var outString = inSource;
  while (true) {
    var idx = outString.indexOf(inToReplace);
    if (idx == -1) {
      break;
    }
    outString = outString.substring(0, idx) + inReplaceWith +
      outString.substring(idx + inToReplace.length);
  }
  return outString;

}

希望这能帮助到别人!

你也可以试试:

string.split('foo').join('bar');

var mystring = 'This is a string';
var newString = mystring.replace(/i/g, "a");

newString现在是'Thas as a strange '