foreach (string file in System.IO.Directory.GetFiles(path))
 {
    System.IO.File.Delete(file);
 }

 foreach (string subDirectory in System.IO.Directory.GetDirectories(path))
 {
     System.IO.Directory.Delete(subDirectory,true); 
 } 

我知道这是一个古老的问题，但这是（也许是新的）正确答案：

new DirectoryInfo(folder).Delete(true);
Directory.CreateDirectory(folder);

删除所有递归，然后重新创建文件夹。

PS-必须具有使用System.IO的引用；

private void ClearFolder(string FolderName)
{
    DirectoryInfo dir = new DirectoryInfo(FolderName);

    foreach(FileInfo fi in dir.GetFiles())
    {
        try
        {
            fi.Delete();
        }
        catch(Exception) { } // Ignore all exceptions
    }

    foreach(DirectoryInfo di in dir.GetDirectories())
    {
        ClearFolder(di.FullName);
        try
        {
            di.Delete();
        }
        catch(Exception) { } // Ignore all exceptions
    }
}

如果您知道没有子文件夹，那么像这样的操作可能是最简单的：

    Array.ForEach(Directory.GetFiles(folderName), File.Delete);

我们也可以表现出对LINQ的热爱：

using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
…
var directory = Directory.GetParent(TestContext.TestDir);

directory.EnumerateFiles()
    .ToList().ForEach(f => f.Delete());

directory.EnumerateDirectories()
    .ToList().ForEach(d => d.Delete(true));

请注意，我这里的解决方案不是高性能的，因为我使用的是Get*（）.ToList（）.ForEach（…），它两次生成相同的IEnumerable。我使用扩展方法来避免此问题：

using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
…
var directory = Directory.GetParent(TestContext.TestDir);

directory.EnumerateFiles()
    .ForEachInEnumerable(f => f.Delete());

directory.EnumerateDirectories()
    .ForEachInEnumerable(d => d.Delete(true));

这是扩展方法：

/// <summary>
/// Extensions for <see cref="System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable"/>.
/// </summary>
public static class IEnumerableOfTExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Performs the <see cref="System.Action"/>
    /// on each item in the enumerable object.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="TEnumerable">The type of the enumerable.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="enumerable">The enumerable.</param>
    /// <param name="action">The action.</param>
    /// <remarks>
    /// “I am philosophically opposed to providing such a method, for two reasons.
    /// …The first reason is that doing so violates the functional programming principles
    /// that all the other sequence operators are based upon. Clearly the sole purpose of a call
    /// to this method is to cause side effects.”
    /// —Eric Lippert, “foreach” vs “ForEach” [http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/05/18/foreach-vs-foreach.aspx]
    /// </remarks>
    public static void ForEachInEnumerable<TEnumerable>(this IEnumerable<TEnumerable> enumerable, Action<TEnumerable> action)
    {
        foreach (var item in enumerable)
        {
            action(item);
        }
    }
}

System.IO.Directory.Delete(installPath, true);
System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(installPath);

IO.Directory.Delete(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath(path), True)

你不需要更多