简单地说 您正在尝试使用可选变量的值为nil。 快速修复可以使用保护或如果让而不是强制打开像放!在变量的末尾

这是一个更重要的注释，这就是为什么隐式打开可选选项在调试nil值时可能具有欺骗性。

考虑下面的代码: 它编译时没有错误/警告:

c1.address.city = c3.address.city

然而在运行时，它给出以下错误:致命错误:在打开可选值时意外地发现nil

你能告诉我哪个对象是nil吗?

你不能!

完整的代码是:

class ViewController: UIViewController {

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()

        var c1 = NormalContact()
        let c3 = BadContact()

        c1.address.city = c3.address.city // compiler hides the truth from you and then you sudden get a crash
    }
}

struct NormalContact {
    var address : Address = Address(city: "defaultCity")
}

struct BadContact {
    var address : Address!
}

struct Address {
    var city : String
}

长话短说，使用var地址:地址!您隐藏了变量可以为nil的可能性，不让其他读取器看到。当它崩溃的时候，你会想“搞什么鬼?!”我的地址不是可选的，所以我为什么要崩溃?!

因此，最好这样写:

c1.address.city = c2.address!.city  // ERROR:  Fatal error: Unexpectedly found nil while unwrapping an Optional value 

你能告诉我哪个对象是nil吗?

这一次，代码对您来说更清楚了。您可以合理地认为，可能是强行打开了address参数。

完整的代码是:

class ViewController: UIViewController {

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()

        var c1 = NormalContact()
        let c2 = GoodContact()

        c1.address.city = c2.address!.city
        c1.address.city = c2.address?.city // not compile-able. No deceiving by the compiler
        c1.address.city = c2.address.city // not compile-able. No deceiving by the compiler
        if let city = c2.address?.city {  // safest approach. But that's not what I'm talking about here. 
            c1.address.city = city
        }

    }
}

struct NormalContact {
    var address : Address = Address(city: "defaultCity")
}

struct GoodContact {
    var address : Address?
}

struct Address {
    var city : String
}

错误EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION和致命错误:在隐式地展开Optional值时意外地发现nil，在声明@IBOutlet但没有连接到故事板时出现的最多。

你还应该了解其他答案中提到的可选选项是如何工作的，但这是唯一一次出现在我身上。

基本上，你试图在Swift只允许非nil值的地方使用nil值，通过告诉编译器信任你，那里永远不会有nil值，从而允许你的应用程序编译。

有几种情况会导致这种致命错误:

forced unwraps: let user = someVariable! If someVariable is nil, then you'll get a crash. By doing a force unwrap you moved the nil check responsibility from the compiler to you, basically by doing a forced unwrap you're guaranteeing to the compiler that you'll never have nil values there. And guess what it happens if somehow a nil value ends in in someVariable? Solution? Use optional binding (aka if-let), do the variable processing there: if user = someVariable { // do your stuff } forced (down)casts: let myRectangle = someShape as! Rectangle Here by force casting you tell the compiler to no longer worry, as you'll always have a Rectangle instance there. And as long as that holds, you don't have to worry. The problems start when you or your colleagues from the project start circulating non-rectangle values. Solution? Use optional binding (aka if-let), do the variable processing there: if let myRectangle = someShape as? Rectangle { // yay, I have a rectangle } Implicitly unwrapped optionals. Let's assume you have the following class definition: class User { var name: String! init() { name = "(unnamed)" } func nicerName() { return "Mr/Ms " + name } } Now, if no-one messes up with the name property by setting it to nil, then it works as expected, however if User is initialized from a JSON that lacks the name key, then you get the fatal error when trying to use the property. Solution? Don't use them :) Unless you're 102% sure that the property will always have a non-nil value by the time it needs to be used. In most cases converting to an optional or non-optional will work. Making it non-optional will also result in the compiler helping you by telling the code paths you missed giving a value to that property Unconnected, or not yet connected, outlets. This is a particular case of scenario #3. Basically you have some XIB-loaded class that you want to use. class SignInViewController: UIViewController { @IBOutlet var emailTextField: UITextField! } Now if you missed connecting the outlet from the XIB editor, then the app will crash as soon as you'll want to use the outlet. Solution? Make sure all outlets are connected. Or use the ? operator on them: emailTextField?.text = "my@email.com". Or declare the outlet as optional, though in this case the compiler will force you to unwrap it all over the code. Values coming from Objective-C, and that don't have nullability annotations. Let's assume we have the following Objective-C class: @interface MyUser: NSObject @property NSString *name; @end Now if no nullability annotations are specified (either explicitly or via NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN/NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_END), then the name property will be imported in Swift as String! (an IUO - implicitly unwrapped optional). As soon as some swift code will want to use the value, it will crash if name is nil. Solution? Add nullability annotations to your Objective-C code. Beware though, the Objective-C compiler is a little bit permissive when it comes to nullability, you might end up with nil values, even if you explicitly marked them as nonnull.

我在从表视图控制器到视图控制器进行segue时遇到了这个错误，因为我忘记在主故事板中为视图控制器指定自定义类名。

一些简单的东西值得检查，如果其他看起来都没问题

TL;博士回答

除了极少数例外，这条规则是黄金法则:

避免使用!

声明变量是可选的(?)，而不是隐式地打开可选的(IUO) (!)

换句话说，应该使用: var nameOfDaughter:字符串?

而不是: var nameOfDaughter:字符串!

使用if let或guard let展开可选变量

要么像这样展开变量:

if let nameOfDaughter = nameOfDaughter {
    print("My daughters name is: \(nameOfDaughter)")
}

或者像这样:

guard let nameOfDaughter = nameOfDaughter else { return }
print("My daughters name is: \(nameOfDaughter)")

这个答案是简洁的，为了充分理解阅读接受的答案

资源

避免强制展开