抽象让您关注对象做了什么，而不是它是如何做的 封装意味着隐藏对象如何做某事的内部细节或机制。

就像你开车时，你知道油门踏板的作用，但你可能不知道它背后的过程，因为它是封装的。

让我用c#举个例子。假设你有一个整数:

int Number = 5;
string aStrNumber = Number.ToString();

你可以使用像number . tostring()这样的方法，它返回数字5的字符表示，并将其存储在字符串对象中。该方法告诉您它做了什么，而不是如何做。

两者之间存在差异

ABSTRAACTION

and

封装

1.    First difference between Abstraction and Encapsulation is that, Abstraction is implemented in Java using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private, package-private and protected access modifier.

2.    Data abstraction simply means generalizing something to hide the complex logic that goes underneath where Encapsulation is DATA HIDING.


3.    Encapsulation is combining related logic data (variables and methods) where as Abstraction is hiding internal implementation details and expose only relevant details to the user. In a way you can Abstraction is achieved by Encapsulation.

封装:对对象的实际用户隐藏不需要的/不期望的/适当的实现细节。 如。

List<string> list = new List<string>();
list.Sort(); /* Here, which sorting algorithm is used and hows its 
implemented is not useful to the user who wants to perform sort, that's 
why its hidden from the user of list. */

抽象:是一种提供泛化的方法，因此是处理大量不同对象的通用方法。如。

class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
  // Aeroplane is a flying object
  // Aeroplane can be fueled
  // Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered 
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code 
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of 
// flying object they are.

// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();

// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far 
// as it can Fill Fuel**

我将尝试以一种简单的方式演示封装。让我们看看. .

将数据和函数包装成一个单元(称为 类)被称为封装。封装、包含和隐藏 关于对象的信息，如内部数据结构和 代码。

封装是-

隐藏的复杂性, 将数据和函数绑定在一起， 使复杂方法私有， 使实例变量为私有， 对最终用户隐藏不必要的数据和函数。

封装实现了抽象。

抽象就是——

显示什么是必要的， 数据需要从最终用户，

让我们看一个例子

下图显示了“将客户详细信息添加到数据库”的图形用户界面。

通过查看图像，我们可以说我们需要一个客户类。

步骤- 1:我的客户类需要什么?

i.e.

2个变量来存储客户代码和客户名称。 1添加客户代码和客户名称到数据库功能。 名称空间CustomerContent ｛ 公共类客户 ｛ CustomerCode = ""; CustomerName = ""; 公共无效ADD() ｛ //我的DB代码会在这里 ｝

现在只有ADD方法不会在这里单独工作。

步骤-2:验证将如何工作，ADD函数的行为?

我们将需要数据库连接代码和验证代码(额外的方法)。

public bool Validate()
{
    //Granular Customer Code and Name
    return true;
}

public bool CreateDBObject()
{
    //DB Connection Code
    return true;
}


class Program
{
static void main(String[] args)
{
CustomerComponent.Customer obj = new CustomerComponent.Customer;

obj.CustomerCode = "s001";
obj.CustomerName = "Mac";

obj.Validate();
obj.CreateDBObject();

obj.ADD();
}
}

现在不需要显示额外的方法(Validate();CreateDBObject()[复杂和额外的方法])给最终用户。最终用户只需要看到和知道客户代码，客户名称和ADD按钮，这将添加记录。最终用户不关心如何将数据添加到数据库?

步骤-3:私有不涉及最终用户交互的额外和复杂的方法。

所以使那些复杂的和额外的方法为私有而不是公共(i。e隐藏这些方法)，并删除obj.Validate();obj.CreateDBObject ();从主类程序中实现封装。

换句话说，将接口简化为终端用户就是封装。

现在代码如下所示

namespace CustomerContent
{
public class Customer
{
public string CustomerCode = "";
public string CustomerName = "";
public void ADD()
{
   //my DB code will go here
}

private bool Validate()
{
    //Granular Customer Code and Name
    return true;
}

private bool CreateDBObject()
{
    //DB Connection Code
    return true;
}


class Program
{
static void main(String[] args)
{
CustomerComponent.Customer obj = new CustomerComponent.Customer;

obj.CustomerCode = "s001";

obj.CustomerName = "Mac";

obj.ADD();
}
}

简介:

步骤-1:我的客户类需要什么?是抽象的。

步骤-3:封装不涉及最终用户交互的额外和复杂的方法。

附注:上面的代码是硬而快速的。

封装隐藏了实现细节，这些细节可能是通用的，也可能不是专门的行为。

抽象提供了一种泛化(例如，在一组行为之上)。

这里有一个很好的阅读:抽象、封装和信息隐藏，作者是Object Agency的Edward V. Berard。

抽象或封装并不严格要求信息隐藏。信息可能会被忽略，但不一定要隐藏。

封装是一种将事物视为单一事物的能力，即使它可能由许多复杂的部分或思想组成。例如，我可以说我坐在一把“椅子”上，而不是指这把椅子上的许多不同部分，每个部分都有特定的设计和功能，它们精确地组合在一起，目的是让我的屁股舒适地离地板几英尺远。

Abstraction is enabled by encapsulation. Because we encapsulate objects, we can think about them as things which relate to each other in some way rather than getting bogged down in the subtle details of internal object structure. Abstraction is the ability to consider the bigger picture, removed from concern over little details. The root of the word is abstract as in the summary that appears at the top of a scholarly paper, not abstract as in a class which can only be instantiated as a derived subclass.

I can honestly say that when I plop my butt down in my chair, I never think about how the structure of that chair will catch and hold my weight. It's a decent enough chair that I don't have to worry about those details. So I can turn my attention toward my computer. And again, I don't think about the component parts of my computer. I'm just looking at a part of a webpage that represents a text area that I can type in, and I'm communicating in words, barely even thinking about how my fingers always find the right letters so quickly on the keyboard, and how the connection is ultimately made between tapping these keys and posting to this forum. This is the great power of abstraction. Because the lower levels of the system can be trusted to work with consistency and precision, we have attention to spare for greater work.