封装和抽象之间的确切区别是什么?
当前回答
抽象让您关注对象做了什么,而不是它是如何做的 封装意味着隐藏对象如何做某事的内部细节或机制。
就像你开车时,你知道油门踏板的作用,但你可能不知道它背后的过程,因为它是封装的。
让我用c#举个例子。假设你有一个整数:
int Number = 5;
string aStrNumber = Number.ToString();
你可以使用像number . tostring()这样的方法,它返回数字5的字符表示,并将其存储在字符串对象中。该方法告诉您它做了什么,而不是如何做。
其他回答
抽象是广义的术语。即封装是抽象的子集。
Abstraction | Encapsulation |
---|---|
It solves an issue at the design level. | Encapsulation solves an issue at implementation level. |
hides the unnecessary detail but shows the essential information. | It hides the code and data into a single entity or unit so that the data can be protected from the outside world. |
Focuses on the external lookout. | Focuses on internal working. |
Lets focus on what an object does instead of how it does it. | Lets focus on how an object does something. |
Example: Outer look of mobile, like it has a display screen and buttons. | Example: Inner details of mobile, how button and display screen connect with each other using circuits. |
示例:解决方案架构师是创建整个解决方案的高级抽象技术设计的人,然后将该设计移交给开发团队进行实现。 在这里,解决方案架构师充当抽象,而开发团队充当封装。
举例:用户数据的封装(组网)
图片由
Abstraction (or modularity) – Types enable programmers to think at a higher level than the bit or byte, not bothering with low-level implementation. For example, programmers can begin to think of a string as a set of character values instead of as a mere array of bytes. Higher still, types enable programmers to think about and express interfaces between two of any-sized subsystems. This enables more levels of localization so that the definitions required for interoperability of the subsystems remain consistent when those two subsystems communicate. Source
Java示例
封装:对对象的实际用户隐藏不需要的/不期望的/适当的实现细节。 如。
List<string> list = new List<string>();
list.Sort(); /* Here, which sorting algorithm is used and hows its
implemented is not useful to the user who wants to perform sort, that's
why its hidden from the user of list. */
抽象:是一种提供泛化的方法,因此是处理大量不同对象的通用方法。如。
class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
// Aeroplane is a flying object
// Aeroplane can be fueled
// Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of
// flying object they are.
// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();
// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far
// as it can Fill Fuel**
一种防止特定对象的数据被外部函数故意或意外误用的机制叫做“数据封装”。
在不包括背景细节或解释的情况下表现基本特征的行为被称为抽象
两者之间存在差异
ABSTRAACTION
and
封装
1. First difference between Abstraction and Encapsulation is that, Abstraction is implemented in Java using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private, package-private and protected access modifier.
2. Data abstraction simply means generalizing something to hide the complex logic that goes underneath where Encapsulation is DATA HIDING.
3. Encapsulation is combining related logic data (variables and methods) where as Abstraction is hiding internal implementation details and expose only relevant details to the user. In a way you can Abstraction is achieved by Encapsulation.
上面提供了很多很好的答案,但我将在这里介绍我的(Java)观点。
数据封装简单地说就是包装和控制类中逻辑分组数据的访问。它通常与另一个关键字-数据隐藏相关联。这是在Java中使用访问修饰符实现的。
一个简单的例子是定义一个私有变量,并使用getter和setter方法访问它,或者将一个方法设置为私有,因为它只在类中使用。用户不需要知道这些方法和变量。
注意:不要误解封装只是关于数据隐藏。当我们说封装时,重点应该是将相关数据和行为分组、打包或捆绑在一起。
另一方面,数据抽象是泛化的概念,这样底层的复杂逻辑就不会暴露给用户。在Java中,这是通过使用接口和抽象类实现的。
的例子,
Lets say we have an interface Animal and it has a function makeSound(). There are two concrete classes Dog and Cat that implement this interface. These concrete classes have separate implementations of makeSound() function. Now lets say we have a animal(We get this from some external module). All user knows is that the object that it is receiving is some Animal and it is the users responsibility to print the animal sound. One brute force way is to check the object received to identify it's type, then typecast it to that Animal type and then call makeSound() on it. But a neater way is to abstracts thing out. Use Animal as a polymorphic reference and call makeSound() on it. At runtime depending on what the real Object type is proper function will be invoked.
详情请点击这里。
复杂的逻辑是在电路板中,封装在一个触摸板中,并提供了一个漂亮的界面(按钮)来将其抽象给用户。
附注:以上链接是我的个人博客。