let propName = 'last_nom';

let sorted_obj = objs.sort((a,b) => {
    if(a[propName] > b[propName]) {
        return 1;
    }
    if (a[propName] < b[propName]) {
        return -1;
    }
    return 0;
}

//This works because the js built-in sort function allows us to define our
//own way of sorting, this funny looking function is simply telling `sort` how to
//determine what is larger. 
//We can use `if(a[propName] > b[propName])` because string comparison is already built into JS
//if you try console.log('a' > 'z' ? 'a' : 'z')
//the output will be 'z' as 'a' is not greater than 'z'
//The return values 0,-1,1 are how we tell JS what to sort on. We're sorting on the last_nom property of the object. 
//When sorting a list it comes down to comparing two items and how to determine which one of them is "larger". 
//We need a way to tell JS how to determine which one is larger. 
//The sort defining function will use the case that returns a 1 to mean that a > b
//and the case that returns -1 to mean that a < b

我知道已经有很多答案了，包括那些带有localeCompare的答案，但如果您出于某种原因不想/不能使用localeCompae，我建议您使用此解决方案，而不是三元运算符解决方案：

objects.sort((a, b) => (a.name > b.name) - (a.name < b.name));

有人可能会说，这段代码在做什么并不明显，但在我看来，三元运算符更糟糕。如果一个三元运算符足够可读，那么两个三元操作符一个嵌入另一个-真的很难读而且很难看。只有两个比较运算符和一个减号运算符的单行代码非常容易阅读，因此很容易推理。

如果您有嵌套对象

const objs = [{
        first_nom: 'Lazslo',
        last_nom: 'Jamf',
        moreDetails: {
            age: 20
        }
    }, {
        first_nom: 'Pig',
        last_nom: 'Bodine',
        moreDetails: {
            age: 21
        }
    }, {
        first_nom: 'Pirate',
        last_nom: 'Prentice',
        moreDetails: {
            age: 22
        }
    }];

nestedSort = (prop1, prop2 = null, direction = 'asc') => (e1, e2) => {
        const a = prop2 ? e1[prop1][prop2] : e1[prop1],
            b = prop2 ? e2[prop1][prop2] : e2[prop1],
            sortOrder = direction === "asc" ? 1 : -1
        return (a < b) ? -sortOrder : (a > b) ? sortOrder : 0;
    }

并称之为

objs.sort(nestedSort("last_nom"));
objs.sort(nestedSort("last_nom", null, "desc"));
objs.sort(nestedSort("moreDetails", "age"));
objs.sort(nestedSort("moreDetails", "age", "desc"));

我没有看到任何类似于我的实现。此版本基于施瓦茨变换习惯用法。

function sortByAttribute(array, ...attrs) {
  // Generate an array of predicate-objects containing
  // property getter, and descending indicator
  let predicates = attrs.map(pred => {
    let descending = pred.charAt(0) === '-' ? -1 : 1;
    pred = pred.replace(/^-/, '');
    return {
      getter: o => o[pred],
      descend: descending
    };
  });
  // Schwartzian transform idiom implementation. AKA "decorate-sort-undecorate"
  return array.map(item => {
    return {
      src: item,
      compareValues: predicates.map(predicate => predicate.getter(item))
    };
  })
  .sort((o1, o2) => {
    let i = -1, result = 0;
    while (++i < predicates.length) {
      if (o1.compareValues[i] < o2.compareValues[i])
        result = -1;
      if (o1.compareValues[i] > o2.compareValues[i])
        result = 1;
      if (result *= predicates[i].descend)
        break;
    }
    return result;
  })
  .map(item => item.src);
}

下面是如何使用它的示例：

let games = [
  { name: 'Mashraki',          rating: 4.21 },
  { name: 'Hill Climb Racing', rating: 3.88 },
  { name: 'Angry Birds Space', rating: 3.88 },
  { name: 'Badland',           rating: 4.33 }
];

// Sort by one attribute
console.log(sortByAttribute(games, 'name'));
// Sort by mupltiple attributes
console.log(sortByAttribute(games, '-rating', 'name'));

使用Lodash或Undercore.js，这是小菜一碟：

const sortedList = _.orderBy(objs, [last_nom], [asc]); // Ascending or descending

方式1：

您可以使用Undercore.js。首先导入下划线。

 import * as _ from 'underscore';
 let SortedObjs = _.sortBy(objs, 'last_nom');

方法2：使用比较函数。

function compare(first, second) {
     if (first.last_nom < second.last_nom)
         return -1;
     if (first.last_nom > second.last_nom)
       return 1;
    return 0;
 }

objs.sort(compare);