All,

得票最多的答案，如果你在研究一个对象，就不适用了。在这种情况下，如果属性不存在，检查将不起作用。这就是我们案例中的问题:请看这个例子:

var x =
{ name: "Homer", LastName: "Simpson" };

var y =
{ name: "Marge"} ;

var z =
{ name: "Bart" , LastName: undefined} ;

var a =
{ name: "Lisa" , LastName: ""} ;

var hasLastNameX = x.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameY = y.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameZ = z.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameA = a.LastName != null;



alert (hasLastNameX + ' ' + hasLastNameY + ' ' + hasLastNameZ + ' ' + hasLastNameA);

var hasLastNameXX = x.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameYY = y.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameZZ = z.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameAA = a.LastName !== null;

alert (hasLastNameXX + ' ' + hasLastNameYY + ' ' + hasLastNameZZ + ' ' + hasLastNameAA);

结果:

true , false, false , true (in case of !=)
true , true, true, true (in case of !==) => so in this sample not the correct answer

plunkr链接:https://plnkr.co/edit/BJpVHD95FhKlpHp1skUE

您可以使用三元运算符和新的空合并运算符轻松做到这一点。

首先:使用三元来检查它是否为真。如果是，则返回false，因此If语句不会运行。

第二:因为现在知道值是假的，所以如果值为空，可以使用空合并运算符返回true。由于它将为任何其他值返回自身，如果它不为null，则将使if语句正确失败。

let x = true; console.log("starting tests") if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x = false if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x = 0; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x=1; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x=""; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x="hello world"; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x=null; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") } x=undefined; if (x?false:x ?? true){ console.log(x,"is nullish") }

我们使用一个helper hasValue来检查null /undefined，并通过TypeScript确保不执行不必要的检查。(后者类似于TS如何抱怨if ("a" === undefined)，因为它总是假的)。

始终使用这个始终是安全的，不像!val匹配空字符串，零等。它还避免了模糊==匹配的使用，这几乎总是一个坏的做法-没有必要引入异常。

type NullPart<T> = T & (null | undefined);

// Ensures unnecessary checks aren't performed - only a valid call if 
// value could be nullable *and* could be non-nullable
type MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T> = NullPart<T> extends never
  ? never
  : NonNullable<T> extends never
  ? never
  : T;

export function hasValue<T>(
  value: MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>,
): value is NonNullable<MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>> {
  return (value as unknown) !== undefined && (value as unknown) !== null;
}

export function hasValueFn<T, A>(
  value: MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>,
  thenFn: (value: NonNullable<T>) => A,
): A | undefined {
  // Undefined matches .? syntax result
  return hasValue(value) ? thenFn(value) : undefined;
}

可能已经晚了!但是你可以用??typescript中的运算符。 参见https://mariusschulz.com/blog/nullish-coalescing-the-operator-in-typescript

TypeScript有专门的函数或语法糖吗

TypeScript完全理解JavaScript版本== null。

通过这样的检查，TypeScript会正确地排除null和undefined。

More

https://basarat.gitbook.io/typescript/recap/null-undefined

All,

得票最多的答案，如果你在研究一个对象，就不适用了。在这种情况下，如果属性不存在，检查将不起作用。这就是我们案例中的问题:请看这个例子:

var x =
{ name: "Homer", LastName: "Simpson" };

var y =
{ name: "Marge"} ;

var z =
{ name: "Bart" , LastName: undefined} ;

var a =
{ name: "Lisa" , LastName: ""} ;

var hasLastNameX = x.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameY = y.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameZ = z.LastName != null;
var hasLastNameA = a.LastName != null;



alert (hasLastNameX + ' ' + hasLastNameY + ' ' + hasLastNameZ + ' ' + hasLastNameA);

var hasLastNameXX = x.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameYY = y.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameZZ = z.LastName !== null;
var hasLastNameAA = a.LastName !== null;

alert (hasLastNameXX + ' ' + hasLastNameYY + ' ' + hasLastNameZZ + ' ' + hasLastNameAA);

结果:

true , false, false , true (in case of !=)
true , true, true, true (in case of !==) => so in this sample not the correct answer

plunkr链接:https://plnkr.co/edit/BJpVHD95FhKlpHp1skUE