由于TypeScript是强类型的,简单地使用if(){}来检查null和undefined听起来并不正确。
TypeScript有专门的函数或语法吗?
由于TypeScript是强类型的,简单地使用if(){}来检查null和undefined听起来并不正确。
TypeScript有专门的函数或语法吗?
当前回答
如果你使用本地存储,小心,你可能会以字符串undefined而不是值undefined结束:
localStorage.setItem('mykey',JSON.stringify(undefined));
localStorage.getItem('mykey') === "undefined"
true
人们可能会发现这个很有用:https://github.com/angular/components/blob/master/src/cdk/coercion/boolean-property.spec.ts
/**
* @license
* Copyright Google LLC All Rights Reserved.
*
* Use of this source code is governed by an MIT-style license that can be
* found in the LICENSE file at https://angular.io/license
*/
/** Coerces a data-bound value (typically a string) to a boolean. */
export function coerceBooleanProperty(value: any): boolean {
return value != null && `${value}` !== 'false';
}
import {coerceBooleanProperty} from './boolean-property';
describe('coerceBooleanProperty', () => {
it('should coerce undefined to false', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty(undefined)).toBe(false);
});
it('should coerce null to false', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty(null)).toBe(false);
});
it('should coerce the empty string to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty('')).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce zero to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty(0)).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce the string "false" to false', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty('false')).toBe(false);
});
it('should coerce the boolean false to false', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty(false)).toBe(false);
});
it('should coerce the boolean true to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty(true)).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce the string "true" to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty('true')).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce an arbitrary string to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty('pink')).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce an object to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty({})).toBe(true);
});
it('should coerce an array to true', () => {
expect(coerceBooleanProperty([])).toBe(true);
});
});
其他回答
使用杂耍检查,你可以在一次命中测试null和undefined:
if (x == null) {
如果你使用严格检查,它只对设置为null的值为真,而对未定义的变量不为真:
if (x === null) {
你可以用这个例子尝试不同的值:
var a: number;
var b: number = null;
function check(x, name) {
if (x == null) {
console.log(name + ' == null');
}
if (x === null) {
console.log(name + ' === null');
}
if (typeof x === 'undefined') {
console.log(name + ' is undefined');
}
}
check(a, 'a');
check(b, 'b');
输出
"a == null" "a未定义" "b == null" "b === null"
在TypeScript 3.7中,我们现在有可选的链接和Nullish Coalescing来同时检查null和undefined,例如:
let x = foo?.bar.baz();
这段代码将检查foo是否有定义,否则它将返回undefined
旧方法:
if(foo != null && foo != undefined) {
x = foo.bar.baz();
}
这样的:
let x = (foo === null || foo === undefined) ? undefined : foo.bar();
if (foo && foo.bar && foo.bar.baz) { // ... }
与可选的链接将:
let x = foo?.bar();
if (foo?.bar?.baz) { // ... }
另一个新特性是Nullish Coalescing,例如:
let x = foo ?? bar(); // return foo if it's not null or undefined otherwise calculate bar
老方法:
let x = (foo !== null && foo !== undefined) ?
foo :
bar();
奖金
我们使用一个helper hasValue来检查null /undefined,并通过TypeScript确保不执行不必要的检查。(后者类似于TS如何抱怨if ("a" === undefined),因为它总是假的)。
始终使用这个始终是安全的,不像!val匹配空字符串,零等。它还避免了模糊==匹配的使用,这几乎总是一个坏的做法-没有必要引入异常。
type NullPart<T> = T & (null | undefined);
// Ensures unnecessary checks aren't performed - only a valid call if
// value could be nullable *and* could be non-nullable
type MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T> = NullPart<T> extends never
? never
: NonNullable<T> extends never
? never
: T;
export function hasValue<T>(
value: MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>,
): value is NonNullable<MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>> {
return (value as unknown) !== undefined && (value as unknown) !== null;
}
export function hasValueFn<T, A>(
value: MustBeAmbiguouslyNullable<T>,
thenFn: (value: NonNullable<T>) => A,
): A | undefined {
// Undefined matches .? syntax result
return hasValue(value) ? thenFn(value) : undefined;
}
我总是这样写:
var foo:string;
if(!foo){
foo="something";
}
这将会很好,我认为它是非常可读的。
if( value ) {
}
如果value不为true,则求值为true:
零 未定义的 南 空字符串" 0 假
Typescript包含javascript规则。